Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Hamilton (2018)
Self-assessed understanding of climate changeClimatic Change, 151
M. Hornsey, K. Fielding (2017)
Attitude Roots and Jiu Jitsu Persuasion: Understanding and Overcoming the Motivated Rejection of ScienceAmerican Psychologist, 72
L. Hamilton (2016)
Where Is the North Pole? An Election-Year Survey on Global Change
K. Crowley, J. Moon, R. Herr, C. Milne, S. Tanner, S. Felton, I. Beckett, M. Zwart, T. McCall, B. Davis, J. Kirkpatrick, J. Homeshaw (2012)
Minority Government: The Liberal Green experience in Tasmania.
A. McCright, R. Dunlap (2011)
The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public's Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010The Sociological Quarterly, 52
(2018)
Australian survey of social attitudes 2018
J. Besley, Andrea Tanner (2011)
What Science Communication Scholars Think About Training Scientists to CommunicateScience Communication, 33
W. Poortinga, A. Spence, L. Whitmarsh, S. Capstick, N. Pidgeon (2011)
Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate changeGlobal Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 21
S. Lewandowsky, K. Oberauer (2016)
Motivated Rejection of ScienceCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 25
B. Hayes (2001)
Gender, Scientific Knowledge, and Attitudes toward the Environment: A Cross-National AnalysisPolitical Research Quarterly, 54
N. Oreskes (2004)
The Scientific Consensus on Climate ChangeScience, 306
P. Ehret, A. Sparks, D. Sherman (2017)
Support for environmental protection: an integration of ideological-consistency and information-deficit modelsEnvironmental Politics, 26
L. Hamilton (2015)
Polar facts in the age of polarizationPolar Geography, 38
L. Hamilton, L. Fogg (2019)
Physical-World Knowledge and Public Views on Climate Change
B. Tranter, Jonathan Smith (2018)
The mother of all effects? Stability and change in Greens party identification in AustraliaEnvironmental Politics, 28
S. Lewandowsky, N. Oreskes, J. Risbey, B. Newell, M. Smithson (2015)
Seepage: Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific communityGlobal Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 33
P. Doran, M. Zimmerman (2009)
Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate ChangeEos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 90
Thomas Dietz, Amy Dan, R. Shwom (2007)
Support for Climate Change Policy: Social Psychological and Social Structural Influences*Rural Sociology, 72
B. Suldovsky (2016)
In science communication, why does the idea of the public deficit always return? Exploring key influencesPublic Understanding of Science, 25
D. Guber (2013)
A Cooling Climate for Change? Party Polarization and the Politics of Global WarmingAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 57
L. Hamilton, J. Hartter, Mary Lemcke-Stampone, David Moore, Thomas Safford (2015)
Tracking Public Beliefs About Anthropogenic Climate ChangePLoS ONE, 10
T. Brooking, D. Hutton, L. Connors (2000)
A History of the Australian Environment MovementEnvironmental History, 105
Lynnette Zelezny, Poh-Pheng Chua, C. Aldrich (2000)
New Ways of Thinking about Environmentalism: Elaborating on Gender Differences in EnvironmentalismJournal of Social Issues, 56
Lynnette Zelezny, C. Aldrich (2000)
Elaborating on Gender Differences in Environmentalism
J. Besley, M. Nisbet (2013)
How scientists view the public, the media and the political processPublic Understanding of Science, 22
D. Kahan (2015)
Climate-Science Communication and the Measurement ProblemPolitical Psychology, 36
B. Tranter (2011)
Political divisions over climate change and environmental issues in AustraliaEnvironmental Politics, 20
B. Tranter (2017)
It’s only natural: conservatives and climate change in AustraliaEnvironmental Sociology, 3
J. Cook, D. Nuccitelli, Sarah Green, M. Richardson, Bärbel Winkler, Rob Painting, R. Way, P. Jacobs, A. Skuce (2013)
Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literatureEnvironmental Research Letters, 8
B. Tranter (2014)
Social and political influences on environmentalism in AustraliaJournal of Sociology, 50
Matthew Levendusky (2009)
The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans
D. Kammen, G. Wright (2013)
Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature
Joanna Huxster, Matthew Slater, J. Leddington, Victor LoPiccolo, Jeffrey Bergman, Mack Jones, Caroline McGlynn, Nicolas Diaz, N. Aspinall, Julia Bresticker, Melissa Hopkins (2018)
Understanding “understanding” in Public Understanding of SciencePublic Understanding of Science, 27
Ashley Ross, Stella Rouse, W. Mobley (2019)
Polarization of Climate Change Beliefs: The Role of the Millennial Generation IdentitySocial Science Quarterly
A. Bettini (2014)
About ``scientific consensus on climate change''Europhysics News, 45
Marc Hetherington (2001)
Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite PolarizationAmerican Political Science Review, 95
(2013)
Trends in Australian political opinion: results from the Australian Election Study 1987-2016 School of Politics and International Relations
LSU Digital Commons LSU Digital Commons Consensus on consensus: A synthesis of consensus estimates Consensus on consensus: A synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming on human-caused global warming
A. McCright (2010)
The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American publicPopulation and Environment, 32
Charles Taber, M. Lodge (2006)
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political BeliefsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 50
Ziva Kunda (1990)
The case for motivated reasoning.Psychological bulletin, 108 3
B. Tranter (2020)
Does Public Knowledge of Climate Change Really Matter in Australia?*Environmental Communication, 14
K. Fielding, B. Head, Warren Laffan, M. Western, O. Hoegh‐Guldberg (2012)
Australian politicians’ beliefs about climate change: political partisanship and political ideologyEnvironmental Politics, 21
Thad Kousser, B. Tranter (2018)
The influence of political leaders on climate change attitudesGlobal Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 50
B. Tranter, K. Booth (2015)
Scepticism in a changing climate: A cross-national studyGlobal Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 33
Robert Brulle, Jason Carmichael, J. Jenkins (2012)
Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010Climatic Change, 114
A. McCright, R. Dunlap (2011)
Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United StatesGlobal Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 21
P. Kraft, M. Lodge, Charles Taber (2015)
Why People “Don’t Trust the Evidence”The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658
B. Tranter (2007)
Political Knowledge and its Partisan ConsequencesAustralian Journal of Political Science, 42
W. Anderegg, James Prall, J. Harold, S. Schneider (2010)
Expert credibility in climate changeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107
Political polarisation over anthropogenic climate change (ACC) is an important barrier to climate action in countries such as Australia and the USA. Given the rising concerns expressed by younger people globally over the existential threat posed by global warming, are political divisions over climate change lessening among young people? Are young Australians more knowledgeable about climate change than their elders, and to what extent does knowledge influence their climate attitudes? We explore these questions with recent survey data from a cohort of young Australians (aged 26) living in Queensland and national data from the 2018 Australian Survey of Social Attitudes. We find that younger Australians are not more knowledgeable about climate change than older Australians. However, knowledge of climate change is associated with greater acceptance of ACC among younger Australians. Social and political factors are also important. Young men score higher on climate knowledge than young women, but men are less likely than women to accept that climate change has human causes. Those with vocational education score lower than others on climate knowledge and are also less likely to believe in ACC. While younger Australians are likelier to accept ACC than older Australians, political party allegiance remains the strongest influence upon the attitudes of young people, with Liberal and National Party identifiers far less likely than others to accept ACC, even after controlling for social background and climate knowledge. This research suggests that politics remains the greatest barrier to real action on climate change, even among younger Australians.
Journal of Applied Youth Studies – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 10, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.