Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Amenta, A. Timmeren (2018)
Beyond Wastescapes: Towards Circular Landscapes. Addressing the Spatial Dimension of Circularity through the Regeneration of WastescapesSustainability
N. Golubiewski (2012)
Is There a Metabolism of an Urban Ecosystem? An Ecological CritiqueAMBIO, 41
S. Barthel, C. Isendahl, Benjamin Vis, A. Drescher, D. Evans, A. Timmeren (2019)
Global urbanization and food production in direct competition for land: Leverage places to mitigate impacts on SDG2 and on the Earth SystemThe Anthropocene Review, 6
Ning Wang, J. Lee, Jian Zhang, Haitao Chen, Heng Li (2018)
Evaluation of Urban circular economy development: An empirical research of 40 cities in ChinaJournal of Cleaner Production, 180
S. Pincetl, P. Bunje, T. Holmes (2012)
An expanded urban metabolism method: Toward a systems approach for assessing urban energy processes and causesLandscape and Urban Planning, 107
P. Loconte, V. Partipilo, F. Rotondo (2013)
Multidimensional Approaches to Evaluate Urban Planning Scenarios
V. Broto, A. Allen, E. Rapoport (2012)
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Urban MetabolismJournal of Industrial Ecology, 16
A. Wolman (1965)
THE METABOLISM OF CITIES.Scientific American, 213
D. Beloin-Saint-Pierre, B. Rugani, S. Lasvaux, A. Mailhac, Emil Popovici, Galdric Sibiude, E. Benetto, N. Schiopu (2017)
A review of urban metabolism studies to identify key methodological choices for future harmonization and implementationJournal of Cleaner Production, 163
Hermann Haken (1988)
SynergeticsIEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine, 4
C. d’Amour, F. Reitsma, G. Baiocchi, S. Barthel, Burak Güneralp, K. Erb, H. Haberl, F. Creutzig, K. Seto (2016)
Future urban land expansion and implications for global croplandsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114
H. Girardet (2014)
Creating Regenerative Cities
M. Grubb (2001)
Relying on Manna from Heaven?Science, 294
Alejandro Padilla‐Rivera, Sara Russo-Garrido, Nicolas Merveille (2020)
Addressing the Social Aspects of a Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature ReviewSustainability
E. Loiseau, L. Aissani, S. Féon, F. Laurent, J. Cerceau, Serenella Sala, P. Roux (2018)
Territorial Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): What exactly is it about? A proposal towards using a common terminology and a research agendaJournal of Cleaner Production, 176
M. Pérez-Soba, S. Petit, L. Jones, N. Bertrand, V. Briquel, L. Omodei-Zorini, C. Contini, K. Helming, J. Farrington, M. Mossello, D. Wascher, F. Kienast, R. Groot (2008)
Land use functions — a multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability
J. Horbach, C. Rammer, K. Rennings (2011)
Determinants of Eco-innovations by Type of Environmental Impact: The Role of Regulatory Push/Pull, Technology Push and Market PullERN: Econometric Modeling in Microeconomics (Topic)
Han Gao, X. Tian, Yan Zhang, Lei Shi, F. Shi (2021)
Evaluating circular economy performance based on ecological network analysis: A framework and application at city levelResources Conservation and Recycling, 168
J. Vliet, David Eitelberg, P. Verburg (2017)
A global analysis of land take in cropland areas and production displacement from urbanizationGlobal Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 43
E. Soja (2011)
Beyond PostmetropolisUrban Geography, 32
M. Torricelli (2015)
ES-LCA e patrimonio naturale, 2
J. Korhonen, Cali Nuur, A. Feldmann, Seyoum Birkie (2018)
Circular economy as an essentially contested conceptJournal of Cleaner Production, 175
M. Dijst, E. Worrell, L. Böcker, P. Brunner, S. Davoudi, S. Geertman, R. Harmsen, M. Helbich, A. Holtslag, M. Kwan, B. Lenz, G. Lyons, P. Mokhtarian, Peter Newman, A. Perrels, Ana Ribeiro, J. Carreón, Giles Thomson, D. Ürge-Vorsatz, M. Zeyringer (2017)
Exploring urban metabolism-Towards an interdisciplinary perspectiveResources Conservation and Recycling, 132
[In this first chapter of the Book “Regenerative Territories. Dimensions of Circularity for Healthy Metabolisms”, the relation between circularity and space is explored. The main focus is the development over time, and in particular the way how spatial planning and strategies respond to new unpredictable urgencies and opportunities related with territorial metabolisms. In relation to space and time, 5 grand rules are explored as necessary to implement the transition towards Circularity: (1) The Circular Economy paradigm shift requires a socio-ecological perspective and looking beyond boundaries; (2) Circular Economy is based on systems thinking and territorial metabolism; (3) a Circular Economy calls for a renewed approach to the public domain and stakeholder involvement; (4) amplifying the definition of Circular Economy with the inclusion of wastescapes; and (5) Planning the Circular Economy as an open collaborative system. The paradigm shift of contemporary planning towards circularity is aimed to facilitate the capacity of cities to be adaptive and flexible to the speeding up of the biggest changes in the present-day society. Therefore, the relation between the various spatial scales is strictly interlinked to the time scales, as well as to the metabolic processes and Life Cycles of Territories. In this perspective, the “existing city” is a non-negotiable common heritage, the result of a “selective accumulation” of material and immaterial traces produced by the slow and progressive anthropic work in the territory. Contemporary spatial planning looks beyond boundaries. This concerns both the physical boundaries between areas or countries, both the boundaries of the various scale levels of solutions, of the interrelated networks, of the public space and, particularly, of their reciprocity. It induces the scrutinization of the underlying social needs and the finding of instruments that allow the spatial planning and renewed infrastructure to fit the changing social objectives such as sustainability and liveability. The territory of the Circular Economy is the city, as a complex and multidimensional organism. However, the most problematic field for experimenting with “circular planning” is the peri-urban territory consisting of urbanized areas, crossed by differentiated phenomena of settlement expansion beyond the limits of the countryside, which identifies rural and open space, traditionally coinciding with the limits of the city. A circular planning for the regeneration of the peri-urban identifies the waste spaces, the decay of the territory, the obsolescence and end of life of buildings, functions and urban parts now inadequate, namely wasted landscapes (wastescapes). The latter are both the result of metabolic transformations of the territory and generator of prospects and potential for rebalancing the material welfare of the city.]
Published: Feb 7, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.