Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[Bleiklie (2004) has pointed to the fact that whereas a small higher education system lends itself to informal mechanisms of management and control, the strong growth and emergence of an institutionally and socially far more heterogeneous and functionally more complex system has been followed by the introduction of more formal mechanisms of management control and the rise of stronger administrative apparatuses. In a Norwegian context, the development towards an increasingly differentiated and diversified college sector eventually called for measures to counteract further fragmentation of the organisational field and to reverse the centrifugal processes. We can distinguish between four such measures – authority unification, institutional dedifferentiation, programme coordination, and field homogenisation. These processes can be subsumed under the common notion of field contraction in order to illuminate some of the horizontal integration processes in the college sector.]
Published: Jan 1, 2009
Keywords: Teacher Training; Preschool Teacher; County Council; Organisational Field; College Sector
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.