Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Responding to Sexual OffendingThe Realities of Legislating Against and Protecting the Public from Risky Groups

Responding to Sexual Offending: The Realities of Legislating Against and Protecting the Public... [In the world of public protection the application of sanctions to those assessed as posing a risk of harm takes a significant departure from how most offenders are dealt with. In essence, this distinction is simple to understand; it is based upon the harm people might pose in the future as much as on the harm they have already done. In other words they are to be dealt with for potential, future crimes or harmful behaviour. Indeed, in the most recent developments, discussed below, it is not even necessary for some individuals to have a previous history of criminal behaviour. They, like others, can be brought into the ‘system’ through the use of civil-law-based measures grounded upon a suspicion (or some might say prediction) that they might harm individuals in the future. Underpinning these measures and in essence forming their central rationale is the assessment of the risk of harm an individual may pose to the public. We will discuss risk assessment elsewhere in this chapter and it runs as a theme throughout the volume. Suffice it to say that there should be sufficient doubts about its effectiveness to at least pause the constant introduction of new criminal, civil and regulatory measures deployed against this group. However, any analysis of these measures over the past 2 decades might suggest that the only caution exercised has been the reluctance to be more discriminating in the use of the high-risk or dangerous label; indeed, public protection has become a very inclusive agenda.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Responding to Sexual OffendingThe Realities of Legislating Against and Protecting the Public from Risky Groups

Editors: McCartan, Kieran

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/responding-to-sexual-offending-the-realities-of-legislating-against-8ch0qoq8Mm

References (50)

Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan UK
Copyright
© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014
ISBN
978-1-349-47099-0
Pages
1 –19
DOI
10.1057/9781137358134_1
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[In the world of public protection the application of sanctions to those assessed as posing a risk of harm takes a significant departure from how most offenders are dealt with. In essence, this distinction is simple to understand; it is based upon the harm people might pose in the future as much as on the harm they have already done. In other words they are to be dealt with for potential, future crimes or harmful behaviour. Indeed, in the most recent developments, discussed below, it is not even necessary for some individuals to have a previous history of criminal behaviour. They, like others, can be brought into the ‘system’ through the use of civil-law-based measures grounded upon a suspicion (or some might say prediction) that they might harm individuals in the future. Underpinning these measures and in essence forming their central rationale is the assessment of the risk of harm an individual may pose to the public. We will discuss risk assessment elsewhere in this chapter and it runs as a theme throughout the volume. Suffice it to say that there should be sufficient doubts about its effectiveness to at least pause the constant introduction of new criminal, civil and regulatory measures deployed against this group. However, any analysis of these measures over the past 2 decades might suggest that the only caution exercised has been the reluctance to be more discriminating in the use of the high-risk or dangerous label; indeed, public protection has become a very inclusive agenda.]

Published: Nov 30, 2015

Keywords: Criminal Justice; Criminal Justice System; Sexual Offence; Violent Offender; Life Sentence

There are no references for this article.