Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Kierkegaard and the Refusal of TranscendenceSilhouettes: Figuring the Immanent Paradox

Kierkegaard and the Refusal of Transcendence: Silhouettes: Figuring the Immanent Paradox [I have been arguing that Kierkegaard’s paradox is best understood in terms of a dynamic ethics of immanence, one that refuses the mediation of the transcendent offered by analogy and its sublimation of suffering into theodicy. Allied to this is an insistence that the paradox only exists as figured, expressed or articulated in existence. There is no transcendent original seeking to enter the world from the outside, but only the excessive power of the unconditioned deforming and remaking the world from within.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Kierkegaard and the Refusal of TranscendenceSilhouettes: Figuring the Immanent Paradox

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/kierkegaard-and-the-refusal-of-transcendence-silhouettes-figuring-the-L8ie4Ios19

References (1)

Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan US
Copyright
© Steven Shakespeare 2015
ISBN
978-1-137-38675-5
Pages
137 –157
DOI
10.1057/9781137382955_6
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[I have been arguing that Kierkegaard’s paradox is best understood in terms of a dynamic ethics of immanence, one that refuses the mediation of the transcendent offered by analogy and its sublimation of suffering into theodicy. Allied to this is an insistence that the paradox only exists as figured, expressed or articulated in existence. There is no transcendent original seeking to enter the world from the outside, but only the excessive power of the unconditioned deforming and remaking the world from within.]

Published: Dec 16, 2015

Keywords: Fairy Tale; Christian Theology; Sensual Pleasure; Established Order; Transcendent Meaning

There are no references for this article.