Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative DiscourseLinguistic Criteria for Judging Composition and Division Fallacies

Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Linguistic Criteria for Judging... [In the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation fallacies are defined as violations of rules for critical discussion that further the resolution of differences of opinion on the merits. Viewed within this perspective, fallacies are wrong discussion moves. Such moves can occur in every stage of the resolution process and they can be made by both parties. Among the wrong moves that may occur in the argumentation stage are the fallacies of composition and division.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative DiscourseLinguistic Criteria for Judging Composition and Division Fallacies

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/reasonableness-and-effectiveness-in-argumentative-discourse-linguistic-pY4B0SLFNH

References (5)

Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
ISBN
978-3-319-20954-8
Pages
595 –609
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_31
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[In the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation fallacies are defined as violations of rules for critical discussion that further the resolution of differences of opinion on the merits. Viewed within this perspective, fallacies are wrong discussion moves. Such moves can occur in every stage of the resolution process and they can be made by both parties. Among the wrong moves that may occur in the argumentation stage are the fallacies of composition and division.]

Published: Oct 16, 2015

Keywords: Critical Discussion; Argument Scheme; Valid Argument; Argumentative Discourse; Validity Rule

There are no references for this article.