Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[This study considers some Italian lazarettos that were not situated in port cities, offering an environmental perspective on peri-urban spaces involved in urban plague control rather than customary contagionist views of plague. Pesthouses entailed high costs to communities, whether they rented and outfitted available suburban properties or instead undertook the massive expenditures to design and build great structures de novo. Were they worth the investments? Did pesthouses ‘work’ to constrain and contain plague mortality? While historical evidence cannot answer such questions definitively, this chapter argues that extramural confinement zones did not remove ongoing plague risks from cities and towns that used them, largely because plague was not and is not transmitted person-to-person. The built fabric of early modern plague management disappeared with urban expansion and infrastructure modernisation, such that little remained when plague’s ‘Third Pandemic’ unfolded. Yet the contagionist view of premodern plagues endures. We can now re-see former landscapes of plague, from above and underground.]
Published: Jul 30, 2021
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.