Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Joel Capellan (2016)
Looking upstream: A sociological investigation of mass public shootings
R. Agnew (1992)
Foundation for a General Strain Theory of Crime and DelinquencyCrime, Inequality and the State
Joel Capellan, A. Anisin (2018)
A Distinction Without a Difference? Examining the Causal Pathways Behind Ideologically Motivated Mass Public ShootingsHomicide Studies, 22
A. Raine, Jiang Liu (1998)
Biological predispositions to violence and their implications for biosocial treatment and preventionPsychology Crime & Law, 4
J. Levin, Eric Madfis (2009)
Mass Murder at School and Cumulative StrainAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 52
C. Ferguson (2008)
The school shooting/violent video game link: causal relationship or moral panic?Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 5
James Silver, J. Horgan, P. Gill (2018)
Shared Struggles? Cumulative Strain Theory and Public Mass Murderers From 1990 to 2014Homicide Studies, 23
D. Harding, Cybelle Fox, Jal Mehta (2002)
Studying Rare Events Through Qualitative Case StudiesSociological Methods & Research, 31
J. Fox, J. Levin (2016)
Explaining Mass Shootings
Caitlin Bonanno, R. Levenson (2014)
School ShootersSAGE Open, 4
G. Duwe (2004)
The patterns and prevalence of mass murder in twentieth-century AmericaJustice Quarterly, 21
Lawrence Cohen, M. Felson (1979)
Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity ApproachAmerican Sociological Review, 44
T. Bedrosian, R. Nelson (2018)
The biology of human aggression
[Mass shootings constitute an extremely rare form of violence and because of their rarity, they are difficult to not only generalize on, but to study and apply theoretical frameworks to. This chapter identifies the difficulties associated with studying rare events, and engages with previous literature in which recommendations were made on how to deal with the rarity aspect of mass shootings. The chapter then describes the book’s chosen theoretical approach—Cumulative Strain Theory (CST). It justifies why (CST) is adopted in the book over other frameworks and relates earlier presented datadata to both individual and societal level variables that are captured in the approach as either potentially causal factors that underpin mass shootings or as background antecedent conditions. The chapter concludes by demonstrating that even in light of CST being a framework that originated from the study of American offenders, its applicability to CEE contexts is potentially fruitful because offenders across these contexts.]
Published: Nov 18, 2021
Keywords: Theory building; Case studies; Rare events; Cumulative Strain Theory; Comparative methods
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.