Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation TheoryIdentifying the Warrant of an Argument

Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory: Identifying the Warrant of an Argument [Hitchcock has presented a way to extract the warrant from an argument. We summarize his procedure and note that applying it in specific cases may be problematic. We then extend his procedure by indicating how symbolization in a formal language addresses the problems. We indicate the richness required of such a language and then present an expanded procedure for identifying the warrant of an argument.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation TheoryIdentifying the Warrant of an Argument

Part of the Argumentation Library Book Series (volume 28)
Editors: van Eemeren, Frans H.; Garssen, Bart
Freeman, James B.
Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory — Aug 9, 2015
Download PDF
14 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/reflections-on-theoretical-issues-in-argumentation-theory-identifying-r80PaCJhw3

References (4)

Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
ISBN
978-3-319-21102-2
Pages
93 –106
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-21103-9_7
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[Hitchcock has presented a way to extract the warrant from an argument. We summarize his procedure and note that applying it in specific cases may be problematic. We then extend his procedure by indicating how symbolization in a formal language addresses the problems. We indicate the richness required of such a language and then present an expanded procedure for identifying the warrant of an argument.]

Published: Aug 9, 2015

Keywords: Conclusive; Defeasible; Formal language; Hitchcock; Identification procedure; Symbolization key; Warrant

There are no references for this article.