Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/in-defense-of-polemics-managing-disagreement-in-democracies-towards-a-h0at6BFvBv
References (24)
-
R. Ivie (2005)
Democratic Dissent and the Trick of Rhetorical CritiqueCultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 5
-
Mark Angenot (2002)
Doxa and Cognitive BreaksPoetics Today, 23
-
(2008)
Pour Protagoras : Angenot et le sens du social / Dialogues de sourds. Traité de rhétorique antilogique de Marc Angenot. Mille et une nuits, 450 p. -
F. Eemeren, B. Garssen (2008)
Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory -
D. Walton (1998)
The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument -
M. Dascal (2008)
Dichotomies and types of debate -
P. Berghe, L. Coser (1968)
Continuities in the Study of Social Conflict.Social Forces, 46
-
Robert Fogelin (2021)
The Logic of Deep DisagreementsVestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya, sotsiologiya, politologiya
-
C. Mouffe (2000)
The Democratic Paradox -
Kendall Phillips (1999)
A rhetoric of controversyWestern Journal of Communication, 63
-
C. Mouffe (2000)
Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism, 72
-
M. Dascal, Světla Čmejrková, Jana Hoffmannová, Olga Müllerová (1998)
Types of Polemics and Types of Polemical Moves -
M. Dascal, Amnon Knoll, D. Cohen (2011)
‘Cognitive systemic dichotomization’ in public argumentation and controversies -
C. Sălăvăstru (2011)
Argumentation et débats publics -
(2014)
Public sphere Reading: Habermas, J. (1974 [1964]) ‘The public sphere: an encyclopedia article’, New German Critique 3 (1): 49–55. -
Kendall Phillips (1996)
The spaces of public dissension: Reconsidering the public sphereCommunication Monographs, 63
-
J. Habermas, S. Lennox, F. Lennox (1974)
The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article (1964)New German Critique
-
Frans Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. Blair, C. Willard, D. Walton (1992)
Types of Dialogue, Dialectical Shifts and Fallacies* -
Ch. Perelman, Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca, J. Wilkinson, P. Weaver (1971)
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation -
F. Eemeren, B. Garssen (2008)
Controversy and confrontation in argumentative discourse -
Christian Kock (2009)
Constructive Controversy Rhetoric as Dissensus-oriented Discourse -
(1990)
Eristic, Antilogic, Sophistic, Dialectic: Plato's Demarcation of Philosophy from Sophistry -
Bart Verheij (2001)
Douglas Walton, The New Dialectic. Conversational Contexts of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press (Book Review)Artificial Intelligence and Law, 9
-
F. Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, A. Henkemans (1997)
Handboek van de argumentatietheorie. Historische achtergronden en hedendaagse ontwikkelingen [Vertaling van: 'Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments, Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., Mawhaw N.J.]
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Copyright
- © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021. Translation from the French language edition: Apologie de la polémique by Ruth Amossy, and Olga Kirschbaum, © Presses Universitaires de France 2014. Published by Presses universitaires de France. All Rights Reserved.
- ISBN
- 978-3-030-85209-2
- Pages
- 9 –26
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-85210-8_2
- Publisher site
- See Chapter on Publisher Site
Abstract
[To the extent that it appears like an often brutal clash of antagonistic opinions, polemicsPolemics is indissolubly linked to disagreementDisagreement.]
Published: Sep 30, 2021