Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[The chapter examines the activities of architect-conservators in Soviet Leningrad towards the preservation of the city’s churches. Arbitrating in the name of nauka (scholarship and science), they risked censure, on the one hand, from believers, insofar as they decreed certain churches not to be worth preserving, and on the other, censure for covert support for ‘obscurantism’ in impeding the plans of developers for destruction or reconstruction of churches considered to be emblems of the city’s heritage. Defending the claims of nauka, they opposed themselves both to demands for wholesale destruction and for indiscriminate retention. The chapter concludes that widespread claims that the project of secularisation in Russia and the former Soviet Union was a ‘failure’ should be offset against the striking success of Leningrad’s architect-conservators in pushing through their vision of how historic churches should be used—with respect above all for their aesthetic and architectural features—to preserve Russia’s heritage rather than their religious function.]
Published: May 15, 2016
Keywords: Historic Building; Soviet Period; Religious Believer; National Heritage; Soviet Power
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.