Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
I. Shafarevich (1987)
Yuri Ivanovich ManinDuke Mathematical Journal, 54
(2009)
In Demidovich (Ed.), Mekhmatiane vspominaiut (vol
D. Fuchs (2014)
Dima Arnold in my life
(2007)
É tude on Life
J. Vasiliev (2008)
About I.M. Gelfand’s SeminarRussian Journal of Developmental Biology, 39
(2013)
Works of I . Gelfand on the theory of representations
E. Frenkel (2013)
Love and Math: The Heart of Hidden Reality
(1995)
Bylo trudno, chasto—obidno
(2004)
Predislovie redaktora
A. Khovanskii, A. Varchenko (2014)
Arnold’s seminar, first years
May Concern, Jacob Jurss (1957)
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERNMedical Journal of Australia, 1
(1982)
The 200 ‘ Pure ’ mathematicians most cited in 1978 and 1979 , including a list of most - cited publications for the top 100
Slava Gerovitch, Israel Gelfand (2017)
Parallel Worlds: Formal Structures and Informal Mechanisms of Postwar Soviet Mathematics
V. Retakh (2013)
Israel Moiseevich Gelfand, Part IINotices of the American Mathematical Society, 60
(2009)
O reforme obrazovaniia v Rossii
V. Retakh (2010)
Israel Moiseevich GelfandNotices of the American Mathematical Society, 60
R. Minlos (2005)
Felix Alexandrovich Berezin (A Brief Scientific Biography)Letters in Mathematical Physics, 74
M. Shifman (2007)
Felix Berezin: Life and Death of the Mastermind of Supermathematics
A. Némethi (2011)
Yuri Ivanovich ManinActa Mathematica Hungarica, 133
A. Vorob’ev (2008)
Israel Moiseevich Gelfand’s Seminar on biologyRussian Journal of Developmental Biology, 39
Gel ’ fanda po funktsional ’ nomu analizu i matematicheskoi fi zike v MGU
(2008)
Genuis
(1994)
Zeigarnik effect
(2007)
About mathematics at Moscow State University in the late 1940 s and early 1950 s
[Israel Gelfand’s weekly seminar at Moscow State University, which ran continuously from 1943 to 1989, has gained a legendary status in the Russian mathematics community. It evokes a mixture of admiration and revulsion. Did the style of the seminar merely reflect the eccentric personality of its leader, or did it indicate some broader cultural patterns? Did the seminar thrive despite its offensive style, or was the style part of the enigma? How does today’s perspective of the memoirists differ from the contemporary perceptions of the seminar? To start answering these questions, we will place the Gelfand seminar in the social context of postwar Soviet mathematics.]
Published: May 26, 2016
Keywords: High School Student; Seminar Participant; Video Interview; Soviet Mathematic; Official Institution
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.