Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences www.elsevier.com/locate/shpsc Explanation: a mechanist alternative
M. Clark, David Liggins (2012)
Recent work on groundingAnalysis, 72
C. Gillett (2016)
Reduction and Emergence in Science and Philosophy
C. Craver, L. Darden (2013)
In Search of Mechanisms: Discoveries across the Life Sciences
S. Glennan (2002)
Rethinking Mechanistic ExplanationPhilosophy of Science, 69
Kit Fine (2012)
Metaphysical Grounding: Guide to ground
C. Gillett (2010)
Moving beyond the subset model of realization: The problem of qualitative distinctness in the metaphysics of scienceSynthese, 177
M. Kaiser, Beate Krickel (2016)
The Metaphysics of Constitutive Mechanistic PhenomenaThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 68
J. Schaffer (2016)
Grounding in the image of causationPhilosophical Studies, 173
P. Machamer, L. Darden, C. Craver (2000)
Thinking about MechanismsPhilosophy of Science, 67
S. Glennan (1996)
Mechanisms and the nature of causationErkenntnis, 44
(2007)
Explaining the Brain
P. Audi (2012)
Grounding: Toward a Theory of the In-Virtue-Of RelationThe Journal of Philosophy, 109
R. Hooke (2003)
Micrographia: Or Some Physiological Descriptions of Minute Bodies Made by Magnifying Glasses With Observations and Inquiries Thereupon
Jessica Wilson (2014)
No Work for a Theory of GroundingInquiry, 57
C. Gillett (2003)
The Metaphysics of Realization, Multiple Realizability, and the Special SciencesThe Journal of Philosophy, 100
Paul Thagard (2003)
Pathways to Biomedical DiscoveryPhilosophy of Science, 70
C. Gillett (2002)
The dimensions of realization: a critique of the Standard viewAnalysis, 62
[The primary concern of this chapter is to bring Dimensioned realization to the attention of both New Mechanists and “Grounders.” For both New Mechanists and Grounders, recognizing compositional explanations involving Dimensioned realization is an important step in the development of more descriptively adequate accounts of non-causal, compositional explanations. More specifically, Dimensioned realization shows how New Mechanists might embrace compositional explanatory relations among properties. Moreover, Dimensioned realization suggests that, at least at times, one needs to move beyond bare grounding claims—claims such as “X Grounds Y”—in order to develop a (good) explanation. In principle, the recognition of Dimensioned realization and its implications might be viewed as friendly additions to work on New Mechanism and Ground.]
Published: Nov 9, 2016
Keywords: Dipole Moment; Mechanistic Explanation; Dimension Realization; Hydrogen Fluoride; Causal Interaction
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.