Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Camposampiero (2008)
Homo inter bestias educatus. Langage et raison à partir du “Discursus praeliminaris”, 12
M Favaretti Camposampiero (2008)
29Lumières, 12
M. Camposampiero (2016)
Christian Wolff’s Philosophy of Medicine: An Early Functional Analysis of Health and Disease, 16
G. Leibniz, C. Wolff, C. Gerhardt (1971)
Briefwechsel zwischen Leibniz und Christian Wolff : Aus den Handschriften der koeniglichen Bibliothek zu Hannover
M. Camposampiero (2017)
Christian Wolff on Error and Ignorance
M. Camposampiero (2009)
Conoscenza simbolica. Pensiero e linguaggio in Christian Wolff e nella prima età moderna
H. Price (1988)
Change in View: Principles of ReasoningPhilosophical Books, 29
C. Wolff, H. Arndt (1965)
Vernünftige Gedanken von den Kräften des menschlichen Verstandes und ihrem richtigen Gebrauche in Erkenntnis der Wahrheit
Manuel Rodríguez (2012)
Logica naturalis, Healthy Understanding and the Reflecting Power of Judgment in Kant’s Philosophy, 103
M. Hoenen (2010)
From Natural Thinking to Scientific Reasoning: Concepts of "logica naturalis" and "logica artificialis" in Late-Medieval and Early-Modern Thought, 52
H-J Engfer (1992)
193
Jean-François Goubet (2004)
In welchem Sinne ist die Wolffsche Psychologie als Fundament zu verstehen? Zum vermeintlichen Zirkel zwischen Psychologie und Logik
[This chapter addresses the issue of Wolff’s alleged psychologism by offering a historical and systematic reconstruction of his doctrine of natural logic, which captures his mature views on the relation between logic and psychology. The long gestation of this doctrine began in 1705 with Wolff’s re-evaluation of syllogism. The subsequent discovery that syllogism also informs all of our inferential processes gradually led him to the idea that there is a logic embedded in the human mind which determines the laws of thought. Wolff had metaphysical reasons to ascribe a syllogistic structure to human reasoning. Endorsing mechanism, he deemed it possible to describe the mind as a machine governed by a set of fixed laws, and took the rules of syllogistics to be the only plausible candidate for the role of genuine laws of thought. This suggests that a fundamental assumption of modern psychology – the assumption that there are psychological laws – owes something to both early modern mechanism and the doctrine of natural logic.]
Published: Jul 17, 2021
Keywords: Christian Wolff; Natural logic; Psychology; Laws of thought; Mechanism
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.