Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Harten (1983)
On the symmetric form of systems of conservation laws with entropyJournal of Computational Physics, 49
B. Leer (1997)
Towards the Ultimate Conservative Difference SchemeJournal of Computational Physics, 135
Vidar Stiernström, M. Almquist, K. Mattsson (2023)
Boundary-optimized summation-by-parts operators for finite difference approximations of second derivatives with variable coefficientsJ. Comput. Phys., 491
M. Deb, I. Babuska, J. Oden (2001)
Solution of stochastic partial differential equations using Galerkin finite element techniquesComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 190
Per Pettersson, G. Iaccarino, J. Nordström (2013)
An intrusive hybrid method for discontinuous two-phase flow under uncertaintyComputers & Fluids, 86
Per Pettersson, G. Iaccarino, J. Nordström (2009)
Numerical analysis of the Burgers' equation in the presence of uncertaintyJ. Comput. Phys., 228
Bkam Leer, B. Leer (1979)
Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's methodJournal of Computational Physics, 32
M. Gerritsen, P. Olsson (1996)
Designing an efficient solution strategy for fluid flows. 1. A stable high order finite difference scheme and sharp shock resolution for the Euler equationsJournal of Computational Physics, 129
B. Strand (1994)
Summation by parts for finite difference approximations for d/dxJournal of Computational Physics, 110
Heng Li, Dongxiao Zhang (2009)
Efficient and Accurate Quantification of Uncertainty for Multiphase Flow With the Probabilistic Collocation MethodSpe Journal, 14
S. Gottlieb, Chi-Wang Shu (1998)
Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemesMath. Comput., 67
Qian Chen, D. Gottlieb, J. Hesthaven (2005)
Uncertainty analysis for the steady-state flows in a dual throat nozzleJournal of Computational Physics, 204
M. Carpenter, J. Nordström, D. Gottlieb (1999)
A Stable and Conservative Interface Treatment of Arbitrary Spatial AccuracyJournal of Computational Physics, 148
B. Debusschere, H. Najm, P. Pébay, O. Knio, R. Ghanem, O. Maître (2005)
Numerical Challenges in the Use of Polynomial Chaos Representations for Stochastic ProcessesSIAM J. Sci. Comput., 26
C. Schwab, S. Tokareva (2013)
High order approximation of probabilistic shock profiles in hyperbolic conservation laws with uncertain initial dataMathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 47
D. Xiu, G. Karniadakis (2002)
The Wiener-Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential EquationsSIAM J. Sci. Comput., 24
H. Kreiss, G. Scherer (1974)
Finite Element and Finite Difference Methods for Hyperbolic Partial Differential Equations
Sofia Eriksson, Q. Abbas, J. Nordström (2011)
A stable and conservative method for locally adapting the design order of finite difference schemesJ. Comput. Phys., 230
Q. Abbas, E. Weide, J. Nordström (2009)
Accurate and stable calculations involving shocks using a new hybrid scheme
Mike Chen, A. Keller, Zhen Lu, D. Zhang, G. Zyvoloski (2008)
Uncertainty Quantification for Multiphase Flow in Random Porous Media Using KL-Based Moment Equation Approaches
C. Pettit, P. Beran (2006)
Spectral and multiresolution Wiener expansions of oscillatory stochastic processesJournal of Sound and Vibration, 294
J. Haas, B. Sturtevant (1987)
Interaction of weak shock waves with cylindrical and spherical gas inhomogeneitiesJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 181
A. Harten, P. Lax, B. Leer (1983)
On Upstream Differencing and Godunov-Type Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation LawsSiam Review, 25
G. Sod (1978)
A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation lawsJournal of Computational Physics, 27
[In this chapter, we investigate a two-phase flow generalization of the Euler equations. A symmetrized problem formulation that generalizes previous energy estimates in for the Euler equations is used for the stochastic Galerkin system. The solution is expected to develop non-smooth features that are localized in space. Consequently, we adapt the numerical method to the smoothness of the solution. Finite-difference operators in summation-by-parts (SBP) form are used for the high-order spatial discretization, and the HLL-flux and MUSCL reconstruction are employed for shock-capturing in the non-smooth region. The coupling between the different solution regions is performed with a weak imposition of the interface conditions through an interface using a penalty technique.]
Published: Sep 17, 2014
Keywords: Euler Equation; Hybrid Scheme; Deterministic Problem; Stochastic Mode; Stochastic Collocation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.