Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[The attraction of the Olympic Games, as a sporting event with its memorable ever-ready athletic performances, is easily understandable. World records in sport are enthralling. The Games and the narratives they provide are enchanting. Their public, the teeming mass of common humanity, rejoices and commiserates with those undergoing athletic rigors. However, the prevalent belief of those spouting the benefits of an after-Games “legacy” appears less fundamentally sound. This issue has surrounded the Games over the past 40 years. For decades, as in 2012, the promised benefits to the host communities have been expected to be felt from the very beginnings of the Olympic delivery in the shape of jobs in construction, skills-training related to the building and servicing of Olympic venues, and the transformation of Olympic locales for the benefit of the local community.]
Published: Oct 28, 2015
Keywords: Olympic Game; Host Community; Common Humanity; Symbolic Capital; World Record
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.