Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[This chapter lays out the first part of the initial case of Tunisia, which represents a case of successfully pacted (though not consolidated) democracy. It provides the historical context necessary to rebut shallow hypotheses claiming that Tunisians crafted a post-revolutionary democracy after the Jasmine Revolution because they inherited a culture of alleged moderation, or had undergone deep secularization in the preceding decades. Rejecting such Tunisian exceptionalism, it instead contends that Tunisia’s prior development from French colonialism through the regime of Habib Bourguiba did deposit several structural conditions that would later be important for pacting. One was polarization, resulting from the Tunisian party-state’s intolerance to Islamism; another was parity, meaning that both Tunisian Islamists through Ennahda and its democratic opposition were equally weak. In addition, Tunisia also featured a relatively small military, well-organized civil society, and coherent national discourse that allowed all Tunisians to see one another as citizens—but nonetheless did not resolve fundamental disagreements about the role of religion in politics.]
Published: May 18, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.