Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media comment on the teaching performance assessment

Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media comment on the teaching performance... In Australia, the Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA) is a relatively new, man- datory hurdle which must be completed just prior to the graduation stage of ini- tial teacher education (ITE) programmes. This high-stakes task is one of a grow- ing number of requirements to come out of the standards and accountability regime as outlined in the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) document for accreditation for ITE programmes. We delve into the public commen- tary about the broader commission of preservice and graduate teacher quality in general and the TPA in particular. We draw on Bernstein’s pedagogic identities and deductively apply this theory to explore this phenomenon. We use a data set of pub- licly available legacy media and social media tweets made over a ten-month period from August 2019 to May 2020 to reveal the focus, inherent bias and pedagogic identities promoted by these public discourses. The paper concludes with discussion about the implications of these drivers on the public perception of quality in ITE and on the status of teaching more broadly. Keywords Teaching performance assessment · Initial teacher education · Accreditation · Legacy media · Social media · Teacher quality * Donna Pendergast d.pendergast@griffith.edu.au Beryl Exley b.exley@griffith.edu.au Frances Hoyte f.hoyte@griffith.edu.au School of Education and Professional Studies, Griffith University, Mount Gravatt, QLD, Australia Vol.:(0123456789) 1 3 D. Pendergast et al. Initial teacher education in context According to UNESCO, the last few years has evidenced the continual global ‘preoccupation’ with teacher education, recruitment, retention, professional sta- tus and working conditions for teachers (UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2020). There is also an estimated shortfall of 69 million teachers to achieve the universal goal of primary and secondary education by 2030 (UNESCO Institute for Statis- tics, 2020). Throughout the world, teacher education institutes, the school sys- tems who employ graduate teachers, and the regulatory authorities who accredit teacher education programmes are all drawing on a range of policy, accountabil- ity, practice, research and equity ‘turns’ (Cochrane-Smith, 2016; Goodwin, 2020; Zeichner, 2020) to remodel teacher education. The re-imagining of teacher educa- tion in Australia is one response to teacher shortages, the effects of which are dra- matic, with workforce shortfalls in all school systems in all states and territories of Australia (see Singhal, 2019, April 21). A convergence of factors contributes to teacher shortages, including increased population, a decline in applicants to ITE, and public commentary about the low status of and declining morale within the profession (Commonwealth of Australia, 2019; Exley et  al., 2022). Despite the fact that many issues contribute to teacher shortages, initial teacher education has taken the brunt of the blame in policy and public commentary (Rowan et al., 2015; White et al., 2020). Concurrently, the teaching profession in Australia is also faced with allega- tions of reduced teacher quality in response to student achievement data. Crit- ics cite plummeting performance in international comparative scales, such as the Programme for International Student Performance (PISA). Australia’s achieve- ment trends in PISA reveal a net downward spiral in all domains over more than two decades (Thomson et al., 2019). The broader commission of teacher quality is thus constantly commented upon. For instance, Carey and Hunter reported in the Sydney Morning Herald that ‘Australian students have recorded their worst ever results in an international test of reading, maths and science skills, and are now about a full school year behind where Australian students were at the turn of the millennium’ (2019, December 3, para. 1). Declining student achievement has spearheaded school- level initiatives such as implementing uniform centralised testing regimes across the country’s diverse schooling systems. Declining student achievement has resulted in more calls for accountability and standardisation ini- tiatives to improve teacher quality and ensure ‘classroom ready graduates’. Such initiatives have specifically targeted ITE. A series of government- initiated inquiries into the profession has resulted in the establishment of policy making government entities designed to shape teacher education and build accountabilities aligned with the teacher quality agenda (Allard et  al., 2014; Rowan et  al., 2015). The establishment of the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) in 2010 serves as a par- ticular marker, commencing the journey to establish (i) professional standards for teachers; and (ii) standards for ITE programmes. These standards are federally mandated requirements for programme accreditation, with ITE graduates eligible 1 3 Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media… for teacher registration and subsequently employment as a teacher. Since AITSL was established, national level inquiries have continued to focus on quality in ITE and the teaching profession more generally. The highly influential Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group’s Action Now: Classroom Ready Teach- ers (TEMAG, 2014) review made 38 key recommendations designed to renovate ITE, respond to concerns about the diminishing status of the profession, and address the attrition of novice teachers (many within 5  years of graduation). In this review, the cause of this attrition is largely framed as inadequate preparation in their ITE programme. As a result of the advice to TEMAG (AITSL, 2020, Para.1), and with extensive consultation, the Programme Standards document Accreditation of Initial Teacher Education Programmes in Australia: Standards and Procedures (AITSL, 2018), was developed in 2011 and revised in 2018, with accreditation overseen by the state-based authority. These standards comprise a suite of mandatory requirements including academic and non-academic selection criteria for programme entry (Pro- gramme Standard 3.2), the Literacy and Numeracy Test for Initial Teacher Educa- tion (Programme Standard 3.5), English language proficiency requirements (Pro- gramme Standard 3.6), and a minimum number of days of professional experience (Programme Standard 5.2). Another mandatory requirement is an exit hurdle task that demonstrates readiness for teaching—the Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA). The establishment of a TPA requirement in Australia follows international trends to replace written licensure tests to document the readiness of graduate teach- ers to enter the classroom. For example, a version of the TPA was first piloted in California in 2004, and then mandated for newly enrolled preservice teachers from 2008 (Campbell et  al., 2016). Since this time, the Californian TPA has been rede- signed and renamed as the Fresno Assessment of Student Teachers (FAST), and the Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT). Common across all ver- sions is a focus on the assessment of the graduate teacher’s planning, instruction and assessment of their own practices and students’ learning (Campbell et al., 2016). Our focus in this article is on the public commentary around one specific initia- tive in ITE, the introduction of a TPA in Australia. In the next section, we introduce the background information about the TPA initiative. We then locate and analyse the mentions of this initiative in publicly available legacy media and social media tweets over a 10-month period. We draw on Bernstein’s (2000) pedagogic identities and deductively explore this phenomenon. Our analysis demonstrates the misunder- standing that exists, and we examine why some stakeholders lack a voice on this matter. We close by commenting on the possible repercussions of the public’s per- ception of the TPA on ITE and graduate teacher quality. Teaching Performance Assessments in Australia After considerable work to design and implement TPAs in Australia (see e.g., Allard et  al., 2014; Kriewaldt et  al., 2021), these assessments are now a key component of the mandatory hurdles all ITE students complete to graduate, achieve registration and be eligible for employment. Developed in response 1 3 D. Pendergast et al. to Recommendation 28 of the TEMAG Report, ITE providers and schools are required to ‘assist pre-service teachers to develop and collect sophisticated evi- dence of their teaching ability and their impact on student learning’ (TEMAG, 2014, p. 33). The inclusion of a TPA in ITE programmes enables providers to meet Programme  Standard 1.2 which specifies that ‘Program and assessment design ensures pre-service teachers successfully complete a final-year teaching performance assessment prior to graduation’ (AITSL, 2018, p. 12). On their web- site, AITSL (2022) explains that a TPA is: a tool used to assess the practical skills and knowledge of pre-service teach- ers. Pre-service teachers collect evidence of practice to complete a TPA in the final year of their initial teacher education programme. It is assessed by ITE providers and is a requirement of graduation. (AITSL, 2022, “What is a teaching performance assessment?” section) Since their inception, TPAs have continued to come under scrutiny as part of pol- icy reviews of ITE. Attracting and selecting high quality candidates and preparing ITE students to be effective teachers was the focus of the Quality Initial Teacher Education (QITE) review (Tudge, 2021). The resulting report, Next steps: Report of the Quality Initial Teacher Education Review (Australian Government, 2021) emphasised the value of the TPAs, stating they were: regarded as the most significant outcome of the TEMAG Review reforms, with the most potential to improve the quality of ITE programmes and pro- duce graduate teachers with the skills, knowledge and practices to be suc- cessful when they enter the classroom. (Australian Government, 2021, p. 44) By the end of 2021 all TPAs utilised in Australian ITE achieved endorsement. An estimated 25,000 preservice teachers attempt one of the 12 approved TPAs each year. The two most widely used are the Graduate Teacher Performance Assess- ment (GTPA) led by the Australian Catholic University, and the Assessment for Graduate Teaching (AfGT) led by Melbourne University. The GTPA requires ITE students to teach a significant learning sequence with clear learning goals and differentiation for individual learners and small groups. ITE students must dem- onstrate planning, teaching, assessing, reflecting and appraising practices (Aus- tralian Catholic University [ACU], 2018). A validated, quality assured assess- ment process combines internal and external moderation with common standards across all 18 participating providers. Likewise, the AfGT brings together 14 insti- tutions and requires demonstration of planning for learning and teaching; analys- ing teaching practice; assessing for impact on student learning; and expanding practice. Together, these two TPAs account for the majority of higher education institutions (32 of 47), with the remaining TPAs a combination of small consortia and TPAs produced by individual higher education providers. As well as emphasising the importance of TPAs, the Next Steps report (Aus- tralian Government, 2021) identified challenges with the early implementation, concluding that various stakeholders claimed that a lack of consistency in quality 1 3 Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media… was ‘limiting the potential impact of TPAs’ (Australian Government, 2021, p. 44). The report recommended a ‘strengthening’ of TPAs through ‘national setting and moderation and comparability’ (p. 54). The goal of ‘classroom readiness’ was to be achieved through more accountability and tighter control of the range of TPAs, with decision-making power given to a new, external ‘governance board’, limi- tations on provider attempts to have their TPA endorsed, and more government funding to support the two major TPAs (Australian Government, 2021, p. 54). The introduction of TPAs is a complex move in the ITE space. On one hand, TPAs can facilitate comparability and accountability imposed on ITE by external forces, supporting what Rowe (2017) describes as the ‘market responsive’ approach, as opposed to the ‘capacity building’ approach favoured in Finland (p. 7). On the other hand, TPAs offer the potential for higher education providers to have input into the design and content of this capstone task. Allard et  al. (2014) suggest that ITE providers have had a major role in creating and implementing the task and that this has given them some agency in preparing and assessing graduates (see also Lough- land & Bostwick, 2022). Additionally, the major TPA tasks in Australia provide pre- service teachers with the type of task that has potential to reflect the complexity of teaching, that is, contextualised problem solving, requiring engagement with theory, reflection, and a repertoire of teaching skills (Reid, 2019). Market‑oriented thinking The approach to both ITE and school education in Australia has been described by Rowe (2017) as ‘market-oriented’ (p. 7), that is, relying on standardisation and test- ing to measure performance. The trend towards standardisation is evident in school- ing (Simpson Reeves et al., 2018), and in teacher education via the implementation of high stakes tasks for certification and in government control of accreditation pro- cesses for teacher education programmes (Cochrane-Smith et  al., 2017; Goodwin, 2020). Scholes et  al. (2017) note that in the Australian context, a strong focus on teacher quality has thwarted a consideration of other factors that may influence student achievement such as socioeconomic backgrounds, ethnicity, refugee sta- tus and gender, and students’ geographic location. The overriding power of dis- course of teacher quality also pertains to the ITE space, with the recent focus in the TEMAG and QITE reviews on the quality of graduate teachers, and a philosophical commitment to a market-oriented stance demonstrated through the further ‘strengthening’ of elements such as the TPA. The push for standardisa- tion of content in ITE and benchmark testing to measure preservice and graduate teacher performance is the foundation of the new accreditation processes for ITE programmes across the country. As a consequence, ‘many recent reforms target classroom teacher quality and readiness’ (Rowe, 2017, p. 7). These reforms have been enacted in Australia via the accreditation requirements mandated by AITSL, specifically increasing accountability and establishing a range of standards that reinforce market-oriented thinking. Given this market-oriented model driving 1 3 D. Pendergast et al. education policy makers in Australia, we are keen to delve deeper into the pub- lic’s understanding of TPAs as arguably the strongest lever in the ITE reforms. Public commentary Our examination of the legacy media (which include, for example, online news- papers, Canter, 2018) and social media comment on the TPA sits against a back- drop of public commentary on preservice and graduate teacher quality in Aus- tralia and elsewhere. Comments about the TPA have potential to become part of the broader public conversation about the teaching profession (Exley et al., 2022). Since the digitalisation of media, and the burgeoning access to the Internet, this public commentary on ITE quality has proliferated in disparate ways. Commen- tary, written by journalists and featured in the legacy media, provides limited opportunity for readers and other stakeholders to challenge dominant discourses, which often drive negative public opinion about ITE quality in Australia (Keogh & Garrick, 2011) and internationally (see Goodwin, 2020). Baroutsis and Lingard (2019) also highlighted the propensity with which the mainstream media in Aus- tralia constructs education as being in crisis and successes as being atypical. While commentary via social media allows individual citizens and stakeholder representatives to engage in a/synchronous banter from which journalists are typically left out (Canter, 2018), other factors have been found to constrain the teaching profession’s engagement in these discussions. Pendergast et  al. (2019) analysed three publicly accessible blog posts about teacher professionalism in Australia in 2018. The general public, activist groups and publishing compa- nies joined the discussion about teacher professionalism, but many teachers and school leaders were ‘rendered voiceless by their employers’ in this space. Being active on social media was considered ‘time-consuming, intellectually and emo- tionally exhausting, and at times, risky business’ (Pendergast et al., 2019, p. 47). This latter point is reinforced by Baroutsis and Woods (2020) who reported that when an Australian teacher educator provided a professional viewpoint about a teaching matter, their @handle was bombarded with unsavoury tweets by those with an opposing viewpoint who hid behind cryptic @handles. In another case, three Australian parents who did not agree with a school’s enactment of a behav- iour management process were each found guilty in an Australian court for unfairly savaging a principal’s reputation on social media. This case made inter- national headlines as Australia’s most epic parent-teacher row EVER (Wilkie, 2020, March 2). Research by Willis and Exley (2018) found that some teachers had limited experience with social media or lacked the time and technical support to participate. For a number of reasons, teachers often lurked rather than partici- pated, meaning that within the social media mode, the voices of the profession were often mediated by a few (Exley et  al., 2022). In light of the public discus- sion of the profession, graduate teachers and ITE, we were interested to see how both these media channels respond to and represent the TPA, a recent innovation in ITE in Australia. 1 3 Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media… Theoretical framing To examine Australian public commentary on preservice and graduate teacher qual- ity generally and the TPA specifically, we drew on Bernstein’s (2000) theorisation of discourse. According to Bernstein (2000), discourses external to the higher educa- tion provider, such as discourses of the state (Hoyte et al., 2020) or discourses from major stakeholders (Exley & Kitson, 2018), prescribe and proscribe the way ITE programmes are designed, delivered and assessed. The public commentary, via both legacy and social media, is palpable and powerful in that it contributes directly and indirectly to the ebb and flow of what constitutes a quality ITE programme and a valid TPA. These understandings contribute to the shaping of the institutional iden- tity of the ITE programme. Bernstein (2000) proposes that the range of discourses may project, or give prominence to, one or more of four possible institutional identi- ties: retrospective identities, prospective identities, therapeutic identities, and market driven identities. A Retrospective Identity (RI) is projected when institutions dis-embed and de-locate criteria from the past and project them into the present programmes (Bernstein, 2000). RI discourses are dominant when, for example, an ITE pro- gramme is not modified to meet the needs of the current cohort of preservice and graduate teachers or current market imperatives. In their examination of two teacher education programmes in Australia, O’Meara and MacDonald (2004) asserted that only elite institutions with considerable reputational capital can afford to project a RI and attract academics with a strong commitment to RI who in turn perpetuate RIs. An example of RI discourses in ITE is the high stakes Literacy and Numeracy Test in Initial Teacher Education (LANTITE) which all preservice teachers must pass to graduate. A Prospective Identity (PI) is projected when institutions recontextualise crite- ria from the past alongside a neo-conservative push for social change, such as cultural, economic and technological change (Bernstein, 2000). A PI dominates in ITE programmes when the institution has the ‘desire to foreground the future career needs of teachers through the selective recontextualising of past features’ (O’Meara & MacDonald, 2004, p. 114). An example is the overt placement, within an ITE program, of Australian Professional Standard for Teachers (APST) ‘2.4 Understand and respect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to promote reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians’ (AITSL, 2018, p. 22). As Exley and Chan (2014) document, this APST usually requires new content knowledge for many preservice and graduate teachers. A Therapeutic Identity (TI) is projected when institutions give prominence to progressive pedagogies that subscribe to complex theories of personal, social and cognitive development (Bernstein, 2000). For example, if the institution builds its reputation on the formal teaching qualifications and years of experi- ence of their academic and sessional staff and advertises a focus on the personal development and actualisation of preservice and graduate teachers as individual autonomous and flexible thinking learners, then the institution would be project- ing TIs. Bernstein (2000, p. 70) explains that the power within TI discourses can 1 3 D. Pendergast et al. be disguised by ‘soft management styles and veiled hierarchies’ (2000, p. 69). TIs are expensive because time and effort are required to develop the theoretical basis; theory is not always explicit, and the outputs of the learning are difficult to standardise and thus quantify. A Market Identity (MI) is formed when institutions give priority to the local employment market requirements (Bernstein, 2000). When institutions view their work in teacher education as fulfilling a vocational role rather than a knowledge exploration role, a MI dominates. Influential market sources include systems of education and individual schools who supervise and assess preservice teachers and employ graduate teachers. When MI projections dominate, market sectors exert measures to ensure institutional compliance via funding allocations, such as mandating or banning ITE content. When MI projections are most active, ITE programmes are vulnerable to re-modelling in response to current issues, state initiatives and employment market demands (O’Meara & MacDonald, 2004). While multiple discourses circulate at any one time, one or more may gain promi- nence to drive public perceptions of preservice and graduate teachers (Rowan et al., 2015) and influence current understandings of the TPA. Bernstein (2000) and oth- ers (O’Meara & MacDonald, 2004; Pausigere & Graven, 2013) use the nomencla- ture of pedagogic identities to refer to the projection of an institutional identity and its mediation by macro, mezzo and micro level discourses. In this way, this work on pedagogic identities sits apart from other research work that explores identity in teacher development (see Beauchamp & Thomas, 2009), and in teachers’ profes- sional lives (see Olsen, 2008). The study We investigated the public discourses about the quality of Australian ITE pro- grammes and the newly introduced TPA over a 10-month period from 1 August 2019 to 31 May 2020. Our research question is: What are the discourses driving the public commentary on AITSL’s Teaching Performance Assessment task in Aus- tralia and what are the inherent implications? We investigated both legacy and social media, in recognition of the complexity of the communication landscape (Canter, 2018; Pendergast et al., 2019). Our data collection period sits between the commencement of TPAs as obliga- tory components of ITE, and before Stage 2 of Accreditation when institutions would have to start publishing the results of their TPA processes. During the first months of the study, preservice teachers were able to implement the data collec- tion, planning and teaching required to complete their TPA in face-to-face classroom contexts. With the onset of the global COVID-19 pandemic and resulting school closures (Australian Government & Department of Health, 2020), from late March 2020, preservice teachers completed an adapted TPA task, designed collaboratively by ITE providers and education systems (see Pendergast et al., 2020). The data col- lection period also includes two points in time where graduating preservice teach- ers were distributing their eportfolios and seeking employment opportunities. This 1 3 Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media… article focuses on commentary on the TPA in both its original format and also the alternative TPA. Methods Harvesting data set #1: legacy media Australian legacy media includes two national newspapers and 10 state/territory daily papers, published in print and online. Just two companies dominate ownership of the national papers, one owned by News Corp Australia (formerly News Limited) and the other by Nine Entertainment Co (formally Fairfax Media). These two com- panies also own eight of the state/territory daily newspapers. Articles for data set #1 were identified through searches on two occasions in each of two databases: the Australia New Zealand Newsstream (via the ProQuest plat- form) and the Australia and New Zealand Reference Centre (via EBSCOhost plat- form). The first set of searches covered 1 August 2019 to 31 March 2020. The sec- ond set of searches covered 1 April 2020 to 31 May 2020. Search terms included the following phrases: ‘teaching performance assessment’ and ‘teacher perfor- mance assessment’, the terms ‘TPA’, ‘teacher graduate’, ‘graduate teacher’, ‘gradu- ate teach*’, ‘preservice teachers’, and ‘teacher standards’. This variety of terms was used because the TPA is a relatively new assessment in Australia and it may have been referred to without use of its formal name. The articles located by the searches were read to identify ones about Australia that included comments relevant to the TPA. The first search in the Australia and New Zealand Newsstream (via Proquest) delivered eight relevant articles. The search in the Australia/New Zealand Refer- ence Centre (via Ebscohost) identified no additional articles. The second round of searches located one reference from the Proquest platform and one additional refer- ence from the Ebscohost platform. A total of one Letter to the Editor and 11 arti- cles comprise the legacy media data set. Five articles were from the Brisbane-based Courier Mail (News Corp), three from the Sydney Morning Herald (Nine/Fairfax Media) and one each from The Cairns Post (News Corp), the Courier (Ballarat) (News Corp), and The Age (Nine/Fairfax Media) published in Melbourne. Articles 11 and 12 were published during the time schools in some Australian states moved to online learning due to COVID restrictions. Harvesting data set #2: social media Social media posts were located using two search engines: Social Searcher and Google Twitter Search, at three points in time. The first searches covered August 2019 to March 2020 and the second covered April 2020 to June 2020. These searches used the terms ‘teacher performance assessment’, ‘graduate teacher’ and ‘teacher standards’. The Google Twitter search provided four posts and a small trail of responses. The Social Searcher tool provided two Instagram posts and a notifi- cation of a private Facebook group discussing the Graduate Teacher Performance 1 3 D. Pendergast et al. Table 1 Information on the hashtags with potential relevance for the TPA Hashtags explored TPA-related posts #afgta 3 posts #tpa Unrelated topics and TPAs in the US #graduateAQ teacher A small number only relevant to Australia #assessment for graduate teaching One post- “Miss-Happy” (pseudonym) #teacher performance assessment Two posts relevant to Australia #gtpa 46 posts relevant to Australia #teaching performance assessment 2 posts relevant to Australia Table 2 Number of #gtpa posts per month from August 2019 to June 2020 Month Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar* Apr* May* #gtpa posts 5 5 8 1 0 3 5 9 4 6 *Schools in some Australian states moved to online learning from the last week of March 2020 due to COVID restrictions Assessment (GTPA). A third search in July 2020 with the search term ‘teaching performance assessment’ located two Instagram posts from Social Searcher and six posts from the Google Twitter Search. The Instagram posts provided a rich seam of data. Both Instagram posts included a selection of hashtags which linked the post to virtual ‘noticeboards’ of other posts which were potentially on the same topic. Any given hashtag might relate to a num- ber of topics (e.g., #afgta was linked to posts about fitness and the #tpa linked to the United States versions of a teaching performance assessment). We read several of the most promising hashtag notice boards (see Table 1) to locate posts about the Australian TPA from within our timeframe. The hashtag #gtpa led to a set of 46 social media posts (see Table 2). These posts were distributed over the data collection timespan, and many were cross linked to other relevant hashtags which also revealed a small number of posts with similar content and tone. We chose to limit our discussion to the #gtpa posts because this set clear limits to the social media we discuss. In summary, the data on which we report includes 12 articles from the legacy media and the 46 social media posts under the #gtpa. Analysis of data To analyse public commentary on the TPA within the Australian ITE context we considered the dominant discourses with respect to the pedagogic identities pro- posed by Bernstein (2000). The third author conducted the first pass through data sets #1 and #2 to determine the themes that emerged, that being statements about the decline in Australia’s educational standards; the exclusive use of external testing as the measure of educational standards; the inadequacy of teachers; the reliance on 1 3 Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media… government-initiated reviews to drive reforms; the selection criteria for programme entry; and the evaluation of graduates prior to entry to the profession. In a series of face-to-face data analysis meetings, all authors read each legacy and social media article and worked deductively using the definitions and understandings of the pedagogic identity theory to note overt or implicit orientations to particular identi- ties. This allowed us to specify orientations to pedagogic identities for the topic of teacher quality. We came up with the following examples: Retrospective identities (RI) orientate to criteria from the past that are projected into the current programme (e.g., comments about applying external standards, the assumed benefits of LANTITE) Prospective identities (PI) orientate to criteria from the past aligned to social change (e.g., comments about teacher commitment or bringing about change) Therapeutic identities (TI) orientate to pedagogies subscribing to complex theo- ries of personal, social and cognitive development (e.g., comments on empathy, resilience, or creativity) Market identities (MI) orientate to the career needs of the local employment mar- ket (e.g., references to workforce demands dictating changes to teaching subject areas). Findings Analysis data set #1: legacy media The 12 legacy media articles in data set #1 had various authors: journalists (Articles 1, 7, 8, 10, 11), the Director of the Queensland College of Teachers (Articles 2/3 & 6), a State Government Minister (Article 5), a researcher (Article 4) and a private citizen who wrote a letter to the editor (Article 9). See Table 3 for information about date, publisher, headline, author, summary and identified orientations. Article 10 could not be assessed for any particular orientation and Articles 2 and 3 are the same article published in two papers. This leaves 10 articles for discussion. Important to our work in this paper, only two articles (2/3 & 6) drew attention to the TPA, both written by the Director of the Queensland College of Teachers (the regulating authority that is responsible for registration for teachers in the state of Queensland). The TPA is neither mentioned by a journalist nor other stakeholders. We pick up on this point in the analysis of data set #2. Our next observation concerns the orientations towards ITE that predominate in this suite of articles. All 10 articles had some orientation to RIs, reflecting the dominant view that quality ITE can only exist as a result of tight and conservative regulation. Nine of the 10 articles made direct reference to entry standards, some calling on entry standards to be raised and others appreciating that these bench- marks are not the sole determiner of quality teachers. Five of the articles mentioned LANTITE scores as being an important contributor to the discussion on preservice and graduate teacher quality. Four of the articles, two by journalists and two by other stakeholders, orientated only to RIs. Such an orientation provides a very narrow 1 3 D. Pendergast et al. 1 3 Table 3 Analysis of legacy media artefacts Article, Date, Source & Author Headline & summary Orientation Article 1 “Teachers could learn from report” Standards as the means to improve graduate teacher quality (RI) 1 October 2019 Release of report from NSW Auditor General: Impose standards to Sydney Morning Herald (2019) raise teacher quality Orientations to standards (RI), teachers as empathetic, adaptable & Article 2/3 “Being a teacher takes more than you might think.” 25 October 2019 “Valuing the work of teachers” resilient (TI) The Courier Mail High standards to enter the profession, including “extensive The Cairns Post professional experience, a rigorous degree, & a challenging final Fishburn (2019a, b) teaching performance assessment” Teachers need- extensive skills, deep content knowledge, creativ- ity, intelligence, empathy, adaptability & resilience” (p. 16) Article 4 “Slipping standards to blame for poor result” Standards as the means to improve graduate teacher quality (RI) 4 December 2019 “mediocre standards” for ITE The Courier Mail LANTITE Joseph (2019) benchmarks for ITE entry ensure rigorous ITE content Article 5 “Recognise that marks matter to stop 20-year education slide” Standards as the means to improve graduate teacher quality (RI) 7 December 2019 PISA results Sydney Morning Herald ATAR entry scores Mitchell (2019) “poor university marks” Article 6 “Rest assured, Queensland’s teachers are the best” Orientations to standards (RI), passion to make a difference (PI), & 17 January 2020 Entry scores,motivation & qualities for teaching such as empathy, empathy, adaptability & resilience (TI) The Courier Mail adaptability, resilience, Fishburn (2020) passion to make a difference and service orientation TPA and LANTITE Article 7 “Education standards defended” Orientations to standards (RI), & non-academic capabilities (PI) 17 January 2020 Entry standards include academic & non-academic capabilities The Courier Mail LANTITE & TPA O’Flaherty (2020) Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media… 1 3 Table 3 (continued) Article, Date, Source & Author Headline & summary Orientation Article 8 “Raise the bar for better teachers” Orientations to standards (RI), workforce needs dominating stand- 18 January 2020 Pick ‘brightest minds’ ards (MI), & need for creativity, communication & empathy (TI) The Courier Mail Entry standards Lang (2020) Entry requirements are to address teacher shortage Teachers need “soft skills such as creativity, communication & empathy” Article 9 “Teaching Passion Columnist” Orientations to standards (RI), & teachers as having passion & 20 January 2020 Entry into ITE -suitability for teaching, “passion & ability to com- being able to communicate (TI) The Courier Mail municate” MacLean (2020) “we should attract the best & brightest” Article 10 “FedUni professor secures prestigious scholarship” No discernible orientation to a particular identity for preservice & 24 January 2020 Scholarship to research TPAs TPAs- relatively new in Australia graduate teachers The Courier Hopkins (2020) Standards as the means to improve graduate teacher quality (RI) Article 11* “Teacher trainee class hours slashed to avoid shortfall” 27 April 2020 No easing of academic standards ATAR for entry The Age Carey (2020) LANTITE Article 12* “Calls for national plan to attract top students” Orientations to standards (RI), knowing about workforce needs (MI) 29 May 2020 recruitment strategy to ensure high standards & the problems inherent in the profession (TI) SMH “departments need to know more about their existing workforces, Baker (2020) shortages …problems’ a teacher’s own school results "It’s not the only quality, but it’s an essential quality.” *Schools in some Australian states moved to online learning from the last week of March 2020 due to COVID restrictions D. Pendergast et al. viewpoint about what counts as a quality ITE program. In the remaining six articles, RIs were combined with one or more of the other orientations. Five articles (2/3, 6, 8, 9 & 12) reflected orientations to TIs. Articles 6 and 7 reflected orientations to PIs, and Articles 8 and 12 reflected orientations to MIs. Only three Articles, 6 (other stakeholder), 8 (journalist) and 12 (journalist), drew attention to three of the identity options, indicating a more sophisticated understanding of important components of quality ITE program. There was no discernible pattern separating pre-COVID and COVID eras. Analysis data set #2: social media Given the dearth of public commentary on the implementation of the TPA in Aus- tralia in the legacy media, we were interested to see how this compared with social media posts. The 46 social media posts that data set #2 comprised were comments by preservice teachers in their final year of ITE regarding their final professional experience placement, the TPA or both. For a few, the only reference to the TPA was the inclusion of hashtags such as #gtpa. A number of posts supplemented a relevant hashtag with images that tied their comments to the TPA. Several posts included comments evaluating the TPA, for example as a hurdle or goal post, ‘the hardest thing I’ve ever done’, ‘the big bad TPA’, and ‘my baby’. Comments referred to the affective consequences of anticipating, executing and completing the TPA, for example, one post referred to ‘many rants and tears’. The emotions communicated in the posts ranged from apprehension to excitement, from despair to relief, pride and celebration. The posts were collegial in nature, offering encouragement and emotional support, and providing and requesting advice, ideas and resources. Some offered insights into their understanding of the content and possible expectations of the TPA. All the posts indicated a belief that efforts to complete the TPA both con- tributed to and demonstrated the development of teaching capabilities. The PSTs perception of their development and demonstration of teaching qual- ity is attested to in many of the posts, through the words but also by the inclusion of selfies that show the preservice and graduate teachers brimming with pride and jubilation. One selfie captured a mock celebration, a picture frame of the GTPA logo beside the score 5/5 held aloft like a trophy. Another selfie captured a celebratory portrait with an affirming comment about the GTPA displayed in a handheld light box. Both selfies required careful execution, and thus reflect the significance of this major capstone task that orientated to PIs. We also noted that the reach of these 46 posts seems to be limited to no more than a few dozen followers who appeared to be close contacts of the preservice or graduate teachers. Similar to data set #1 analysis, there was no discernible pattern separating pre-COVID and COVID eras. Discussions and conclusions Returning to the overarching research question –What are the discourses driv- ing the public commentary of AITSL’s Teaching Performance Assessment task in Australia and what are the inherent implications?—we note three key findings. 1 3 Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media… The first finding is that the legacy media makes no clear distinction between the TPA with other ITE initiatives such as LANTITE. It could be that LANTITE, as a quantifiable and standardised assessment, is easier to understand and report. The second finding is that the TPA information shared by social media is from pre- service teachers only, has a limited reach, and has no contributions from the ITE providers themselves. The third finding is that the social media commentaries about the TPA demonstrate that the preservice and graduate teachers recognise the weight of this major capstone assessment task. Findings one and two are new insights, and finding three aligns with research in Australia and elsewhere. Krie- waldt et  al. (2021) completed a thematic data analysis of survey responses from Australian preservice teachers who reported that through completing the AfGT, they gained an awareness of important teaching capabilities that fostered pro- fessional growth. Chandler-Olcott and Fleming (2017) investigated stakeholder perspectives during the implementation of the edTPA in New York State. Their preservice participants indicated that it was a stressful process, with an impor- tant ‘gatekeeping’ role to the profession, which provided an impetus for them to develop several teaching capabilities. Our data suggest, however, that for the period under scrutiny, those providing legacy media commentary on the broader commission of quality ITE had not yet become aware of the role of the TPA in quality assuring the outcomes of ITE. In earlier research work, the authors (Exley et  al., 2022) found that the legacy media promoted the TPA as akin to a test. The research in hand demonstrates that legacy media comments about ITE orientated to RIs, with some attention to TIs and less attention to MIs and PIs. To date, the labour of public commentary about the TPA has been left to the preservice and graduate teachers who use social media platforms with a small audience reach, and with no discernible input from the ITE provid- ers themselves. Given that teacher quality is often portrayed negatively in the media (see Pendergast et al., 2019), and social media platforms can erupt into fractured and unpleasant spaces, we are not entirely surprised to see the preservice and graduate teachers’ hesitation to proliferate in this space. We also think the dearth of social media commentary from ITE providers presents as an untapped opportunity. Back in 2017, Rowe proffered that close regulation of ITE programmes would direct the focus to the means of surveillance, measurements and accountability itself, rather than the ‘end-goals of accountability’ (p. 12), that is on the quality of the pre- service and graduate teacher. Instead, we would be interested to see if an approach to accountability that features capacity-building with a particular regard for the out- comes of TPAs had the potential to shift the discourses on graduate teacher quality. Our data are limited to a particular timeframe and also limited to available data. Our data, however, suggest that at the time of data collection, in the Australian pub- lic sphere little was known and discussed about TPAs. One reason for this is the time it takes for formal programme accreditation and reaccreditation processes. The find- ings from participation in TPA benchmarking activities do not need to be published until AITSL accreditation stage two (AITSL, 2018, p. 7), which typically takes place approximately five years after a programme has achieved accreditation stage one. Most programmes around the nation were not yet at this stage during the timespan under investigation. As more ITE programmes head towards accreditation stage two, 1 3 D. Pendergast et al. we are looking forward to the opportunities for highlighting the evidence of ITE programme impact and the TPA’s contribution as a capacity-building requirement. Our analysis of the legacy and social media outputs identifies the potential for a range of stakeholders to contribute more visibly to the public discussion on the quality of outcomes and the impact of ITE programmes in Australia. We have yet to see what might be possible when ITE providers use social media platforms to more clearly demonstrate that graduate teachers are meeting the needs and expectations of employers, orientating to the rapidly changing social world, and enacting complex theories of personal, social and cognitive development. Author contributions DP was lead author for this publication and lead in the design of the study, and formation of the argument, review of the Australian context, and data analysis and discussion. BE, as sec- ond author contributed to the design of the study and formation of the argument. She contributed major component of the theoretical lens for data analysis and discussion. FH, as third author, collected the data and applied the theoretical lens to initial data analysis. She made contributions to the formation of the argument and discussion. Funding Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. This research project was funded by a Griffith University Arts, Education and Law Group Learning and Teach- ing Grant, awarded to Pendergast and Exley. Data availability Data comprise the legacy media and social media posts. Publication details for the leg- acy media are included in the references. Details of the social media posts are available by contacting the authors. Declarations Competing interest There is no conflict of interest for any of the authors associated with this submission to The Australian Educational Researcher. Ethical approval Not applicable- our data set comprised publicly available documents like newspaper arti- cles. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Com- mons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/. References Allard, A. C., Mayer, D., & Moss, J. (2014). Authentically assessing graduate teaching: Outside and beyond neo-liberal constructs. The Australian Educational Researcher, 41, 425–443. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s13384- 013- 0140-x 1 3 Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media… Australian Catholic University (ACU). (2018). Factsheet 2: Information for pre-service teachers about the Graduate Teacher Performance Assessment. Australian Catholic University. Retrieved from https:// hmns. uq. edu. au/ files/ 4344/ GTPA% 20Fac tsheet% 20for% 20Pre- Servi ce% 20Tea chers. pdf Australian Government. (2021). Next steps: Report of the quality initial teacher education review. Retrieved from https:// www. dese. gov. au/ quali ty- initi al- teach er- educa tion- review/ resou rces/ next- steps- report- quali ty- initi al- teach er- educa tion- review Australian Government, Department of Health. (2020). Coronavirus (COVD-19) at a glance—31 May 2020. Retrieved from https:// www. health. gov. au/ resou rces/ publi catio ns/ coron avirus- covid- 19- at-a- glance- 31- may- 2020#: ~: text= Descr iption% 3A,new% 20cas es% 20rep orted% 20each% 20day. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2018). Accreditation of Initial Teacher Education programs in Australia: Standards and procedures. Retrieved from https:// www. aitsl. edu. au/ docs/ defau lt- source/ natio nal- policy- frame work/ accre ditat ion- of- initi al- teach er- educa tion- progr ams- in- austr alia. pdf? sfvrsn= e87c ff3c_ 22 Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2020). The Teacher Education Minis- terial Advisory Group. Retrieved from https:// www. educa tion. gov. au/ teach er- educa tion- minis terial- advis ory- group. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2022). Teaching performance assess- ment. https:// www. aitsl. edu. au/ deliv er- ite- progr ams/ teach ing- perfo rmance- asses sment Baker, J. (2020, May 29). Calls for national plan to attract top students. The Sydney Morning Herald, 17. Baroutsis, A., & Lingard, B. (2019). Headlines and hashtags herald new ‘damaging effects’: Media and Australia’s declining PISA performance. In A. Baroutsis, S. Riddle, & P. Thompson (Eds.), Educa- tion research and the media: Challenges and possibilities (pp. 27–46). Routledge. Baroutsis, A., & Woods, A. (2020). Academic research and public debates: A media analysis of the pro- posed Australian phonics check. In A. Woods & B. Exley (Eds.), Literacies in early childhood: Foundations for equity and quality (pp. 288–299). Oxford University Press. Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the lit- erature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (Revised). Rowman & Littlefield. Campbell, C., Cuauhtemoc Ayala, C., Railsback, R., Freking, F. W., McKenna, C., & Lausch, D. (2016). Beginning teachers’ perceptions of the California Teaching Performance Assessment (PTA). Teacher Education Quarterly, 43(2), 51–71. Canter, L. (2018). It’s not all cat videos: Moving beyond legacy media and tackling the challenges of mapping news values on digital native websites. Digital Journalism, 6(8), 1101. Carey, A. (2020, April 27). Teacher trainee class hours slashed to avoid shortfall. The Age, 4. Carey, A., & Hunter, F. (2019, December 3). Alarm bells: Students falling behind in maths, science and reading. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from https:// www. smh. com. au/ polit ics/ feder al/ alarm- bells- austr alian- stude nts- falli ng- behind- in- maths- scien ce- and- readi ng- 20191 203- p53gho. html Chandler-Olcott, K., & Fleming, S. (2017). Multiple perspectives on the state-mandated implementa- tion of a high-stakes performance assessment for preservice English teacher candidates. Action in Teacher Education, 39(1), 22–38. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 01626 620. 2016. 12527 03 Cochrane-Smith, M. (2016). Foreword. In The Teacher Education Group (Ed.), Teacher education in times of change (pp. x–xvi). Policy Press. Cochran-Smith, M., Baker, M., Burton, S., Chang, W.-C., Carney, M. C., Fernández, M. B., Keefe, E. S., Miller, A. F., & Sánchez, J. G. (2017). The accountability era in US teacher education: Looking back, looking forward. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(5), 572–588. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 02619 768. 2017. 13850 61 Commonwealth of Australia. (2019). House of Representatives Standing Committee on Employment, Education and Training Status of the Teaching Profession. Retrieved from https:// www. aph. gov. au/ Parli ament ary_ Busin ess/ Commi ttees/ House/ Emplo yment_ Educa tion_ and_ Train ing/ Teach ingPr ofess ionNew/ Report. Exley, B., & Chan, M. Y. (2014). Tensions between policy and practice: Reconciliation agendas in the Australian Curriculum English. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 13(1), 55–75. Exley, B., & Kitson, L. (2018, October, 22–24). Teaching the teachers to teach phonics: Voices from teacher education. Professional Educator. Exley, B., Pendergast, D., & Hoyte, F. (2022). Social discourses on the teacher performance assess- ment: Media tales, twitter tweets and leadership surveys. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (online), 41(1), 1–13. 1 3 D. Pendergast et al. Fishburn, D. (2019a, October 25). Being a teacher takes more than you might think. The Courier-Mail, Fishburn, D. (2019b, October 25). Valuing the work of teachers. The Cairns Post, 16. Fishburn, D. (2020, January 17). Rest assured, Queensland’s teachers are the best. The Courier-Mail, 30. Goodwin, A. L. (2020). Globalization, global mindsets and teacher education. Action in Teacher Educa- tion, 42(1), 6–18. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 01626 620. 2019. 17008 48 Hopkins, B. (2020, January 24). FedUni professor secures prestigious scholarship. The Courier (Bal- larat), 2. Hoyte, F., Singh, P., Heimans, S., & Exley, B. (2020). Discourses of quality in Australian teacher educa- tion: Critical policy analysis of a government inquiry into the status of the profession. In J. Fox, C. Alexander, & T. Aspland (Eds.), Teacher education in globalised times (pp. 159–177). Springer. Joseph, B. (2019, December 4). Slipping standards to blame for poor result. The Courier-Mail, 20. Keogh, J., & Garrick, B. (2011). Creating catch 22: Zooming in and zooming out of the discursive con- structions of teachers in a news article. Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(4), 419–434. Kriewaldt, J., Walker, R., Morey, V., & Morrison, C. (2021). Activating and reinforcing graduates’ capa- bilities: Early lessons learned from a teaching performance assessment. The Australian Educational Researcher, 48, 681–696. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s13384- 020- 00418-4 Lang, K. (2020, January 18). Raise the bar for better teachers. The Courier-Mail, 51. Loughland, T., & Bostwick, K. (2022). A taxonomy of clinical reasoning for pre-service teachers on professional experience. The Australian Educational Researcher. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s13384- 022- 00568-7 Maclean, D. (2020, January 20). Letter to the editor. The Courier-Mail, 24. Mitchell, S. (2019, December 7). Recognise that marks matter to stop 20-year education slide. Sydney Morning Herald, 33. O’Flaherty, A, (2020, January 17). Education standards defended. The Courier-Mail, 16. O’Meara, J., & MacDonald, D. (2004). Power, prestige and pedagogic identity: A tale of two programs recontextualising teacher standards. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), 111–127. Olsen, B. (2008). Teaching what they learn, learning what they live. Paradigm Publishers. Pausigere, P., & Graven, M. (2013). Unveiling the South African official primary mathematics teacher pedagogic identity. Perspectives in Education, 31(3), 19–33. Pendergast, D., Exley, B., Bahr, N., & Ferreira, J. (2019). Social media and teacher professionalism: Get- ting in on the act. In A. Gutierrez, J. Fox, & C. Alexander (Eds.), Professionalism and teacher edu- cation: Voices from policy and practice (pp. 27–46). Springer. Pendergast, D., Exley, B., O’Brien, M., Du Plessis, A., Main, K., & Anderson, T. (2020). learning@home WIL Initiative Evaluation. Retrieved from https:// resea rch- repos itory. gri ffith. edu. au/ bitst ream/ han- dle/ 10072/ 405802/ Pende rgast 500426- Publi shed. pdf? seque nce=3. Reid, J. (2019). What’s good enough? Teacher education and the practice challenge. The Australian Edu- cational Researcher, 46, 715–734. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s13384- 019- 00348-w Rowan, L., Mayer, D., Kline, J. et al. (2015). Investigating the effectiveness of teacher education for early career teachers in diverse settings: The longitudinal research we have to have. The Australian Edu- cational Researcher, 42, 273–298. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s13384- 014- 0163-y Rowe, E. (2017). UNESCO Country case prepared for the 2017/8 global education monitoring report: Accountability in education: Meeting our commitment. Australia country case study. UNESCO. Retrieved from https:// unesd oc. unesco. org/ ark:/ 48223/ pf000 02595 41 Scholes, L., Lampert, J., Burnett, B., Comber, B., Hoff, L., & Ferguson, A. (2017). The politics of quality teacher discourses: Implications for pre-service teachers in high poverty schools. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 19–43. Simpson Reeves, S., Exley, B., & Dillon-Wallace, J. (2018). Secondary school English teachers caught in the NAPLAN Fray: Effects of the disparate responses. English in Australia, 53(1), 24–32. Singhal, P. (2019, April 21). ‘Profession in crisis’: Warning about teacher shortage risk. Sydney Morning Herald. https:// www. smh. com. au/ educa tion/ profe ssion- in- crisis- teach er- short age- predi cted- in- next- four- years- 20190 417- p51f2q. html Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group (TEMAG). (2014). Action Now: Classroom ready teach- ers. Retrieved from https:// docs. educa tion. gov. au/ docum ents/ action- now- class room- ready- teach ers- report. Teachers could learn from report. (2019, October 1). Sydney Morning Herald, 20. The University of Melbourne. (n.d.). AfGT assessment task summary. Retrieved from https:// educa tion. unime lb. edu. au/__ data/ assets/ pdf_ file/ 0009/ 28783 62/ AfGT- Visua lSequ ence- v1.0- 21021 81. pdf. 1 3 Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media… Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., Underwood, C., & Schmid, M. (2019). PISA 2018 in Brief I: Student perfor- mance. Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). Retrieved from https:// resea rch. acer. edu. au/ ozpisa/ 34 Tudge, A. (2021). Initial teacher education review launched. Retrieved from https:// minis ters. dese. gov. au/ tudge/ initi al- teaac her- educa tion- review- launc hed UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2020). Teachers. Retrieved from http:// uis. unesco. org/ en/ topic/ teach ers White, S., Murray, J., Goodwin, A. L., Kosnik, C., & Beck, C. (2020). On the shoulders of giants: Advice for beginning teacher educators. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 49(5), 566–579. Wilkie, K. (2020, March 2). Australia’s most epic parent-teacher row EVER. Daily Mail Australia. Retrieved from https:// www. daily mail. co. uk/ news/ artic le- 80632 05/ Extra ordin ary- social- media- row- spark ed- late- night- ambush- princ ipals- home. html Willis, L., & Exley, B. (2018). Using an online social media space to engage parents in student learning in the early years: Enablers and impediments. Digital Education Review, 33, 87–104. Zeichner, K. (2020). Preparing teachers as democratic professionals. Action in Teacher Education, 42(1), 38–48. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 01626 620. 2019. 17008 47 Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Donna Pendergast is Director, Engagement in the Arts, Education and Law Group and former Dean and Head of the School of Education and Professional Studies at Griffith University, Australia (2009–2023). She commenced her career as a secondary school classroom teacher. Her expertise includes student engagement and teacher professional learning. Donna led the team preparing Queensland government schools for the introduction of Junior Secondary phase and the shift of Year 7 into secondary in 2015. She undertook similar work in South Australia across sectors for the shift in 2022. Donna works at state and national levels in shaping education policy including as: a member of the Board of the Australian Institute of Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL)  (2018); Chair of the Teacher Education Expert Standing Committee (TEESC) of AITSL (2019); Chair of the Queensland Educational Leadership Insti- tute (QELi) (2018–2022); Chair of the Queensland Council of Deans of Education (QCDE)(2016–2022) and Vice President of the Australian Council of Deans of Education (ACDE (2021–2022). Donna is also a member of the National Council for Be You (2021). Donna has been acknowledged for her leadership impact and is the recipient of the Vice Chancellor’s Research Supervision Award for Excellence (2016) and in 2018 was awarded the Australian Council for Educational Leadership Miller-Grassie Award for Outstanding Leadership in Education. In 2022 Donna received the Australian Council of Deans of Educa- tion Award for Outstanding Service to Education and the Council. Beryl Exley is a teaching and research Professor with the School of Education and Professional Studies at Griffith University. She has been Deputy Head of School (2018–2022) with special responsibility for the Australian Institute of Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) and Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA) accreditation for the initial teacher education programs. Beryl com- menced her teacher education journey with an undergraduate and master level qualifications in education and worked in early childhood and primary school settings for a decade. She completed her PhD at the Queensland University of Technology in 2005 and has been working in teacher education since that time. Her research interests are in English Curriculum, enactment of teacher knowledge and pedagogic rights for a range of stakeholders. She is a past National President of the Australian Literacy Educators’ Asso- ciation (ALEA) and is a proud ALEA life member. Frances Hoyte contributes to teaching and research at the  School of Education and Professional Stud- ies at Griffith University and currently also works in a state school as an Inclusion teacher. Her career in education has spanned several decades, including classroom teaching, and school and regional leadership positions in both suburban and rural areas. She has been involved in continuing teacher education through advisory and leadership roles in state schools. More recently she has contributed to teacher education as la  ecturer and tutor in initial teacher education programs. Her research interests include children’s lan- guage and literacy development, and policy and practice issues in teacher education. 1 3 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Australian Educational Researcher Springer Journals

Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media comment on the teaching performance assessment

Download PDF
19 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/public-commentary-on-teacher-quality-an-analysis-of-media-comment-on-WodCaYjqhS

References (83)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © Crown 2023
ISSN
0311-6999
eISSN
2210-5328
DOI
10.1007/s13384-023-00635-7
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In Australia, the Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA) is a relatively new, man- datory hurdle which must be completed just prior to the graduation stage of ini- tial teacher education (ITE) programmes. This high-stakes task is one of a grow- ing number of requirements to come out of the standards and accountability regime as outlined in the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) document for accreditation for ITE programmes. We delve into the public commen- tary about the broader commission of preservice and graduate teacher quality in general and the TPA in particular. We draw on Bernstein’s pedagogic identities and deductively apply this theory to explore this phenomenon. We use a data set of pub- licly available legacy media and social media tweets made over a ten-month period from August 2019 to May 2020 to reveal the focus, inherent bias and pedagogic identities promoted by these public discourses. The paper concludes with discussion about the implications of these drivers on the public perception of quality in ITE and on the status of teaching more broadly. Keywords Teaching performance assessment · Initial teacher education · Accreditation · Legacy media · Social media · Teacher quality * Donna Pendergast d.pendergast@griffith.edu.au Beryl Exley b.exley@griffith.edu.au Frances Hoyte f.hoyte@griffith.edu.au School of Education and Professional Studies, Griffith University, Mount Gravatt, QLD, Australia Vol.:(0123456789) 1 3 D. Pendergast et al. Initial teacher education in context According to UNESCO, the last few years has evidenced the continual global ‘preoccupation’ with teacher education, recruitment, retention, professional sta- tus and working conditions for teachers (UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2020). There is also an estimated shortfall of 69 million teachers to achieve the universal goal of primary and secondary education by 2030 (UNESCO Institute for Statis- tics, 2020). Throughout the world, teacher education institutes, the school sys- tems who employ graduate teachers, and the regulatory authorities who accredit teacher education programmes are all drawing on a range of policy, accountabil- ity, practice, research and equity ‘turns’ (Cochrane-Smith, 2016; Goodwin, 2020; Zeichner, 2020) to remodel teacher education. The re-imagining of teacher educa- tion in Australia is one response to teacher shortages, the effects of which are dra- matic, with workforce shortfalls in all school systems in all states and territories of Australia (see Singhal, 2019, April 21). A convergence of factors contributes to teacher shortages, including increased population, a decline in applicants to ITE, and public commentary about the low status of and declining morale within the profession (Commonwealth of Australia, 2019; Exley et  al., 2022). Despite the fact that many issues contribute to teacher shortages, initial teacher education has taken the brunt of the blame in policy and public commentary (Rowan et al., 2015; White et al., 2020). Concurrently, the teaching profession in Australia is also faced with allega- tions of reduced teacher quality in response to student achievement data. Crit- ics cite plummeting performance in international comparative scales, such as the Programme for International Student Performance (PISA). Australia’s achieve- ment trends in PISA reveal a net downward spiral in all domains over more than two decades (Thomson et al., 2019). The broader commission of teacher quality is thus constantly commented upon. For instance, Carey and Hunter reported in the Sydney Morning Herald that ‘Australian students have recorded their worst ever results in an international test of reading, maths and science skills, and are now about a full school year behind where Australian students were at the turn of the millennium’ (2019, December 3, para. 1). Declining student achievement has spearheaded school- level initiatives such as implementing uniform centralised testing regimes across the country’s diverse schooling systems. Declining student achievement has resulted in more calls for accountability and standardisation ini- tiatives to improve teacher quality and ensure ‘classroom ready graduates’. Such initiatives have specifically targeted ITE. A series of government- initiated inquiries into the profession has resulted in the establishment of policy making government entities designed to shape teacher education and build accountabilities aligned with the teacher quality agenda (Allard et  al., 2014; Rowan et  al., 2015). The establishment of the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) in 2010 serves as a par- ticular marker, commencing the journey to establish (i) professional standards for teachers; and (ii) standards for ITE programmes. These standards are federally mandated requirements for programme accreditation, with ITE graduates eligible 1 3 Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media… for teacher registration and subsequently employment as a teacher. Since AITSL was established, national level inquiries have continued to focus on quality in ITE and the teaching profession more generally. The highly influential Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group’s Action Now: Classroom Ready Teach- ers (TEMAG, 2014) review made 38 key recommendations designed to renovate ITE, respond to concerns about the diminishing status of the profession, and address the attrition of novice teachers (many within 5  years of graduation). In this review, the cause of this attrition is largely framed as inadequate preparation in their ITE programme. As a result of the advice to TEMAG (AITSL, 2020, Para.1), and with extensive consultation, the Programme Standards document Accreditation of Initial Teacher Education Programmes in Australia: Standards and Procedures (AITSL, 2018), was developed in 2011 and revised in 2018, with accreditation overseen by the state-based authority. These standards comprise a suite of mandatory requirements including academic and non-academic selection criteria for programme entry (Pro- gramme Standard 3.2), the Literacy and Numeracy Test for Initial Teacher Educa- tion (Programme Standard 3.5), English language proficiency requirements (Pro- gramme Standard 3.6), and a minimum number of days of professional experience (Programme Standard 5.2). Another mandatory requirement is an exit hurdle task that demonstrates readiness for teaching—the Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA). The establishment of a TPA requirement in Australia follows international trends to replace written licensure tests to document the readiness of graduate teach- ers to enter the classroom. For example, a version of the TPA was first piloted in California in 2004, and then mandated for newly enrolled preservice teachers from 2008 (Campbell et  al., 2016). Since this time, the Californian TPA has been rede- signed and renamed as the Fresno Assessment of Student Teachers (FAST), and the Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT). Common across all ver- sions is a focus on the assessment of the graduate teacher’s planning, instruction and assessment of their own practices and students’ learning (Campbell et al., 2016). Our focus in this article is on the public commentary around one specific initia- tive in ITE, the introduction of a TPA in Australia. In the next section, we introduce the background information about the TPA initiative. We then locate and analyse the mentions of this initiative in publicly available legacy media and social media tweets over a 10-month period. We draw on Bernstein’s (2000) pedagogic identities and deductively explore this phenomenon. Our analysis demonstrates the misunder- standing that exists, and we examine why some stakeholders lack a voice on this matter. We close by commenting on the possible repercussions of the public’s per- ception of the TPA on ITE and graduate teacher quality. Teaching Performance Assessments in Australia After considerable work to design and implement TPAs in Australia (see e.g., Allard et  al., 2014; Kriewaldt et  al., 2021), these assessments are now a key component of the mandatory hurdles all ITE students complete to graduate, achieve registration and be eligible for employment. Developed in response 1 3 D. Pendergast et al. to Recommendation 28 of the TEMAG Report, ITE providers and schools are required to ‘assist pre-service teachers to develop and collect sophisticated evi- dence of their teaching ability and their impact on student learning’ (TEMAG, 2014, p. 33). The inclusion of a TPA in ITE programmes enables providers to meet Programme  Standard 1.2 which specifies that ‘Program and assessment design ensures pre-service teachers successfully complete a final-year teaching performance assessment prior to graduation’ (AITSL, 2018, p. 12). On their web- site, AITSL (2022) explains that a TPA is: a tool used to assess the practical skills and knowledge of pre-service teach- ers. Pre-service teachers collect evidence of practice to complete a TPA in the final year of their initial teacher education programme. It is assessed by ITE providers and is a requirement of graduation. (AITSL, 2022, “What is a teaching performance assessment?” section) Since their inception, TPAs have continued to come under scrutiny as part of pol- icy reviews of ITE. Attracting and selecting high quality candidates and preparing ITE students to be effective teachers was the focus of the Quality Initial Teacher Education (QITE) review (Tudge, 2021). The resulting report, Next steps: Report of the Quality Initial Teacher Education Review (Australian Government, 2021) emphasised the value of the TPAs, stating they were: regarded as the most significant outcome of the TEMAG Review reforms, with the most potential to improve the quality of ITE programmes and pro- duce graduate teachers with the skills, knowledge and practices to be suc- cessful when they enter the classroom. (Australian Government, 2021, p. 44) By the end of 2021 all TPAs utilised in Australian ITE achieved endorsement. An estimated 25,000 preservice teachers attempt one of the 12 approved TPAs each year. The two most widely used are the Graduate Teacher Performance Assess- ment (GTPA) led by the Australian Catholic University, and the Assessment for Graduate Teaching (AfGT) led by Melbourne University. The GTPA requires ITE students to teach a significant learning sequence with clear learning goals and differentiation for individual learners and small groups. ITE students must dem- onstrate planning, teaching, assessing, reflecting and appraising practices (Aus- tralian Catholic University [ACU], 2018). A validated, quality assured assess- ment process combines internal and external moderation with common standards across all 18 participating providers. Likewise, the AfGT brings together 14 insti- tutions and requires demonstration of planning for learning and teaching; analys- ing teaching practice; assessing for impact on student learning; and expanding practice. Together, these two TPAs account for the majority of higher education institutions (32 of 47), with the remaining TPAs a combination of small consortia and TPAs produced by individual higher education providers. As well as emphasising the importance of TPAs, the Next Steps report (Aus- tralian Government, 2021) identified challenges with the early implementation, concluding that various stakeholders claimed that a lack of consistency in quality 1 3 Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media… was ‘limiting the potential impact of TPAs’ (Australian Government, 2021, p. 44). The report recommended a ‘strengthening’ of TPAs through ‘national setting and moderation and comparability’ (p. 54). The goal of ‘classroom readiness’ was to be achieved through more accountability and tighter control of the range of TPAs, with decision-making power given to a new, external ‘governance board’, limi- tations on provider attempts to have their TPA endorsed, and more government funding to support the two major TPAs (Australian Government, 2021, p. 54). The introduction of TPAs is a complex move in the ITE space. On one hand, TPAs can facilitate comparability and accountability imposed on ITE by external forces, supporting what Rowe (2017) describes as the ‘market responsive’ approach, as opposed to the ‘capacity building’ approach favoured in Finland (p. 7). On the other hand, TPAs offer the potential for higher education providers to have input into the design and content of this capstone task. Allard et  al. (2014) suggest that ITE providers have had a major role in creating and implementing the task and that this has given them some agency in preparing and assessing graduates (see also Lough- land & Bostwick, 2022). Additionally, the major TPA tasks in Australia provide pre- service teachers with the type of task that has potential to reflect the complexity of teaching, that is, contextualised problem solving, requiring engagement with theory, reflection, and a repertoire of teaching skills (Reid, 2019). Market‑oriented thinking The approach to both ITE and school education in Australia has been described by Rowe (2017) as ‘market-oriented’ (p. 7), that is, relying on standardisation and test- ing to measure performance. The trend towards standardisation is evident in school- ing (Simpson Reeves et al., 2018), and in teacher education via the implementation of high stakes tasks for certification and in government control of accreditation pro- cesses for teacher education programmes (Cochrane-Smith et  al., 2017; Goodwin, 2020). Scholes et  al. (2017) note that in the Australian context, a strong focus on teacher quality has thwarted a consideration of other factors that may influence student achievement such as socioeconomic backgrounds, ethnicity, refugee sta- tus and gender, and students’ geographic location. The overriding power of dis- course of teacher quality also pertains to the ITE space, with the recent focus in the TEMAG and QITE reviews on the quality of graduate teachers, and a philosophical commitment to a market-oriented stance demonstrated through the further ‘strengthening’ of elements such as the TPA. The push for standardisa- tion of content in ITE and benchmark testing to measure preservice and graduate teacher performance is the foundation of the new accreditation processes for ITE programmes across the country. As a consequence, ‘many recent reforms target classroom teacher quality and readiness’ (Rowe, 2017, p. 7). These reforms have been enacted in Australia via the accreditation requirements mandated by AITSL, specifically increasing accountability and establishing a range of standards that reinforce market-oriented thinking. Given this market-oriented model driving 1 3 D. Pendergast et al. education policy makers in Australia, we are keen to delve deeper into the pub- lic’s understanding of TPAs as arguably the strongest lever in the ITE reforms. Public commentary Our examination of the legacy media (which include, for example, online news- papers, Canter, 2018) and social media comment on the TPA sits against a back- drop of public commentary on preservice and graduate teacher quality in Aus- tralia and elsewhere. Comments about the TPA have potential to become part of the broader public conversation about the teaching profession (Exley et al., 2022). Since the digitalisation of media, and the burgeoning access to the Internet, this public commentary on ITE quality has proliferated in disparate ways. Commen- tary, written by journalists and featured in the legacy media, provides limited opportunity for readers and other stakeholders to challenge dominant discourses, which often drive negative public opinion about ITE quality in Australia (Keogh & Garrick, 2011) and internationally (see Goodwin, 2020). Baroutsis and Lingard (2019) also highlighted the propensity with which the mainstream media in Aus- tralia constructs education as being in crisis and successes as being atypical. While commentary via social media allows individual citizens and stakeholder representatives to engage in a/synchronous banter from which journalists are typically left out (Canter, 2018), other factors have been found to constrain the teaching profession’s engagement in these discussions. Pendergast et  al. (2019) analysed three publicly accessible blog posts about teacher professionalism in Australia in 2018. The general public, activist groups and publishing compa- nies joined the discussion about teacher professionalism, but many teachers and school leaders were ‘rendered voiceless by their employers’ in this space. Being active on social media was considered ‘time-consuming, intellectually and emo- tionally exhausting, and at times, risky business’ (Pendergast et al., 2019, p. 47). This latter point is reinforced by Baroutsis and Woods (2020) who reported that when an Australian teacher educator provided a professional viewpoint about a teaching matter, their @handle was bombarded with unsavoury tweets by those with an opposing viewpoint who hid behind cryptic @handles. In another case, three Australian parents who did not agree with a school’s enactment of a behav- iour management process were each found guilty in an Australian court for unfairly savaging a principal’s reputation on social media. This case made inter- national headlines as Australia’s most epic parent-teacher row EVER (Wilkie, 2020, March 2). Research by Willis and Exley (2018) found that some teachers had limited experience with social media or lacked the time and technical support to participate. For a number of reasons, teachers often lurked rather than partici- pated, meaning that within the social media mode, the voices of the profession were often mediated by a few (Exley et  al., 2022). In light of the public discus- sion of the profession, graduate teachers and ITE, we were interested to see how both these media channels respond to and represent the TPA, a recent innovation in ITE in Australia. 1 3 Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media… Theoretical framing To examine Australian public commentary on preservice and graduate teacher qual- ity generally and the TPA specifically, we drew on Bernstein’s (2000) theorisation of discourse. According to Bernstein (2000), discourses external to the higher educa- tion provider, such as discourses of the state (Hoyte et al., 2020) or discourses from major stakeholders (Exley & Kitson, 2018), prescribe and proscribe the way ITE programmes are designed, delivered and assessed. The public commentary, via both legacy and social media, is palpable and powerful in that it contributes directly and indirectly to the ebb and flow of what constitutes a quality ITE programme and a valid TPA. These understandings contribute to the shaping of the institutional iden- tity of the ITE programme. Bernstein (2000) proposes that the range of discourses may project, or give prominence to, one or more of four possible institutional identi- ties: retrospective identities, prospective identities, therapeutic identities, and market driven identities. A Retrospective Identity (RI) is projected when institutions dis-embed and de-locate criteria from the past and project them into the present programmes (Bernstein, 2000). RI discourses are dominant when, for example, an ITE pro- gramme is not modified to meet the needs of the current cohort of preservice and graduate teachers or current market imperatives. In their examination of two teacher education programmes in Australia, O’Meara and MacDonald (2004) asserted that only elite institutions with considerable reputational capital can afford to project a RI and attract academics with a strong commitment to RI who in turn perpetuate RIs. An example of RI discourses in ITE is the high stakes Literacy and Numeracy Test in Initial Teacher Education (LANTITE) which all preservice teachers must pass to graduate. A Prospective Identity (PI) is projected when institutions recontextualise crite- ria from the past alongside a neo-conservative push for social change, such as cultural, economic and technological change (Bernstein, 2000). A PI dominates in ITE programmes when the institution has the ‘desire to foreground the future career needs of teachers through the selective recontextualising of past features’ (O’Meara & MacDonald, 2004, p. 114). An example is the overt placement, within an ITE program, of Australian Professional Standard for Teachers (APST) ‘2.4 Understand and respect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to promote reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians’ (AITSL, 2018, p. 22). As Exley and Chan (2014) document, this APST usually requires new content knowledge for many preservice and graduate teachers. A Therapeutic Identity (TI) is projected when institutions give prominence to progressive pedagogies that subscribe to complex theories of personal, social and cognitive development (Bernstein, 2000). For example, if the institution builds its reputation on the formal teaching qualifications and years of experi- ence of their academic and sessional staff and advertises a focus on the personal development and actualisation of preservice and graduate teachers as individual autonomous and flexible thinking learners, then the institution would be project- ing TIs. Bernstein (2000, p. 70) explains that the power within TI discourses can 1 3 D. Pendergast et al. be disguised by ‘soft management styles and veiled hierarchies’ (2000, p. 69). TIs are expensive because time and effort are required to develop the theoretical basis; theory is not always explicit, and the outputs of the learning are difficult to standardise and thus quantify. A Market Identity (MI) is formed when institutions give priority to the local employment market requirements (Bernstein, 2000). When institutions view their work in teacher education as fulfilling a vocational role rather than a knowledge exploration role, a MI dominates. Influential market sources include systems of education and individual schools who supervise and assess preservice teachers and employ graduate teachers. When MI projections dominate, market sectors exert measures to ensure institutional compliance via funding allocations, such as mandating or banning ITE content. When MI projections are most active, ITE programmes are vulnerable to re-modelling in response to current issues, state initiatives and employment market demands (O’Meara & MacDonald, 2004). While multiple discourses circulate at any one time, one or more may gain promi- nence to drive public perceptions of preservice and graduate teachers (Rowan et al., 2015) and influence current understandings of the TPA. Bernstein (2000) and oth- ers (O’Meara & MacDonald, 2004; Pausigere & Graven, 2013) use the nomencla- ture of pedagogic identities to refer to the projection of an institutional identity and its mediation by macro, mezzo and micro level discourses. In this way, this work on pedagogic identities sits apart from other research work that explores identity in teacher development (see Beauchamp & Thomas, 2009), and in teachers’ profes- sional lives (see Olsen, 2008). The study We investigated the public discourses about the quality of Australian ITE pro- grammes and the newly introduced TPA over a 10-month period from 1 August 2019 to 31 May 2020. Our research question is: What are the discourses driving the public commentary on AITSL’s Teaching Performance Assessment task in Aus- tralia and what are the inherent implications? We investigated both legacy and social media, in recognition of the complexity of the communication landscape (Canter, 2018; Pendergast et al., 2019). Our data collection period sits between the commencement of TPAs as obliga- tory components of ITE, and before Stage 2 of Accreditation when institutions would have to start publishing the results of their TPA processes. During the first months of the study, preservice teachers were able to implement the data collec- tion, planning and teaching required to complete their TPA in face-to-face classroom contexts. With the onset of the global COVID-19 pandemic and resulting school closures (Australian Government & Department of Health, 2020), from late March 2020, preservice teachers completed an adapted TPA task, designed collaboratively by ITE providers and education systems (see Pendergast et al., 2020). The data col- lection period also includes two points in time where graduating preservice teach- ers were distributing their eportfolios and seeking employment opportunities. This 1 3 Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media… article focuses on commentary on the TPA in both its original format and also the alternative TPA. Methods Harvesting data set #1: legacy media Australian legacy media includes two national newspapers and 10 state/territory daily papers, published in print and online. Just two companies dominate ownership of the national papers, one owned by News Corp Australia (formerly News Limited) and the other by Nine Entertainment Co (formally Fairfax Media). These two com- panies also own eight of the state/territory daily newspapers. Articles for data set #1 were identified through searches on two occasions in each of two databases: the Australia New Zealand Newsstream (via the ProQuest plat- form) and the Australia and New Zealand Reference Centre (via EBSCOhost plat- form). The first set of searches covered 1 August 2019 to 31 March 2020. The sec- ond set of searches covered 1 April 2020 to 31 May 2020. Search terms included the following phrases: ‘teaching performance assessment’ and ‘teacher perfor- mance assessment’, the terms ‘TPA’, ‘teacher graduate’, ‘graduate teacher’, ‘gradu- ate teach*’, ‘preservice teachers’, and ‘teacher standards’. This variety of terms was used because the TPA is a relatively new assessment in Australia and it may have been referred to without use of its formal name. The articles located by the searches were read to identify ones about Australia that included comments relevant to the TPA. The first search in the Australia and New Zealand Newsstream (via Proquest) delivered eight relevant articles. The search in the Australia/New Zealand Refer- ence Centre (via Ebscohost) identified no additional articles. The second round of searches located one reference from the Proquest platform and one additional refer- ence from the Ebscohost platform. A total of one Letter to the Editor and 11 arti- cles comprise the legacy media data set. Five articles were from the Brisbane-based Courier Mail (News Corp), three from the Sydney Morning Herald (Nine/Fairfax Media) and one each from The Cairns Post (News Corp), the Courier (Ballarat) (News Corp), and The Age (Nine/Fairfax Media) published in Melbourne. Articles 11 and 12 were published during the time schools in some Australian states moved to online learning due to COVID restrictions. Harvesting data set #2: social media Social media posts were located using two search engines: Social Searcher and Google Twitter Search, at three points in time. The first searches covered August 2019 to March 2020 and the second covered April 2020 to June 2020. These searches used the terms ‘teacher performance assessment’, ‘graduate teacher’ and ‘teacher standards’. The Google Twitter search provided four posts and a small trail of responses. The Social Searcher tool provided two Instagram posts and a notifi- cation of a private Facebook group discussing the Graduate Teacher Performance 1 3 D. Pendergast et al. Table 1 Information on the hashtags with potential relevance for the TPA Hashtags explored TPA-related posts #afgta 3 posts #tpa Unrelated topics and TPAs in the US #graduateAQ teacher A small number only relevant to Australia #assessment for graduate teaching One post- “Miss-Happy” (pseudonym) #teacher performance assessment Two posts relevant to Australia #gtpa 46 posts relevant to Australia #teaching performance assessment 2 posts relevant to Australia Table 2 Number of #gtpa posts per month from August 2019 to June 2020 Month Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar* Apr* May* #gtpa posts 5 5 8 1 0 3 5 9 4 6 *Schools in some Australian states moved to online learning from the last week of March 2020 due to COVID restrictions Assessment (GTPA). A third search in July 2020 with the search term ‘teaching performance assessment’ located two Instagram posts from Social Searcher and six posts from the Google Twitter Search. The Instagram posts provided a rich seam of data. Both Instagram posts included a selection of hashtags which linked the post to virtual ‘noticeboards’ of other posts which were potentially on the same topic. Any given hashtag might relate to a num- ber of topics (e.g., #afgta was linked to posts about fitness and the #tpa linked to the United States versions of a teaching performance assessment). We read several of the most promising hashtag notice boards (see Table 1) to locate posts about the Australian TPA from within our timeframe. The hashtag #gtpa led to a set of 46 social media posts (see Table 2). These posts were distributed over the data collection timespan, and many were cross linked to other relevant hashtags which also revealed a small number of posts with similar content and tone. We chose to limit our discussion to the #gtpa posts because this set clear limits to the social media we discuss. In summary, the data on which we report includes 12 articles from the legacy media and the 46 social media posts under the #gtpa. Analysis of data To analyse public commentary on the TPA within the Australian ITE context we considered the dominant discourses with respect to the pedagogic identities pro- posed by Bernstein (2000). The third author conducted the first pass through data sets #1 and #2 to determine the themes that emerged, that being statements about the decline in Australia’s educational standards; the exclusive use of external testing as the measure of educational standards; the inadequacy of teachers; the reliance on 1 3 Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media… government-initiated reviews to drive reforms; the selection criteria for programme entry; and the evaluation of graduates prior to entry to the profession. In a series of face-to-face data analysis meetings, all authors read each legacy and social media article and worked deductively using the definitions and understandings of the pedagogic identity theory to note overt or implicit orientations to particular identi- ties. This allowed us to specify orientations to pedagogic identities for the topic of teacher quality. We came up with the following examples: Retrospective identities (RI) orientate to criteria from the past that are projected into the current programme (e.g., comments about applying external standards, the assumed benefits of LANTITE) Prospective identities (PI) orientate to criteria from the past aligned to social change (e.g., comments about teacher commitment or bringing about change) Therapeutic identities (TI) orientate to pedagogies subscribing to complex theo- ries of personal, social and cognitive development (e.g., comments on empathy, resilience, or creativity) Market identities (MI) orientate to the career needs of the local employment mar- ket (e.g., references to workforce demands dictating changes to teaching subject areas). Findings Analysis data set #1: legacy media The 12 legacy media articles in data set #1 had various authors: journalists (Articles 1, 7, 8, 10, 11), the Director of the Queensland College of Teachers (Articles 2/3 & 6), a State Government Minister (Article 5), a researcher (Article 4) and a private citizen who wrote a letter to the editor (Article 9). See Table 3 for information about date, publisher, headline, author, summary and identified orientations. Article 10 could not be assessed for any particular orientation and Articles 2 and 3 are the same article published in two papers. This leaves 10 articles for discussion. Important to our work in this paper, only two articles (2/3 & 6) drew attention to the TPA, both written by the Director of the Queensland College of Teachers (the regulating authority that is responsible for registration for teachers in the state of Queensland). The TPA is neither mentioned by a journalist nor other stakeholders. We pick up on this point in the analysis of data set #2. Our next observation concerns the orientations towards ITE that predominate in this suite of articles. All 10 articles had some orientation to RIs, reflecting the dominant view that quality ITE can only exist as a result of tight and conservative regulation. Nine of the 10 articles made direct reference to entry standards, some calling on entry standards to be raised and others appreciating that these bench- marks are not the sole determiner of quality teachers. Five of the articles mentioned LANTITE scores as being an important contributor to the discussion on preservice and graduate teacher quality. Four of the articles, two by journalists and two by other stakeholders, orientated only to RIs. Such an orientation provides a very narrow 1 3 D. Pendergast et al. 1 3 Table 3 Analysis of legacy media artefacts Article, Date, Source & Author Headline & summary Orientation Article 1 “Teachers could learn from report” Standards as the means to improve graduate teacher quality (RI) 1 October 2019 Release of report from NSW Auditor General: Impose standards to Sydney Morning Herald (2019) raise teacher quality Orientations to standards (RI), teachers as empathetic, adaptable & Article 2/3 “Being a teacher takes more than you might think.” 25 October 2019 “Valuing the work of teachers” resilient (TI) The Courier Mail High standards to enter the profession, including “extensive The Cairns Post professional experience, a rigorous degree, & a challenging final Fishburn (2019a, b) teaching performance assessment” Teachers need- extensive skills, deep content knowledge, creativ- ity, intelligence, empathy, adaptability & resilience” (p. 16) Article 4 “Slipping standards to blame for poor result” Standards as the means to improve graduate teacher quality (RI) 4 December 2019 “mediocre standards” for ITE The Courier Mail LANTITE Joseph (2019) benchmarks for ITE entry ensure rigorous ITE content Article 5 “Recognise that marks matter to stop 20-year education slide” Standards as the means to improve graduate teacher quality (RI) 7 December 2019 PISA results Sydney Morning Herald ATAR entry scores Mitchell (2019) “poor university marks” Article 6 “Rest assured, Queensland’s teachers are the best” Orientations to standards (RI), passion to make a difference (PI), & 17 January 2020 Entry scores,motivation & qualities for teaching such as empathy, empathy, adaptability & resilience (TI) The Courier Mail adaptability, resilience, Fishburn (2020) passion to make a difference and service orientation TPA and LANTITE Article 7 “Education standards defended” Orientations to standards (RI), & non-academic capabilities (PI) 17 January 2020 Entry standards include academic & non-academic capabilities The Courier Mail LANTITE & TPA O’Flaherty (2020) Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media… 1 3 Table 3 (continued) Article, Date, Source & Author Headline & summary Orientation Article 8 “Raise the bar for better teachers” Orientations to standards (RI), workforce needs dominating stand- 18 January 2020 Pick ‘brightest minds’ ards (MI), & need for creativity, communication & empathy (TI) The Courier Mail Entry standards Lang (2020) Entry requirements are to address teacher shortage Teachers need “soft skills such as creativity, communication & empathy” Article 9 “Teaching Passion Columnist” Orientations to standards (RI), & teachers as having passion & 20 January 2020 Entry into ITE -suitability for teaching, “passion & ability to com- being able to communicate (TI) The Courier Mail municate” MacLean (2020) “we should attract the best & brightest” Article 10 “FedUni professor secures prestigious scholarship” No discernible orientation to a particular identity for preservice & 24 January 2020 Scholarship to research TPAs TPAs- relatively new in Australia graduate teachers The Courier Hopkins (2020) Standards as the means to improve graduate teacher quality (RI) Article 11* “Teacher trainee class hours slashed to avoid shortfall” 27 April 2020 No easing of academic standards ATAR for entry The Age Carey (2020) LANTITE Article 12* “Calls for national plan to attract top students” Orientations to standards (RI), knowing about workforce needs (MI) 29 May 2020 recruitment strategy to ensure high standards & the problems inherent in the profession (TI) SMH “departments need to know more about their existing workforces, Baker (2020) shortages …problems’ a teacher’s own school results "It’s not the only quality, but it’s an essential quality.” *Schools in some Australian states moved to online learning from the last week of March 2020 due to COVID restrictions D. Pendergast et al. viewpoint about what counts as a quality ITE program. In the remaining six articles, RIs were combined with one or more of the other orientations. Five articles (2/3, 6, 8, 9 & 12) reflected orientations to TIs. Articles 6 and 7 reflected orientations to PIs, and Articles 8 and 12 reflected orientations to MIs. Only three Articles, 6 (other stakeholder), 8 (journalist) and 12 (journalist), drew attention to three of the identity options, indicating a more sophisticated understanding of important components of quality ITE program. There was no discernible pattern separating pre-COVID and COVID eras. Analysis data set #2: social media Given the dearth of public commentary on the implementation of the TPA in Aus- tralia in the legacy media, we were interested to see how this compared with social media posts. The 46 social media posts that data set #2 comprised were comments by preservice teachers in their final year of ITE regarding their final professional experience placement, the TPA or both. For a few, the only reference to the TPA was the inclusion of hashtags such as #gtpa. A number of posts supplemented a relevant hashtag with images that tied their comments to the TPA. Several posts included comments evaluating the TPA, for example as a hurdle or goal post, ‘the hardest thing I’ve ever done’, ‘the big bad TPA’, and ‘my baby’. Comments referred to the affective consequences of anticipating, executing and completing the TPA, for example, one post referred to ‘many rants and tears’. The emotions communicated in the posts ranged from apprehension to excitement, from despair to relief, pride and celebration. The posts were collegial in nature, offering encouragement and emotional support, and providing and requesting advice, ideas and resources. Some offered insights into their understanding of the content and possible expectations of the TPA. All the posts indicated a belief that efforts to complete the TPA both con- tributed to and demonstrated the development of teaching capabilities. The PSTs perception of their development and demonstration of teaching qual- ity is attested to in many of the posts, through the words but also by the inclusion of selfies that show the preservice and graduate teachers brimming with pride and jubilation. One selfie captured a mock celebration, a picture frame of the GTPA logo beside the score 5/5 held aloft like a trophy. Another selfie captured a celebratory portrait with an affirming comment about the GTPA displayed in a handheld light box. Both selfies required careful execution, and thus reflect the significance of this major capstone task that orientated to PIs. We also noted that the reach of these 46 posts seems to be limited to no more than a few dozen followers who appeared to be close contacts of the preservice or graduate teachers. Similar to data set #1 analysis, there was no discernible pattern separating pre-COVID and COVID eras. Discussions and conclusions Returning to the overarching research question –What are the discourses driv- ing the public commentary of AITSL’s Teaching Performance Assessment task in Australia and what are the inherent implications?—we note three key findings. 1 3 Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media… The first finding is that the legacy media makes no clear distinction between the TPA with other ITE initiatives such as LANTITE. It could be that LANTITE, as a quantifiable and standardised assessment, is easier to understand and report. The second finding is that the TPA information shared by social media is from pre- service teachers only, has a limited reach, and has no contributions from the ITE providers themselves. The third finding is that the social media commentaries about the TPA demonstrate that the preservice and graduate teachers recognise the weight of this major capstone assessment task. Findings one and two are new insights, and finding three aligns with research in Australia and elsewhere. Krie- waldt et  al. (2021) completed a thematic data analysis of survey responses from Australian preservice teachers who reported that through completing the AfGT, they gained an awareness of important teaching capabilities that fostered pro- fessional growth. Chandler-Olcott and Fleming (2017) investigated stakeholder perspectives during the implementation of the edTPA in New York State. Their preservice participants indicated that it was a stressful process, with an impor- tant ‘gatekeeping’ role to the profession, which provided an impetus for them to develop several teaching capabilities. Our data suggest, however, that for the period under scrutiny, those providing legacy media commentary on the broader commission of quality ITE had not yet become aware of the role of the TPA in quality assuring the outcomes of ITE. In earlier research work, the authors (Exley et  al., 2022) found that the legacy media promoted the TPA as akin to a test. The research in hand demonstrates that legacy media comments about ITE orientated to RIs, with some attention to TIs and less attention to MIs and PIs. To date, the labour of public commentary about the TPA has been left to the preservice and graduate teachers who use social media platforms with a small audience reach, and with no discernible input from the ITE provid- ers themselves. Given that teacher quality is often portrayed negatively in the media (see Pendergast et al., 2019), and social media platforms can erupt into fractured and unpleasant spaces, we are not entirely surprised to see the preservice and graduate teachers’ hesitation to proliferate in this space. We also think the dearth of social media commentary from ITE providers presents as an untapped opportunity. Back in 2017, Rowe proffered that close regulation of ITE programmes would direct the focus to the means of surveillance, measurements and accountability itself, rather than the ‘end-goals of accountability’ (p. 12), that is on the quality of the pre- service and graduate teacher. Instead, we would be interested to see if an approach to accountability that features capacity-building with a particular regard for the out- comes of TPAs had the potential to shift the discourses on graduate teacher quality. Our data are limited to a particular timeframe and also limited to available data. Our data, however, suggest that at the time of data collection, in the Australian pub- lic sphere little was known and discussed about TPAs. One reason for this is the time it takes for formal programme accreditation and reaccreditation processes. The find- ings from participation in TPA benchmarking activities do not need to be published until AITSL accreditation stage two (AITSL, 2018, p. 7), which typically takes place approximately five years after a programme has achieved accreditation stage one. Most programmes around the nation were not yet at this stage during the timespan under investigation. As more ITE programmes head towards accreditation stage two, 1 3 D. Pendergast et al. we are looking forward to the opportunities for highlighting the evidence of ITE programme impact and the TPA’s contribution as a capacity-building requirement. Our analysis of the legacy and social media outputs identifies the potential for a range of stakeholders to contribute more visibly to the public discussion on the quality of outcomes and the impact of ITE programmes in Australia. We have yet to see what might be possible when ITE providers use social media platforms to more clearly demonstrate that graduate teachers are meeting the needs and expectations of employers, orientating to the rapidly changing social world, and enacting complex theories of personal, social and cognitive development. Author contributions DP was lead author for this publication and lead in the design of the study, and formation of the argument, review of the Australian context, and data analysis and discussion. BE, as sec- ond author contributed to the design of the study and formation of the argument. She contributed major component of the theoretical lens for data analysis and discussion. FH, as third author, collected the data and applied the theoretical lens to initial data analysis. She made contributions to the formation of the argument and discussion. Funding Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. This research project was funded by a Griffith University Arts, Education and Law Group Learning and Teach- ing Grant, awarded to Pendergast and Exley. Data availability Data comprise the legacy media and social media posts. Publication details for the leg- acy media are included in the references. Details of the social media posts are available by contacting the authors. Declarations Competing interest There is no conflict of interest for any of the authors associated with this submission to The Australian Educational Researcher. Ethical approval Not applicable- our data set comprised publicly available documents like newspaper arti- cles. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Com- mons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/. References Allard, A. C., Mayer, D., & Moss, J. (2014). Authentically assessing graduate teaching: Outside and beyond neo-liberal constructs. The Australian Educational Researcher, 41, 425–443. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s13384- 013- 0140-x 1 3 Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media… Australian Catholic University (ACU). (2018). Factsheet 2: Information for pre-service teachers about the Graduate Teacher Performance Assessment. Australian Catholic University. Retrieved from https:// hmns. uq. edu. au/ files/ 4344/ GTPA% 20Fac tsheet% 20for% 20Pre- Servi ce% 20Tea chers. pdf Australian Government. (2021). Next steps: Report of the quality initial teacher education review. Retrieved from https:// www. dese. gov. au/ quali ty- initi al- teach er- educa tion- review/ resou rces/ next- steps- report- quali ty- initi al- teach er- educa tion- review Australian Government, Department of Health. (2020). Coronavirus (COVD-19) at a glance—31 May 2020. Retrieved from https:// www. health. gov. au/ resou rces/ publi catio ns/ coron avirus- covid- 19- at-a- glance- 31- may- 2020#: ~: text= Descr iption% 3A,new% 20cas es% 20rep orted% 20each% 20day. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2018). Accreditation of Initial Teacher Education programs in Australia: Standards and procedures. Retrieved from https:// www. aitsl. edu. au/ docs/ defau lt- source/ natio nal- policy- frame work/ accre ditat ion- of- initi al- teach er- educa tion- progr ams- in- austr alia. pdf? sfvrsn= e87c ff3c_ 22 Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2020). The Teacher Education Minis- terial Advisory Group. Retrieved from https:// www. educa tion. gov. au/ teach er- educa tion- minis terial- advis ory- group. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2022). Teaching performance assess- ment. https:// www. aitsl. edu. au/ deliv er- ite- progr ams/ teach ing- perfo rmance- asses sment Baker, J. (2020, May 29). Calls for national plan to attract top students. The Sydney Morning Herald, 17. Baroutsis, A., & Lingard, B. (2019). Headlines and hashtags herald new ‘damaging effects’: Media and Australia’s declining PISA performance. In A. Baroutsis, S. Riddle, & P. Thompson (Eds.), Educa- tion research and the media: Challenges and possibilities (pp. 27–46). Routledge. Baroutsis, A., & Woods, A. (2020). Academic research and public debates: A media analysis of the pro- posed Australian phonics check. In A. Woods & B. Exley (Eds.), Literacies in early childhood: Foundations for equity and quality (pp. 288–299). Oxford University Press. Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the lit- erature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (Revised). Rowman & Littlefield. Campbell, C., Cuauhtemoc Ayala, C., Railsback, R., Freking, F. W., McKenna, C., & Lausch, D. (2016). Beginning teachers’ perceptions of the California Teaching Performance Assessment (PTA). Teacher Education Quarterly, 43(2), 51–71. Canter, L. (2018). It’s not all cat videos: Moving beyond legacy media and tackling the challenges of mapping news values on digital native websites. Digital Journalism, 6(8), 1101. Carey, A. (2020, April 27). Teacher trainee class hours slashed to avoid shortfall. The Age, 4. Carey, A., & Hunter, F. (2019, December 3). Alarm bells: Students falling behind in maths, science and reading. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from https:// www. smh. com. au/ polit ics/ feder al/ alarm- bells- austr alian- stude nts- falli ng- behind- in- maths- scien ce- and- readi ng- 20191 203- p53gho. html Chandler-Olcott, K., & Fleming, S. (2017). Multiple perspectives on the state-mandated implementa- tion of a high-stakes performance assessment for preservice English teacher candidates. Action in Teacher Education, 39(1), 22–38. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 01626 620. 2016. 12527 03 Cochrane-Smith, M. (2016). Foreword. In The Teacher Education Group (Ed.), Teacher education in times of change (pp. x–xvi). Policy Press. Cochran-Smith, M., Baker, M., Burton, S., Chang, W.-C., Carney, M. C., Fernández, M. B., Keefe, E. S., Miller, A. F., & Sánchez, J. G. (2017). The accountability era in US teacher education: Looking back, looking forward. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(5), 572–588. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 02619 768. 2017. 13850 61 Commonwealth of Australia. (2019). House of Representatives Standing Committee on Employment, Education and Training Status of the Teaching Profession. Retrieved from https:// www. aph. gov. au/ Parli ament ary_ Busin ess/ Commi ttees/ House/ Emplo yment_ Educa tion_ and_ Train ing/ Teach ingPr ofess ionNew/ Report. Exley, B., & Chan, M. Y. (2014). Tensions between policy and practice: Reconciliation agendas in the Australian Curriculum English. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 13(1), 55–75. Exley, B., & Kitson, L. (2018, October, 22–24). Teaching the teachers to teach phonics: Voices from teacher education. Professional Educator. Exley, B., Pendergast, D., & Hoyte, F. (2022). Social discourses on the teacher performance assess- ment: Media tales, twitter tweets and leadership surveys. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (online), 41(1), 1–13. 1 3 D. Pendergast et al. Fishburn, D. (2019a, October 25). Being a teacher takes more than you might think. The Courier-Mail, Fishburn, D. (2019b, October 25). Valuing the work of teachers. The Cairns Post, 16. Fishburn, D. (2020, January 17). Rest assured, Queensland’s teachers are the best. The Courier-Mail, 30. Goodwin, A. L. (2020). Globalization, global mindsets and teacher education. Action in Teacher Educa- tion, 42(1), 6–18. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 01626 620. 2019. 17008 48 Hopkins, B. (2020, January 24). FedUni professor secures prestigious scholarship. The Courier (Bal- larat), 2. Hoyte, F., Singh, P., Heimans, S., & Exley, B. (2020). Discourses of quality in Australian teacher educa- tion: Critical policy analysis of a government inquiry into the status of the profession. In J. Fox, C. Alexander, & T. Aspland (Eds.), Teacher education in globalised times (pp. 159–177). Springer. Joseph, B. (2019, December 4). Slipping standards to blame for poor result. The Courier-Mail, 20. Keogh, J., & Garrick, B. (2011). Creating catch 22: Zooming in and zooming out of the discursive con- structions of teachers in a news article. Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(4), 419–434. Kriewaldt, J., Walker, R., Morey, V., & Morrison, C. (2021). Activating and reinforcing graduates’ capa- bilities: Early lessons learned from a teaching performance assessment. The Australian Educational Researcher, 48, 681–696. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s13384- 020- 00418-4 Lang, K. (2020, January 18). Raise the bar for better teachers. The Courier-Mail, 51. Loughland, T., & Bostwick, K. (2022). A taxonomy of clinical reasoning for pre-service teachers on professional experience. The Australian Educational Researcher. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s13384- 022- 00568-7 Maclean, D. (2020, January 20). Letter to the editor. The Courier-Mail, 24. Mitchell, S. (2019, December 7). Recognise that marks matter to stop 20-year education slide. Sydney Morning Herald, 33. O’Flaherty, A, (2020, January 17). Education standards defended. The Courier-Mail, 16. O’Meara, J., & MacDonald, D. (2004). Power, prestige and pedagogic identity: A tale of two programs recontextualising teacher standards. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), 111–127. Olsen, B. (2008). Teaching what they learn, learning what they live. Paradigm Publishers. Pausigere, P., & Graven, M. (2013). Unveiling the South African official primary mathematics teacher pedagogic identity. Perspectives in Education, 31(3), 19–33. Pendergast, D., Exley, B., Bahr, N., & Ferreira, J. (2019). Social media and teacher professionalism: Get- ting in on the act. In A. Gutierrez, J. Fox, & C. Alexander (Eds.), Professionalism and teacher edu- cation: Voices from policy and practice (pp. 27–46). Springer. Pendergast, D., Exley, B., O’Brien, M., Du Plessis, A., Main, K., & Anderson, T. (2020). learning@home WIL Initiative Evaluation. Retrieved from https:// resea rch- repos itory. gri ffith. edu. au/ bitst ream/ han- dle/ 10072/ 405802/ Pende rgast 500426- Publi shed. pdf? seque nce=3. Reid, J. (2019). What’s good enough? Teacher education and the practice challenge. The Australian Edu- cational Researcher, 46, 715–734. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s13384- 019- 00348-w Rowan, L., Mayer, D., Kline, J. et al. (2015). Investigating the effectiveness of teacher education for early career teachers in diverse settings: The longitudinal research we have to have. The Australian Edu- cational Researcher, 42, 273–298. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s13384- 014- 0163-y Rowe, E. (2017). UNESCO Country case prepared for the 2017/8 global education monitoring report: Accountability in education: Meeting our commitment. Australia country case study. UNESCO. Retrieved from https:// unesd oc. unesco. org/ ark:/ 48223/ pf000 02595 41 Scholes, L., Lampert, J., Burnett, B., Comber, B., Hoff, L., & Ferguson, A. (2017). The politics of quality teacher discourses: Implications for pre-service teachers in high poverty schools. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 19–43. Simpson Reeves, S., Exley, B., & Dillon-Wallace, J. (2018). Secondary school English teachers caught in the NAPLAN Fray: Effects of the disparate responses. English in Australia, 53(1), 24–32. Singhal, P. (2019, April 21). ‘Profession in crisis’: Warning about teacher shortage risk. Sydney Morning Herald. https:// www. smh. com. au/ educa tion/ profe ssion- in- crisis- teach er- short age- predi cted- in- next- four- years- 20190 417- p51f2q. html Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group (TEMAG). (2014). Action Now: Classroom ready teach- ers. Retrieved from https:// docs. educa tion. gov. au/ docum ents/ action- now- class room- ready- teach ers- report. Teachers could learn from report. (2019, October 1). Sydney Morning Herald, 20. The University of Melbourne. (n.d.). AfGT assessment task summary. Retrieved from https:// educa tion. unime lb. edu. au/__ data/ assets/ pdf_ file/ 0009/ 28783 62/ AfGT- Visua lSequ ence- v1.0- 21021 81. pdf. 1 3 Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media… Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., Underwood, C., & Schmid, M. (2019). PISA 2018 in Brief I: Student perfor- mance. Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). Retrieved from https:// resea rch. acer. edu. au/ ozpisa/ 34 Tudge, A. (2021). Initial teacher education review launched. Retrieved from https:// minis ters. dese. gov. au/ tudge/ initi al- teaac her- educa tion- review- launc hed UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2020). Teachers. Retrieved from http:// uis. unesco. org/ en/ topic/ teach ers White, S., Murray, J., Goodwin, A. L., Kosnik, C., & Beck, C. (2020). On the shoulders of giants: Advice for beginning teacher educators. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 49(5), 566–579. Wilkie, K. (2020, March 2). Australia’s most epic parent-teacher row EVER. Daily Mail Australia. Retrieved from https:// www. daily mail. co. uk/ news/ artic le- 80632 05/ Extra ordin ary- social- media- row- spark ed- late- night- ambush- princ ipals- home. html Willis, L., & Exley, B. (2018). Using an online social media space to engage parents in student learning in the early years: Enablers and impediments. Digital Education Review, 33, 87–104. Zeichner, K. (2020). Preparing teachers as democratic professionals. Action in Teacher Education, 42(1), 38–48. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 01626 620. 2019. 17008 47 Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Donna Pendergast is Director, Engagement in the Arts, Education and Law Group and former Dean and Head of the School of Education and Professional Studies at Griffith University, Australia (2009–2023). She commenced her career as a secondary school classroom teacher. Her expertise includes student engagement and teacher professional learning. Donna led the team preparing Queensland government schools for the introduction of Junior Secondary phase and the shift of Year 7 into secondary in 2015. She undertook similar work in South Australia across sectors for the shift in 2022. Donna works at state and national levels in shaping education policy including as: a member of the Board of the Australian Institute of Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL)  (2018); Chair of the Teacher Education Expert Standing Committee (TEESC) of AITSL (2019); Chair of the Queensland Educational Leadership Insti- tute (QELi) (2018–2022); Chair of the Queensland Council of Deans of Education (QCDE)(2016–2022) and Vice President of the Australian Council of Deans of Education (ACDE (2021–2022). Donna is also a member of the National Council for Be You (2021). Donna has been acknowledged for her leadership impact and is the recipient of the Vice Chancellor’s Research Supervision Award for Excellence (2016) and in 2018 was awarded the Australian Council for Educational Leadership Miller-Grassie Award for Outstanding Leadership in Education. In 2022 Donna received the Australian Council of Deans of Educa- tion Award for Outstanding Service to Education and the Council. Beryl Exley is a teaching and research Professor with the School of Education and Professional Studies at Griffith University. She has been Deputy Head of School (2018–2022) with special responsibility for the Australian Institute of Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) and Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA) accreditation for the initial teacher education programs. Beryl com- menced her teacher education journey with an undergraduate and master level qualifications in education and worked in early childhood and primary school settings for a decade. She completed her PhD at the Queensland University of Technology in 2005 and has been working in teacher education since that time. Her research interests are in English Curriculum, enactment of teacher knowledge and pedagogic rights for a range of stakeholders. She is a past National President of the Australian Literacy Educators’ Asso- ciation (ALEA) and is a proud ALEA life member. Frances Hoyte contributes to teaching and research at the  School of Education and Professional Stud- ies at Griffith University and currently also works in a state school as an Inclusion teacher. Her career in education has spanned several decades, including classroom teaching, and school and regional leadership positions in both suburban and rural areas. She has been involved in continuing teacher education through advisory and leadership roles in state schools. More recently she has contributed to teacher education as la  ecturer and tutor in initial teacher education programs. Her research interests include children’s lan- guage and literacy development, and policy and practice issues in teacher education. 1 3

Journal

The Australian Educational Researcher – Springer Journals

Published: May 23, 2023

Keywords: Teaching performance assessment; Initial teacher education; Accreditation; Legacy media; Social media; Teacher quality

There are no references for this article.