Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[The chapter compares the 1966 and 1969 seminars, looks at context (Princeton’s receptivity to innovation), and considers counterfactuals (what if the seminar students had been hand-picked?). The editor compares his own instructional modifications to History 308, highlighting how he and Martin both retained traditional practices within their experimental ventures.]
Published: Nov 9, 2021
Keywords: Martin Duberman; College radicalism; Princeton University; Robert Hampel
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.