Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Inglehart, C. Welzel (2005)
Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence
R. Inglehart, C. Welzel (2005)
Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: THE CONSEQUENCES OF VALUE CHANGE
J. Thomas (1997)
Redevelopment and Race: Planning a Finer City in Postwar Detroit
Erica Ryu, M. Couper, R. Marans (2006)
Survey Incentives: Cash vs. In-Kind; Face-to-Face vs. Mail; Response Rate vs. Nonresponse ErrorInternational Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18
R. Marans (2003)
Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: the 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators☆Landscape and Urban Planning, 65
Angus Campbeli, W. Rodgers (1976)
The Sense of Well-Being: Developing Measures. (Book Reviews: The Quality of American Life. Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions)Science
R. Freedman (1953)
The Detroit Area Study: A Training and Research Laboratory in the CommunityAmerican Journal of Sociology, 59
[The chapter gives an overview of a 2001 quality of urban life (QOUL) study of metropolitan Detroit area residents. Metro Detroit consists of seven contiguous Southeast Michigan counties, one of which contains the state’s largest city, Detroit. A survey of over 4,000 adult residents was the primary source of information while supplemental data about the physical and social environments associated with the respondents were also collected. A major purpose of the study was to inform policy makers and planners on conditions in the region at the beginning of the twenty-first century and establish a benchmark for measuring environmental and social changes that were expected to occur over future decades. Another purpose was to better understand relationships between residents’ perceptions, evaluations, and behaviors and the urban conditions to which they were responding. Following an overview of Metro Detroit, the approach used in carrying out the research is discussed. Selected findings covering quality of life (QOL), QOUL, and other topics (neighborhoods and neighboring, transportation, and prospects for the future) are then presented. The uses of findings for policy and planning are discussed along with key lessons learned from the study.]
Published: Aug 2, 2011
Keywords: Life Satisfaction; Satisfaction Score; Public Transit; World Value Survey; Metro Area
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.