Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
This paper examined how youth in post conflict context navigate livelihood spaces and why some spaces rupture whereas others are coveted. The focus of the study was on why youth in post conflict communities in Nigeria who depended on agriculture for their livelihood lost interest in farming despite various intervention programmes. Drawing on six focused group discussions and a survey of the pattern of agricultural engagement of 420 youth, the paper argues that in post conflict context, a new order is created and youth’s choice of livelihood strategy is not usually based on moralistic assumptions but on craving for an improved position in the new order. Findings from the study attributed youth disinterest in agriculture to change in the societal incentive structure which shapes and validates livelihood options. By highlighting how youth in post conflict settings construe livelihood spaces and employ different agencies for gaining respectability in a new post conflict order, the paper provides insights into optimal attributes of post conflict interventions and incentives.
Journal of Applied Youth Studies – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 27, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.