Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[As the previous chapters have illustrated, Olympic delivery was a meticulous construction that had a divisive impact upon some sections of the Newham community. Olympic delivery outcomes were underpinned by the widespread belief, portrayed by politicians and Olympic deliverers in the media and at community-consultation events, that all delivery measures were necessary preconditions to successful Olympic Games. One widely touted aspect of Olympic legacy was the inevitability of East London’s regeneration. This regeneration—never actually defined—ran parallel to the delivery of the Olympic Games and is explored here in relation to the physical and symbolic implications of urban modification. What follows is an analysis of the outcomes of Newham’s Olympic-related gentrification.]
Published: Oct 28, 2015
Keywords: Economic Capital; Olympic Game; Shopping Center; Creative Class; London Borough
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.