Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/in-defense-of-polemics-rationality-and-or-passion-thomas-friedman-and-B53YWJTP1y
References (12)
-
C. Plantin (2011)
Les bonnes raisons des émotions -
C. Marello (2002)
Bondi, Marina (1998, Ed.). Forms of Argumentative Discourse. Per un'analisi linguistica dell'argomentareArgumentation, 16
-
C. Plantin (1997)
L'argumentation dans l'émotion, 96
-
Ch. Perelman, Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca, J. Wilkinson, P. Weaver (1971)
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation -
M. Meyer, R. Barsky (2000)
Philosophy and the Passions: Towards a History of Human Nature -
Roselyne Koren (2003)
Stratégies et enjeux de la “dépolitisation par le langage” dans un corpus de presse actuelle, 20
-
D. Walton (1992)
The place of emotion in argument -
R. Amossy (2006)
L'argumentation dans le discours -
R. Micheli (2010)
Qu'est-ce qu'une polémique affective ? Réflexion sur les liens entre la polémique et la construction discursive de l'émotion -
R. Amossy, Roselyne Koren (2010)
Argumentation et discours politiqueMots
-
M. Nussbaum (2001)
Upheavals of Thought: Acknowledgments -
R. Boudon (1994)
La logique des sentiments morauxL'Année Sociologique, 44
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Copyright
- © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021. Translation from the French language edition: Apologie de la polémique by Ruth Amossy, and Olga Kirschbaum, © Presses Universitaires de France 2014. Published by Presses universitaires de France. All Rights Reserved.
- ISBN
- 978-3-030-85209-2
- Pages
- 99 –121
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-85210-8_6
- Publisher site
- See Chapter on Publisher Site
Abstract
[Does public controversyPublic controversy in its polemical dimension lie under the banner of passionPassion? That is what public opinion would lead us to think.]
Published: Sep 30, 2021