Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Toulmin, Richard Rieke, A. Janik (1979)
An introduction to reasoning
Wayne Brockriede, Douglas Ehninger (1960)
Toulmin on argument: An interpretation and applicationQuarterly Journal of Speech, 46
A. Rocci (2007)
Epistemic modality and questions in dialogue. The case of Italian interrogative constructions in the subjunctive mood
A. Kratzer (2012)
Modals and Conditionals
A. Rocci (2008)
Modality and its Conversational Backgrounds in the Reconstruction of ArgumentationArgumentation, 22
M. Vorobej (2006)
A Theory of Argument
R. Pinto (2001)
Generalizing the Notion of Argument
P. Brandt (1996)
From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structureJournal of Pragmatics, 25
Eric Swanson (2006)
Interactions with context
F. Nauze (2008)
Modality in typological perspective
F. Eemeren, P. Houtlosser, A. Henkemans (2007)
Argumentative Indicators in Discourse, A Pragma-Dialectical Study, 12
L. Barbaresi (1987)
“OBVIOUSLY” AND “CERTAINLY”: TWO DIFFERENT FUNCTIONS IN ARGUMENTATIVE DISCOURSEFolia Linguistica, 21
R. Carnap (1951)
Logical foundations of probability
John Smith, W. Kneale (1950)
Probability and Induction
D. Walton, E. Krabbe (1995)
Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning
F. Eemeren, R. Grootendorst (1984)
Speech acts in argumentative discussions
Nicholas Asher, A. Lascarides (2005)
Logics of Conversation
Paolo Fait (2004)
Aristotle on a Puzzle about Logical Consequence: Necessity of Being vs. Necessity of SayingTopoi, 23
F. Eemeren, R. Grootendorst (2003)
A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: References
Jan Łukasiewicz (1957)
Aristotle's Syllogistic From the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic
Jacques Mœschler (1992)
The pragmatic aspects of linguistic negation: Speech act, argumentation and pragmatic inferenceArgumentation, 6
D. Blakemore (2006)
Divisions of labour: The analysis of parentheticalsLingua, 116
Amie Thomasson (2002)
Phenomenology and the Development of Analytic PhilosophySouthern Journal of Philosophy, 40
J. Austin (1975)
How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955
L. Bermejo-Luque (2011)
Giving Reasons, A Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory, 20
J. Freeman (1991)
Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments
J. Freeman (1988)
Thinking Logically: Basic Concepts for Reasoning
G. Lakoff (1973)
Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy conceptsJournal of Philosophical Logic, 2
S. Toulmin (1960)
The uses of argument
A. Kratzer (2012)
Modals and ConditionalsNew and Revised Perspectives
E. Rigotti, Sara Morasso (2010)
Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to Other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material ComponentsArgumentation, 24
D. Hitchcock, Bart Verheij (2010)
Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and EvaluationSpringer US
T. Burge, P. Grice (1989)
Studies in the Way of Words.The Philosophical Quarterly, 40
F. Récanati (1989)
The Pragmatics of What is SaidMind & Language, 4
J. Freeman (2011)
Argument Structure: Representation and Theory, 18
J. Searle (1969)
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language
K. Hengeveld (1988)
Illocution, Mood and Modality in a Functional Grammar of SpanishJ. Semant., 6
(1990)
From Etymology to Pragmatics: Subject index
N. Rescher (2006)
Presumption and the practices of tentative cognition
R. Hare (1970)
Meaning and Speech ActsThe Philosophical Review, 79
Vernon Robbins, H. Räisänen (2003)
To appear in
A. Tseronis (2009)
Qualifying Standpoints: Stance adverbs as a presentational device for managing the burden of proof
H. Nølke, Kjersti Fløttum, Coco Norén (2004)
ScaPoLine : La théorie scandinave de la polyphonie linguistique
A. Klinge (2002)
Modality: Issues in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface: Anna Papafragou, Vol. 6. Elsevier Science, Oxford, 2000. ix+239 pp. $89.00Journal of Pragmatics, 34
O. Ducrot (1993)
A quoi sert le concept de modalité
M. Dascal (2003)
Interpretation and understanding
E. Ifantidou-trouki (1993)
Sentential adverbs and relevanceLingua, 90
V. Hacquard, Alexis Wellwood (2012)
Embedding epistemic modals in English: A corpus-based studySemantics and Pragmatics, 5
M. Gatti (2005)
Prefazione a A. Rocci, La modalità epistemica tra semantica e argomentazione,I.S.U., Milano 2005
D. Braine (1974)
TIME AND NECESSITYPhilosophical Books, 15
Bart Verheij (2006)
Arguing on the Toulmin Model, 10
H. EemerenvanF., P. Houtlosser (2002)
Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discoursePhotochemistry and Photobiology
P. Kay (1997)
Words and the grammar of context, 40
A. Goldberg (1995)
Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure
P. Houtlosser (1994)
The speech act 'advancing a standpoint'
J. Anscombre, O. Ducrot (1976)
L'argumentation dans la langueLangages, 10
Hans Kronning (2014)
La théorie modale de la polyphonie et les constructions conditionnelles prédictives en siLangages, 193
William Marshall, M. Black, P. Geach (1953)
Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege
J. Nuyts (2001)
Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective
J. Nuyts (2001)
Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressionsJournal of Pragmatics, 33
Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca (1992)
Analysing Complex Argumentation: The Reconstruction of Multiple and Coordinatively Compound Argumentation in a Critical Discussion
(1949)
The Concept of Mind
D. Blakemore (1997)
On Non-Truth Conditional Meaning
[The chapter reads as an original contribution to the exegesis of Toulmin’s The Uses of ArgumentArgumentation, argument, arguer. It examines this modern classic of argumentationArgumentation, argument, arguer theory from the scarcely explored perspective of modalitymodality unveiling some latent inconsistencies in the fabric of the book and proposing some new interpretations of the key elements of the Toulmin modelToulmin model. The chapter also considers the reception of Toulmin’s ideas on modality in later studies, as well as their relation to current contributions to argumentationArgumentation, argument, arguer theory and linguistics.]
Published: Mar 9, 2017
Keywords: Qualifier Qualifier; Propositional Content; Logical Type; Doxastic Attitude; Argumentative Discussion
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.