Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Thomas Lindemann (2010)
Causes of War: The Struggle for Recognition
Ian Lustick (1996)
History, Historiography, and Political Science: Multiple Historical Records and the Problem of Selection BiasAmerican Political Science Review, 90
H. Strachan (2004)
The Outbreak of the First World War
E. Mortimer (2016)
War and Democratic Constraint: How the Public Influences Foreign PolicyThe RUSI Journal, 161
B. Bernstein, G. Allison, Philip Zelikow (1971)
Essence of Decision
[The purpose of this contribution is to steer between the idiographic and nomothetic poles, and to present in action the method of structured, focalized and controlled comparisons that are liable to produce “contextualized” “intermediary” theories. I will outline the explanative potential of “chrono-logics” and specific contexts. The emphasis will at first be put on the merits and limits of “particularistic” conceptions of social phenomena, then on underlining the advantages and problems of “covering law,” an ambition of the dominant approaches. Finally, I will demonstrate the focalized and controlled comparison method and will show how it provides a way of analyzing international crises between times of war and peace without misrecognizing the particularity of “cases.”]
Published: Oct 21, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.