Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Poincaré, Philosopher of ScienceThe Third Way Epistemology: A Re-characterization of Poincaré’s Conventionalism

Poincaré, Philosopher of Science: The Third Way Epistemology: A Re-characterization of Poincaré’s... [The aim of this paper is to clarify some crucial aspects of PoincaréPoincaré’s philosophy of science, and especially the notion of ‘conventionconvention’. This will lead to a better understanding of the differing interpretations of his views that have been proposed, and to a reassessment of the conventionalist philosophy of science 100 years after Poincaré’s passing. The first section presents a short contextualization of conventionalismconventionalism with the nineteenth century philosophical landscape. In the second one, we briefly expose two conflicting ways of interpreting Poincaré’s conventionalism regarding natural science, that is, physicsphysics and mechanicsmechanics. In the third section, the core of this paper, we analyze the different concepts of convention that are found in Poincaré’s works. Finally, we offer some concluding remarks on Poincaré’s views in light of present-day philosophical concerns.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Poincaré, Philosopher of ScienceThe Third Way Epistemology: A Re-characterization of Poincaré’s Conventionalism

Part of the The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science Book Series (volume 79)
Editors: de Paz, María; DiSalle, Robert

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/poincar-philosopher-of-science-the-third-way-epistemology-a-re-aTUnSIuVJd

References (22)

Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014
ISBN
978-94-017-8779-6
Pages
47 –65
DOI
10.1007/978-94-017-8780-2_3
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[The aim of this paper is to clarify some crucial aspects of PoincaréPoincaré’s philosophy of science, and especially the notion of ‘conventionconvention’. This will lead to a better understanding of the differing interpretations of his views that have been proposed, and to a reassessment of the conventionalist philosophy of science 100 years after Poincaré’s passing. The first section presents a short contextualization of conventionalismconventionalism with the nineteenth century philosophical landscape. In the second one, we briefly expose two conflicting ways of interpreting Poincaré’s conventionalism regarding natural science, that is, physicsphysics and mechanicsmechanics. In the third section, the core of this paper, we analyze the different concepts of convention that are found in Poincaré’s works. Finally, we offer some concluding remarks on Poincaré’s views in light of present-day philosophical concerns.]

Published: Mar 12, 2014

Keywords: Mechanic Mechanic; Linguistic Convention; Decision Decision; Natural Hypothesis; Truth Truth

There are no references for this article.