Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[This chapter examines Stanley Cavell’s suggestion – put forward in his Carus Lectures of 1988 – that Samuel Beckett’s Endgame can be read as a work which embodies and develops the idea of Emersonian moral perfectionism. While this suggestion is never fully substantiated by Cavell himself, it is, as I hope to demonstrate here, possible to provide an account of what a perfectionist Endgame might look like by drawing on a range of Cavell’s texts, from his early essay on Endgame through to his recent study Cities of Words. In the second part of the chapter, I turn the tables somewhat. After demarcating some of the social limits of Cavell’s ethical outlook, I ask what it might mean to rediscover perfectionism in a more politicized form – something which I attempt to do via an exploration of the tragic dimensions of Beckett’s play.]
Published: Dec 16, 2016
Keywords: Moral Life; Sorites Paradox; Moral Perfectionism; European Philosopher; Critical Gravity
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.