Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Philip Schrodt (2014)
Seven deadly sins of contemporary quantitative political analysisJournal of Peace Research, 51
[Quantitative methods are increasingly used in research on international relations. The present chapter documents this increased use and highlights with three examples how such methods allow to address important research questions in international relations. In addition, it emphasizes that the use of these methods relies on various assumptions that are quite explicit, many of which are also necessary to use qualitative methods to make causal inferences.]
Published: Oct 21, 2017
Keywords: United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC); Lars-Erik Cederman; Quantitative methodsQuantitative Methods; UN Human; wordsWords
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.