Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[In this chapter, we present a selection of results from our fund of numerical experiments. We methodically focus on the approach based upon the numerical solution of the system (3.17) of nonlinear Hammerstein integral equations, as described in Chaps. 3 and 6. The finite element method from Chap. 5 has also been implemented and successfully tested (Angermann, Yatsyk, Int J Electromagn Waves Electron Syst 13(12), 15–30, 2008, [1]) (Hoff, Numerische Simulation der Oberwellengeneration in nichtlinearen elektromagnetischen Diffraktionsproblemen. Diploma thesis (supervisor: L. Angermann), Department of Mathematics, Clausthal University of Technology, 2014, [2]). Since the obtained approximations to the solution of the boundary value problem (1.66) were largely comparable to the numerical results for the system (3.17) and thus did not provide any other (or even new) findings, we have omitted a similarly detailed description and discussion of the finite element results. Nevertheless, we have included a few comments on these results.]
Published: Jul 27, 2018
Keywords: Nonlinear Hammerstein Integral Equations; Nonlinear Dielectric Permittivity; Eigen Fields; Preset Field; Incident Field
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.