Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative DiscourseFallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective

Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical... [In the pragma-dialectical approach, fallacies are considered incorrect moves in a discussion for which the goal is successful resolution of a dispute. Ten rules are given for effective conduct at the various stages of such a critical discussion (confrontation, opening, argumentation, concluding). Fallacies are discussed as violations of these rules, taking into account all speech acts which are traditionally recognized as fallacies. Special attention is paid to the role played by implicitness in fallacies in everyday language use. It is stressed that identifying and acknowledging fallacies in ordinary discussions always has a conditional character. Differences between the pragma-dialectical perspective, the Standard Treatment, and the formal logic approach to fallacy analysis are discussed.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative DiscourseFallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/reasonableness-and-effectiveness-in-argumentative-discourse-fallacies-E47nx1uFtp

References (14)

Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
ISBN
978-3-319-20954-8
Pages
557 –574
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_29
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[In the pragma-dialectical approach, fallacies are considered incorrect moves in a discussion for which the goal is successful resolution of a dispute. Ten rules are given for effective conduct at the various stages of such a critical discussion (confrontation, opening, argumentation, concluding). Fallacies are discussed as violations of these rules, taking into account all speech acts which are traditionally recognized as fallacies. Special attention is paid to the role played by implicitness in fallacies in everyday language use. It is stressed that identifying and acknowledging fallacies in ordinary discussions always has a conditional character. Differences between the pragma-dialectical perspective, the Standard Treatment, and the formal logic approach to fallacy analysis are discussed.]

Published: Oct 16, 2015

Keywords: Argument; Argumentation; Critical discussion; Fallacies; Pragma-dialectical perspective; Speech acts

There are no references for this article.