Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Mathematical Practitioners and the Transformation of Natural Knowledge in Early Modern EuropeHandwork and Brainwork: Beyond the Zilsel Thesis

Mathematical Practitioners and the Transformation of Natural Knowledge in Early Modern Europe:... [This chapter challenges the traditional historiography of the scientific revolution, arguing that skilled artisans and mathematical practitioners were essential for a transformation of natural knowledge, the so-called ‘scholar-craftsman’ debate. Beginning with a new articulation of Edgar Zilsel’s thesis, which argued for an essential role for mathematical practitioners (or as he would have called them, “superior artisans”) in the scientific revolution, this chapter argues that historians need to take into account social, cultural, political and economic factors, rather than the simpler Marxist explanations of Zilsel. Cormack thus presents the case for the importance of social, economic, and cultural influences on the changing face of nature studies, particularly seeing the importance of mathematical practitioners in putting forward an agenda of utility, measurement, and inductive methodology. This is an argument for the important influence of both social factors and the practitioners themselves. Using English geography in the sixteenth century, and particularly the work of Edward Wright and Thomas Harriot, she argues that geography and mathematics allowed communication between theory and practice, provided new spaces for such exchanges, and changed attitudes towards mathematization, practicality and utility.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Mathematical Practitioners and the Transformation of Natural Knowledge in Early Modern EuropeHandwork and Brainwork: Beyond the Zilsel Thesis

Part of the Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Book Series (volume 45)
Editors: Cormack, Lesley B.; Walton, Steven A.; Schuster, John A.
Cormack, Lesley B.
Mathematical Practitioners and the Transformation of Natural Knowledge in Early Modern Europe — Mar 16, 2017
Download PDF
24 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/mathematical-practitioners-and-the-transformation-of-natural-knowledge-2r0GStp1GR

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
ISBN
978-3-319-49429-6
Pages
11 –35
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-49430-2_2
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[This chapter challenges the traditional historiography of the scientific revolution, arguing that skilled artisans and mathematical practitioners were essential for a transformation of natural knowledge, the so-called ‘scholar-craftsman’ debate. Beginning with a new articulation of Edgar Zilsel’s thesis, which argued for an essential role for mathematical practitioners (or as he would have called them, “superior artisans”) in the scientific revolution, this chapter argues that historians need to take into account social, cultural, political and economic factors, rather than the simpler Marxist explanations of Zilsel. Cormack thus presents the case for the importance of social, economic, and cultural influences on the changing face of nature studies, particularly seeing the importance of mathematical practitioners in putting forward an agenda of utility, measurement, and inductive methodology. This is an argument for the important influence of both social factors and the practitioners themselves. Using English geography in the sixteenth century, and particularly the work of Edward Wright and Thomas Harriot, she argues that geography and mathematics allowed communication between theory and practice, provided new spaces for such exchanges, and changed attitudes towards mathematization, practicality and utility.]

Published: Mar 16, 2017

Keywords: Natural World; Seventeenth Century; Modern Science; Sixteenth Century; Scientific Revolution

There are no references for this article.