Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Collins (2000)
The Sociology of PhilosophiesPhilosophy of the Social Sciences, 30
P. Kropotkin
Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution
Maureen O’Malley, J. Dupré (2007)
Size doesn’t matter: towards a more inclusive philosophy of biologyBiology & Philosophy, 22
P. Crook (1994)
Darwinism, war and history: Frontmatter
D. Ladkin (2008)
Leading beautifully: How mastery, congruence and purpose create the aesthetic of embodied leadership practiceLeadership Quarterly, 19
D. Ladkin (2006)
The Enchantment of the Charismatic Leader: Charisma Reconsidered as Aesthetic EncounterLeadership, 2
M. Davis (2003)
Late Victorian holocausts : El Niño famines and the making of the Third WorldEnvironmental History, 8
J. Hobson
The social problem
Étienne Balibar, James Swenson (2009)
We, the People of Europe?: Reflections on Transnational Citizenship
M. Freeden (1979)
The New Liberalism: An Ideology of Social Reform
G. Lawrence, J. Gilluly, Aaron Waters, A. Woodford (1969)
Principles of GeologyThe Geographical Journal, 135
R. Gagnier (2000)
The insatiability of human wants
J. Ruskin, C. Wilmer (1985)
Unto This Last and Other Writings
[This book began with points to which I kept returning since I began to write on the nineteenth century and social theory. These included, first, Holbrook Jackson’s description of the 1890s as “a decade singularly rich in ideas, personal genius and social will” whose “central characteristic was a widespread concern for the correct — the most effective, most powerful, most righteous — mode of living.”1 Second, the compatibility in that period of individualism and socialism that has been increasingly difficult for later generations to comprehend. Third, polarized reactions to the excesses of modernization that could culminate, on the one hand, in political action to the point of physical force (William Morris) and, on the other, in hagiography and religious conversion (J. K. Huysmans). And fourth, the intricate dissection of relationships of symmetric and asymmetric mutuality. It also began with the experiments of people who attempted to live their lives creatively, as if they were works of art, and treated decorum as formed behavior, civility as formed interaction, beautiful objects as formed labor, beautiful Nature as formed matter, games as formed competition, ascesis as formed self, and, often, socialism as formed society, forming self-interest for the social good: people, that is, who embodied and performed detachment as both critical and aesthetic.]
Published: Nov 30, 2015
Keywords: Nineteenth Century; Methodological Individualism; Philosophical Anthropology; Ethical Society; Formed Competition
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.