Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Bowdler, A. Malik (2017)
Openness and inflation volatility: Panel data evidenceThe North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 41
P. Dorosh (2001)
Trade Liberalization and National Food Security: Rice Trade between Bangladesh and IndiaWorld Development, 29
Usman Abdullateef, A. Ijaiya (2010)
Agricultural trade liberalization and food security in Nigeria
Brent Moulton, W. Randolph (1989)
Alternative Tests of the Error Components ModelEconometrica, 57
Ismaelline Nguema, Giscard Ella (2014)
Trade Liberalization and Food Security: For a New Green Revolution in Africa, 2
J. Hausman (1978)
Specification tests in econometricsApplied Econometrics, 38
D. Brooks, Benno Ferrarini, Eugenia Go (2013)
Bilateral Trade and Food SecurityPSN: Food Assistance (Topic)
Jane Korinek, Mark Melatos (2009)
Effets de certains accords commerciaux régionaux sur les échanges agricoles
T. Nijman, Marno Verbeek (1992)
Non-response in panel data: The impact on estimates of a life cycle consumption function.Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications
T. Breusch, A. Pagan (1980)
The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in EconometricsThe Review of Economic Studies, 47
P. Dorosh, Simon Dradri, S. Haggblade (2009)
Regional trade, government policy and food security: Recent evidence from ZambiaFood Policy, 34
D. Romer (1991)
Openness and Inflation: Theory and EvidenceNBER Working Paper Series
C. Calderón (2004)
Trade Openness And Real Exchange Rate Volatility: Panel Data Evidence
B. Pyakuryal, D. Roy, Y. Thapa (2010)
Trade liberalization and food security in NepalFood Policy, 35
William Escobar-Caicedo (2020)
Determinantes del uso y cantidad de uso de derivados financieros en las empresas no financieras listadas en la Bolsa de Valores de Colombia
[The paper conducted comparative analysis of the effect of trade liberalization on food security in CEMAC and WAEMU Countries with data spanning the period 1987–2014. Overall the findings lead to the conclusion of a negative effect in general. The beneficial effect of trade on the food situation is most visible in terms of availability. Also, it leads to lower prices. However, adverse terms of trade appeared to wipe off the positive effects and lead to food insecurity. This outcome is robust for both the CEMAC and WAEMU samples. With regard to policy, these countries should implement trade policies to facilitate of openness, while supporting and diversifying domestic food production.]
Published: Apr 6, 2019
Keywords: Trade openness; Food security; Africa; CEMAC; WAEMU; F14; O55; Q17; Q18
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.