Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[In this chapter, I consider some objections to the account of natural kinds that I have developed and illustrated in the previous chapters. The objections allege that the account of natural kinds is too liberal. It counts too many kinds as natural kinds, they say, making the modifier ‘natural’ a mere flourish and robbing it of any scientific or philosophical significance. To put the charge differently: If every kind turns out to be a ‘natural kind’, then we might just as well say that there are no natural kinds.]
Published: Oct 27, 2015
Keywords: Natural Kind; Alarm Call; Bake Good; Bolt Hole; Demarcation Criterion
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.