Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Mathematical Practitioners and the Transformation of Natural Knowledge in Early Modern EuropeConsuming and Appropriating Practical Mathematics and the Mixed Mathematical Fields, or Being “Influenced” by Them: The Case of the Young Descartes

Mathematical Practitioners and the Transformation of Natural Knowledge in Early Modern Europe:... [This chapter aims to clarify how historians can address the problem of what early modern practical and mixed mathematics had to do with the contemporary transformation of natural knowledge, taking the latter primarily as a set of changes in the domain of natural philosophy. It examines this problem from the perspective of natural philosophical consumers of resources—technical, theoretical and rhetorical—provided by mathematical practitioners and devotees of the mixed mathematical disciplines. The chapter criticizes historical narratives which speak of practical or mixed mathematics ‘influencing’ and ‘shaping’ natural philosophy, proposing that the relationship is better understood as a process of appropriating and translating resources between one field and another. Also questioned are prevalent narratives in which a ‘target’ (e.g. ‘science’) is influenced by a ‘source’ (e.g. practical mathematics) to produce some grand and essential change such as the ‘birth of modern science’. Four case studies support this analysis: Three are drawn from the author’s earlier studies of the young Descartes’ aspirations in physico-mathematics and mechanistic natural philosophy; the fourth deals with the question of the appropriation and transformation of mechanics from practical and mixed mathematics into natural philosophy, in which Descartes played a part.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Mathematical Practitioners and the Transformation of Natural Knowledge in Early Modern EuropeConsuming and Appropriating Practical Mathematics and the Mixed Mathematical Fields, or Being “Influenced” by Them: The Case of the Young Descartes

Part of the Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Book Series (volume 45)
Editors: Cormack, Lesley B.; Walton, Steven A.; Schuster, John A.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/mathematical-practitioners-and-the-transformation-of-natural-knowledge-mW9eroBfVC

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
ISBN
978-3-319-49429-6
Pages
37 –65
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-49430-2_3
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[This chapter aims to clarify how historians can address the problem of what early modern practical and mixed mathematics had to do with the contemporary transformation of natural knowledge, taking the latter primarily as a set of changes in the domain of natural philosophy. It examines this problem from the perspective of natural philosophical consumers of resources—technical, theoretical and rhetorical—provided by mathematical practitioners and devotees of the mixed mathematical disciplines. The chapter criticizes historical narratives which speak of practical or mixed mathematics ‘influencing’ and ‘shaping’ natural philosophy, proposing that the relationship is better understood as a process of appropriating and translating resources between one field and another. Also questioned are prevalent narratives in which a ‘target’ (e.g. ‘science’) is influenced by a ‘source’ (e.g. practical mathematics) to produce some grand and essential change such as the ‘birth of modern science’. Four case studies support this analysis: Three are drawn from the author’s earlier studies of the young Descartes’ aspirations in physico-mathematics and mechanistic natural philosophy; the fourth deals with the question of the appropriation and transformation of mechanics from practical and mixed mathematics into natural philosophy, in which Descartes played a part.]

Published: Mar 16, 2017

Keywords: Seventeenth Century; Geometrical Optic; Scientific Revolution; Operative Knowledge; Natural Philosopher

There are no references for this article.