Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Helmholz, T. Green (1984)
Juries, Libel & Justice: The Role of English Juries in Seventeenth and Eighteenth-century Trials for Libel and Slander: Papers Read at a Clark Library Seminar, 28 February 1981
J. French (1930)
George Wither in PrisonPMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 45
P. Croft (1991)
The Reputation of Robert Cecil: Libels, Political Opinion and Popular Awareness in the Early Seventeenth CenturyTransactions of the Royal Historical Society, 1
D. Kay (1990)
Melodious Tears: The English Funeral Elegy from Spenser to Milton
J. Sommerville (1996)
English and European Political Ideas in the Early Seventeenth Century: Revisionism and the Case of AbsolutismJournal of British Studies, 35
L. Peck (1982)
Northampton, patronage and policy at the court of James I
R. Manning (1980)
The Origins of the Doctrine of SeditionAlbion, 12
Thomas Starkie, J. Wendell
A treatise on the law of slander and libel
Richard Dutton, Cyndia Clegg (2003)
Press Censorship in Jacobean EnglandAlbion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies, 35
[By the time he wrote this passage, George Wither already had a reputation as a prison poet. Wither had spent over five months in the Marshalsea in 1614 over his satire Abuses Stript, and Whipt (1613), and when Wither’s Motto itself fell victim to ‘these guilty Times’, he once again found himself in prison. In fact, throughout his lengthy and prolific literary career, which began in 1612 and ended with his death in 1667, Wither was arrested six times and imprisoned on at least four occasions for his writings.1 Given this extensive experience and his reputation as an oppositional poet, Wither is an ideal candidate for a study of early Stuart censorship, and not surprisingly he has a prominent place in Cyndia Susan Clegg’s recent study Press Censorship in Jacobean England. Clegg takes to task a Whig model of censorship for its over-simplifying account of a repressive state determined to silence all dissent. Instead, she draws attention to the varied, and sometimes competing, interests informing censorship practices to argue that instances of press censorship were isolated events determined by local interests rather than a wider ideology. Clegg bases her conclusions about a culture of censorship primarily on evidence of press control.2]
Published: Nov 16, 2015
Keywords: Public Opinion; Reading Practice; Hard Thing; Privy Council; Late Sixteenth
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.