Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[Throughout this research we heard time and time again that schooling was an alienating experience for many students. Haberman (Phi Delta Kappan 73(4): 290–294, 1991) believes that ‘the pedagogy of poverty’, by which he means instructional techniques based on transmission models of teaching and learning (e.g., ‘chalk and talk’, ‘question and answer’ and ‘rote memorisation’), is to blame. This chapter sets out to advance an alternative vision of teaching based on Freire’s (Pedagogy of freedom: ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Rowman & Littlefield, New York, 1998) notion of a ‘pedagogy of hope’ that seeks to cultivate a more optimistic and humane form of collaborative and critically engaged learning that gives students a greater say over what and how they learn and with whom. In this chapter, we describe some ways in which schools might go about the task of reinvigorating pedagogy based on the needs and interests of students. From the point of view of students this involves:creating hospitable places for learningdeveloping interests and passionsengaging with big ideas.]
Published: Jan 9, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.