Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[The issues raised in the previous chapters did not resonate greatly on a national scale. Arguably, this was due to the allure of the Olympic Games and the role of Olympic legacy diverting attention away from the oft-mundane nature of everyday life. This chapter considers the process and implication of living through Olympic delivery in relation to geographical location and first-hand experience. To paraphrase public relations expert Philip Lesly (1974), London 2012 spoke to the urges, interests, and desires of contemporary Britain, and was attuned to the mental and emotional bent of the British society. There are significant complexities in this debate that need attention and so do the contested narratives that mark this context.]
Published: Oct 28, 2015
Keywords: Olympic Game; London Borough; Paralympic Game; Identity Affirmation; Nationalistic Imagery
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.