Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Pirie, T. Kieren (1994)
Beyond Metaphor: Formalising in Mathematical Understanding within Constructivist Environments.for the learning of mathematics, 14
F. Varela, E. Thompson, E. Rosch (1993)
The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience
Byu Scholarsarchive, A. Manning, Scott McCloud (2018)
Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art
A. Obersteiner, T. Dresler, S. Bieck, K. Moeller (2018)
Understanding Fractions: Integrating Results from Mathematics Education, Cognitive Psychology, and NeuroscienceConstructing Number
B. Davis, Moshe Renert (2013)
The Math Teachers Know: Profound Understanding of Emergent Mathematics
M. Seligman (2011)
Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being
Thomas Cortina (2007)
An introduction to computer science for non-majors using principles of computationProceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
A. Sfard (2008)
Thinking as Communicating: Human Development, the Growth of Discourses, and Mathematizing
B. Davis, K. Francis, Sharon Friesen (2019)
STEM Education by Design
Shuchi Grover, R. Pea (2013)
Computational Thinking in K–12Educational Researcher, 42
M. Warnock, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Colin Smith (1964)
Phenomenology of Perception.The Philosophical Quarterly, 14
B. Davis, E. Simmt (2003)
Understanding Learning Systems: Mathematics Education and Complexity Science.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34
C. Heath, J. Hindmarsh, P. Luff (2010)
Video Analysis and Qualitative Research
L. George (2017)
Children's learning of the partitive quotient fraction sub-construct and the elaboration of the don't need boundary feature of the Pirie-Kieren theory
K. Francis, M. Poscente, Meredith Swallow, S. Hennessey (2017)
Building number sense with Lego RobotsTeaching children mathematics, 23
Daniel Hutto (2013)
Psychology Unified: From Folk Psychology to Radical EnactivismReview of General Psychology, 17
H. Jaegher, E. Paolo (2013)
Enactivism is not interactionismFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6
S. Pirie, T. Kieren (1994)
Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterise it and how can we represent it?Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26
G. Humphreys, E. Yoon, Sanjay Kumar, Vaia Lestou, K. Kitadono, Katherine Roberts, M. Riddoch (2010)
The interaction of attention and action: from seeing action to acting on perception.British journal of psychology, 101 Pt 2
K. Francis, Steven Khan, B. Davis (2016)
Enactivism, Spatial Reasoning and CodingDigital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2
A. Sfard (1991)
On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coinEducational Studies in Mathematics, 22
I. Illich (1973)
Tools for Conviviality
N. Endou, Yasumasa Suzuki, Y. Shidama
Hilbert Space of Real Sequences
E. Redcay, M. Kleiner, R. Saxe (2012)
Look at this: the neural correlates of initiating and responding to bids for joint attentionFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6
David Braithwaite, R. Siegler (2018)
Developmental changes in the whole number bias.Developmental science, 21 2
H. Knoblauch, René Tuma, Bernt Schnettler, Kathleen Luft (2014)
Videography: Introduction to Interpretive Videoanalysis of Social Situations
Matthew Koehler, Punya Mishra (2005)
What Happens When Teachers Design Educational Technology? The Development of Technological Pedagogical Content KnowledgeJournal of Educational Computing Research, 32
J. Hiebert, T. Carpenter (1992)
Learning and teaching with understanding.
D. Ball, H. Hill, H. Bass (2005)
Knowing Mathematics for Teaching Who Knows Mathematics Well Enough To Teach Third Grade, and How Can We Decide?
Steven Khan, K. Francis, B. Davis (2015)
Accumulation of experience in a vast number of cases: enactivism as a fit framework for the study of spatial reasoning in mathematics educationZDM, 47
L. Plowman, C. Stephen (2008)
The big picture? Video and the representation of interactionBritish Educational Research Journal, 34
(2018)
The New How People Learn: Culture Matters: A New Report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Puts a Research Spotlight on Issues That Matter to Educators
F. Marton (2018)
Towards a pedagogical theory of learning
L. Brown, Alf Coles (2011)
Developing expertise: how enactivism re-frames mathematics teacher developmentZDM, 43
G. West, Miguel Vadillo, D. Shanks, C. Hulme (2017)
The procedural learning deficit hypothesis of language learning disorders: we see some problemsDevelopmental Science, 21
Martin Simon (2006)
Key Developmental Understandings in Mathematics: A Direction for Investigating and Establishing Learning GoalsMathematical Thinking and Learning, 8
S. Papert (1993)
The children's machine: rethinking school in the age of the computer
C. Buteau, E. Muller, Neil Marshall, A. Sacristán, Joyce Mgombelo (2016)
Undergraduate Mathematics Students Appropriating Programming as a Tool for Modelling, Simulation, and Visualization: A Case StudyDigital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2
S. Rushton (2008)
Perceptually Guided Action: A Step in the Right DirectionCurrent Biology, 18
R. Keen, R. Carrico, Monica Sylvia, N. Berthier (2003)
How infants use perceptual information to guide actionDevelopmental Science, 6
G. Lakoff, R. Núñez (2002)
Where mathematics comes from : how the embodied mind brings mathematics into beingAmerican Mathematical Monthly, 109
F. Marton (2014)
Necessary Conditions of Learning
[In this paper we argue that a well structured robotics inquiry can lead to what Pirie and Kieren (Educ Stud Math 26:165–190, 1994a; Learn Math 14:39–43, 1994b) called growth in mathematical understanding. In particular we offer that such structuring is a means to encourage processes of syntonic appropriation as introduced by Papert (Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. http://worrydream.com/refs/Papert-Mindstorms1st ed.pdf, 1980). We start with the observation that some mathematical concepts are introduced to learners in ways that are disassociated from learners’ bodies, experiences and/or culture(s). In our work students, teachers, researchers, tasks and technologies are dynamically coupled and provide feedback to each other.]
Published: Dec 11, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.