Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Dolan (2014)
Has Patriarchy been Stealing the Feminists' Clothes? Conflict?related Sexual Violence and UN Security Council ResolutionsIDS Bulletin, 45
R. Grey, Laura Shepherd (2013)
“Stop Rape Now?”Men and Masculinities, 16
K. Theidon (2009)
Reconstructing Masculinities: The Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration of Former Combatants in ColombiaHuman Rights Quarterly, 31
R. Es (2002)
Moral Compromise: Owen and Holbrooke Mediating the Bosnia ConflictInternational Negotiation, 7
K. Askin (2003)
Prosecuting Wartime Rape and Other Gender- Related Crimes under International Law: Extraordinary Advances, Enduring ObstaclesBerkeley Journal of International Law, 21
Joshua Goldstein (2001)
War and gender: How gender shapes the war system and vice versa.
Nancy Levit, N. Dowd, Ann McGinley (2011)
Feminist Legal Theory Meets Masculinities Theory
J. Webber (2006)
Legal Pluralism and Human AgencyOsgoode Hall Law Journal
Kimberly Hutchings (2008)
Making Sense of Masculinity and WarMen and Masculinities, 10
R. Nye (2007)
Western Masculinities in War and PeaceThe American Historical Review, 112
C. Bell (2015)
Text and Context: Evaluating Peace Agreements for their "Gender Perspective"
H. Charlesworth (2008)
Are Women Peaceful? Reflections on the Role of Women in Peace-BuildingFeminist Legal Studies, 16
C. Bell (2016)
Lex Pacificatoria Colombiana: Colombia’s Peace Accord in Comparative PerspectiveAJIL Unbound, 110
C. Mackinnon (1991)
Reflections on Sex Equality Under LawYale Law Journal, 100
S. Sivakumaran (2007)
Sexual Violence Against Men in Armed ConflictEuropean Journal of International Law, 18
S. Sivakumaran (2010)
Lost in translation: UN responses to sexual violence against men and boys in situations of armed conflictInternational Review of the Red Cross, 92
Philipp Kastner (2015)
Legal Normativity in the Resolution of Internal Armed Conflict
A. Harris (2000)
Gender Violence, Race, and Criminal JusticeStanford Law Review, 52
I. Milojević (2012)
Transforming Violent Masculinities in Serbia and Beyond
Naomi Cahn, F. Aoláin (2010)
Gender, Masculinities and Transition in Conflicted SocietiesNew England Law Review, 44
R. Ford (2007)
What's Queer about Race?South Atlantic Quarterly, 106
Dianne Otto (2010)
Power and Danger: Feminist Engagement with International Law through the UN Security CouncilAustralian Feminist Law Journal, 32
Martha-Marie Kleinhans, R. Macdonald (1997)
What is a Critical Legal Pluralism?Canadian journal of law and society, 12
J. Butler (1988)
PERFORMATIVE ACTS AND GENDER CONSTITUTION: AN ESSAY IN PHENOMENOLOGY AND FEMINIST THEORYTheatre Journal, 40
Márie O'Reilly, Andrea Súilleabháin, T. Paffenholz (2015)
Reimagining peacemaking: women's roles in peace processes
R. Holbrooke (1999)
How to end a war
C. Chinkin (1999)
A critique of the public/private dimensionEuropean Journal of International Law, 10
Christin Ormhaug, P. Meier, H. Hernes (2009)
Armed Conflict Deaths Disaggregated by Gender
L. Costin (1982)
Feminism, pacifism, internationalism and the 1915 international congress of womenWomens Studies International Forum, 5
D. Haynes, Fionnuala Aolain, Naomi Cahn (2011)
Masculinities and Child Soldiers in Post-Conflict SocietiesLaw & Culture eJournal
J. Galtung (1969)
Violence, Peace, and Peace ResearchJournal of Peace Research, 6
[Gender plays a fundamental role in war- and peace-making, but the opportunities to reconsider unequal gender relations in the context of peace negotiations have, so far, largely been missed. This chapter argues that peace negotiations are unique opportunities to address structural inequalities in society and the gendered dimensions of violence. In particular, the construction and performance of hegemonic masculinities and hypermasculinities cause and sustain armed conflicts, and they continue to play an influential role in post-conflict societies. While gender has unhelpfully been equated with women in dominant conflict resolution and international legal discourses, exposing and transforming masculinities in the context of peace negotiations can contribute to gender justice and to the lasting resolution of armed conflicts. This chapter further argues that it is through a critical legal-pluralistic lens that masculinities theory can inform the fruitful development and application of international legal norms in the context of peace negotiations. This shift of perspective goes beyond oversimplified binary thinking and the still dominant essentialisation of women and men as homogenous and exhaustive groups, and it has the potential of contributing to lasting, positive peace that is not characterised by the mere absence of armed violence but the manifestation of social justice.]
Published: Oct 9, 2018
Keywords: Peace Negotiations; Gender Justice; Mal Representation; Dominant Essentialisation; International Legal Discourse
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.