Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Greenwald (1968)
6 – Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change1
A. Henkemans, F. Eemeren, R. Grootendorst (2002)
Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation
Jens Kjeldsen (2015)
The Rhetoric of Thick Representation: How Pictures Render the Importance and Strength of an Argument SalientArgumentation, 29
F. Eemeren, B. Garssen, Bert Meuffels (2009)
Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness, Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules, 16
C. Tindale (1992)
Audiences, relevance, and cognitive environmentsArgumentation, 6
William Benoit, M. Smythe (2003)
Rhetorical theory as message reception: A cognitive response approach to rhetorical theory and criticismCommunication Studies, 54
C. Tindale (2013)
Rhetorical Argumentation and the Nature of Audience: Toward an Understanding of Audience—Issues in ArgumentationPhilosophy & Rhetoric, 46
Edward Mcquarrie, David Mick (1996)
Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising LanguageJournal of Consumer Research, 22
F. Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden, Gordon Mitchell (2011)
Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation
Deirdre Wilson, D. Sperber (2012)
Meaning and Relevance
P. Wander (1984)
The third persona: An ideological turn in rhetorical theoryCommunication Studies, 35
C. Tindale (1999)
Acts of arguing : a rhetorical model of argument
Ien Ang (1991)
Desperately seeking the audience
J. Searle (1969)
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language
T. Govier (1999)
The Philosophy of Argument
Barbara Phillips, Edward Mcquarrie (2004)
Beyond Visual Metaphor: A New Typology of Visual Rhetoric in AdvertisingMarketing Theory, 4
Snoeck Henkemans (2014)
Speech Act Theory and the Study of ArgumentationStudies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 36
Jens Kjeldsen (2007)
Visual Argumentation in Scandinavian Political Advertising: A Cognitive, Contextual, and Reception Oriented ApproachArgumentation and Advocacy, 43
Jens Kjeldsen (2012)
Pictorial Argumentation in Advertising: Visual Tropes and Figures as a Way of Creating Visual Argumentation
Ralph Johnson (2013)
The Role of Audience in Argumentation from the Perspective of Informal LogicPhilosophy & Rhetoric, 46
R. Petty, J. Cacioppo (1981)
Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches
[It has been argued that the reconstruction of pictorial and visual argumentation is especially problematic since pictures contain neither words nor precise reference to premises, nor do they have syntax or explicit conjunctions that coordinate premise and conclusions.]
Published: Aug 9, 2015
Keywords: Focus Group; Focus Group Interview; Focus Group Study; Visual Argumentation; Rhetorical Argumentation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.