Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Pattison (1992)
Kierkegaard: The Aesthetic and the Religious
[The limit between immanence and transcendence is not simple. Rather than merely dividing two distinct domains, it intervenes in and organizes those domains. As we have argued, analogy (even in the minimal Barthian requirement that we can specify the “whence” of a revelation) is a crucial, and perhaps indispensable, mediator of transcendence to the world. As such, it has a function: the analogy machine grounds, guarantees, and harmonizes all the differences. Analogy is theodicy: a way of justifying transcendence, securing its difference from the world in the interests of harmonizing that world, referring it to a supratemporal and preexisting harmony as the ground of its being and the hope of its future.]
Published: Dec 16, 2015
Keywords: Single Individual; Fairy Tale; Immanent Power; Unknown Territory; Divine Reality
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.