Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative DiscourseDialectical Profiles and Indicators of Argumentative Moves

Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Dialectical Profiles and Indicators... [The study of argumentation is prospering. After its brilliant start in Antiquity, highlighted in the classical works of Aristotle, after an alternation of ups and downs during the following millennia, in the post-Renaissance period its gradual decline set in. Revitalization took place only after Toulmin and Perelman published in the same year (1958) their landmark works The Uses of Argument and La nouvelle rhétorique (co-authored by Olbrechts-Tyteca and translated into English in 1969). The model of argumentation presented by Toulmin and Perelman’s inventory of argumentation techniques inspired a great many scholars in various ways to take up the study of argumentation in a serious manner. Nowadays there are well-established (formal as well as informal) logical approaches to argumentation, but also social and socio-psychological, linguistic, juridical and other approaches. In most of these approaches traces can be found of the influence of the classical and neo-classical argumentation theories just mentioned.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative DiscourseDialectical Profiles and Indicators of Argumentative Moves

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/reasonableness-and-effectiveness-in-argumentative-discourse-Dh6eL7SLv0

References (75)

Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
ISBN
978-3-319-20954-8
Pages
681 –702
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_36
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[The study of argumentation is prospering. After its brilliant start in Antiquity, highlighted in the classical works of Aristotle, after an alternation of ups and downs during the following millennia, in the post-Renaissance period its gradual decline set in. Revitalization took place only after Toulmin and Perelman published in the same year (1958) their landmark works The Uses of Argument and La nouvelle rhétorique (co-authored by Olbrechts-Tyteca and translated into English in 1969). The model of argumentation presented by Toulmin and Perelman’s inventory of argumentation techniques inspired a great many scholars in various ways to take up the study of argumentation in a serious manner. Nowadays there are well-established (formal as well as informal) logical approaches to argumentation, but also social and socio-psychological, linguistic, juridical and other approaches. In most of these approaches traces can be found of the influence of the classical and neo-classical argumentation theories just mentioned.]

Published: Oct 16, 2015

Keywords: Critical Discussion; Argumentation Structure; Rhetorical Question; Argumentative Discourse; Strategic Manoeuvring

There are no references for this article.