Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/international-measurement-of-disability-summary-of-washington-group-rn3ORwkurV
References (7)
-
Kristen Miller, D. Mont, Aaron Maitland, B. Altman, J. Madans (2011)
Results of a cross-national structured cognitive interviewing protocol to test measures of disabilityQuality & Quantity, 45
-
B. Forsyth, J. Lessler (2011)
Cognitive Laboratory Methods: A Taxonomy -
Gordon Willis, Kristen Miller (2011)
Cross-Cultural Cognitive InterviewingField Methods, 23
-
Patricia Goerman, Rachel Caspar (2010)
Managing the cognitive pretesting of multilingual survey instruments: A case study of pretesting of the U.S. Census Bureau Bilingual Spanish/English Questionnaire -
Kristen Miller, R. Fitzgerald, José-Luis Padilla, Stephanie Willson, S. Widdop, Rachel Caspar, Martin Dimov, M. Gray, Cátia Nunes, Peter Prüfer, Nicole Schöbi, Alisú Schoua‐Glusberg (2011)
Design and Analysis of Cognitive Interviews for Comparative Multinational TestingField Methods, 23
-
Justin Mezetin, Meredith Massey (2014)
Analysis Software for Cognitive Interviewing Studies: Q‐Notes and Q‐Bank -
Kristen Miller, Stephanie Willson, Valerie Chepp, José-Luis Padilla (2014)
Cognitive Interviewing Methodology: Miller/Cognitive
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Copyright
- © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016
- ISBN
- 978-3-319-28496-5
- Pages
- 69 –84
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-28498-9_5
- Publisher site
- See Chapter on Publisher Site
Abstract
[Over the past decade multiple question evaluation studies were conducted to examine the performance of Washington Group questions. While the goal of each study was to examine cross-cultural and multi-lingual comparability, the methodological designs of the studies differed. This chapter presents an overview of those evaluations, including the research goals, methodologies utilized, limitations and methodological advancements.]
Published: Jun 15, 2016
Keywords: Disability question evaluation; Question interpretation; Question inconsistencies; Q-notes