Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Memory and Postwar MemorialsThe Nuremberg Trials as Cold War Competition: The Politics of the Historical Record and the International Stage

Memory and Postwar Memorials: The Nuremberg Trials as Cold War Competition: The Politics of the... [We are all familiar with the standard Western account of the Nuremberg Trials of 1945 to 1946. It is a victors’ narrative, celebrating the triumph of truth, justice, and essential liberal values, such as the rule of law, over evil. In the most famous versions US Chief Justice Robert Jackson with his forceful personality and no-nonsense manner shines as the hero of the moment, insisting on a fair trial for even the most monstrous Nazi leaders as “the American way” and countering the demands of the Soviet Union, as well as his own colleague Henry Morgenthau, for a program of reparations that would include the use of German forced labor for postwar reconstruction in the Allied countries. This is a good story, but one that largely leaves out the contribution and perspective of one of the major Allied victors—the Soviet Union.1 In the West the critical role of the Soviet Union as a shaper of and participant in the International Military Tribunal (IMT), first informally and then as one of the four countries of the prosecution, had until recently been almost willfully forgotten. To be sure, there were practical reasons for this omission. For decades critical Soviet documents about the Nuremberg Trials were buried in the former Soviet archives, and even Russian researchers had limited access.2 But there were deep political reasons as well. First, the Soviet Union was regarded by its wartime allies not just as a victor, but also as a rival.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Memory and Postwar MemorialsThe Nuremberg Trials as Cold War Competition: The Politics of the Historical Record and the International Stage

Part of the Studies in European Culture and History Book Series
Editors: Silberman, Marc; Vatan, Florence
Hirsch, Francine
Memory and Postwar Memorials — Oct 28, 2015
Download PDF
15 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/memory-and-postwar-memorials-the-nuremberg-trials-as-cold-war-GCMwsejg2D

References (6)

Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan US
Copyright
© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2013
ISBN
978-1-349-46574-3
Pages
15 –30
DOI
10.1057/9781137343529_2
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[We are all familiar with the standard Western account of the Nuremberg Trials of 1945 to 1946. It is a victors’ narrative, celebrating the triumph of truth, justice, and essential liberal values, such as the rule of law, over evil. In the most famous versions US Chief Justice Robert Jackson with his forceful personality and no-nonsense manner shines as the hero of the moment, insisting on a fair trial for even the most monstrous Nazi leaders as “the American way” and countering the demands of the Soviet Union, as well as his own colleague Henry Morgenthau, for a program of reparations that would include the use of German forced labor for postwar reconstruction in the Allied countries. This is a good story, but one that largely leaves out the contribution and perspective of one of the major Allied victors—the Soviet Union.1 In the West the critical role of the Soviet Union as a shaper of and participant in the International Military Tribunal (IMT), first informally and then as one of the four countries of the prosecution, had until recently been almost willfully forgotten. To be sure, there were practical reasons for this omission. For decades critical Soviet documents about the Nuremberg Trials were buried in the former Soviet archives, and even Russian researchers had limited access.2 But there were deep political reasons as well. First, the Soviet Union was regarded by its wartime allies not just as a victor, but also as a rival.]

Published: Oct 28, 2015

Keywords: Foreign Affair; Western Power; Soviet Leader; Holocaust Denial; International Military Tribunal

There are no references for this article.