Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Founding Fathers, Education, and “The Great Contest”“Raked from the Rubbish”: Stylometric Authorship Attribution and the 1795 American Philosophical Society Education Contest

The Founding Fathers, Education, and “The Great Contest”: “Raked from the Rubbish”: Stylometric... [This study attributes two pseudonymous entries to the American Philosophical Society’s 1795 education essay contest by employing conventional historical methods for the first, and a progression of stylometric measures and statistical techniques for the second. New knowledge of who participated in the educational conversation of the early republic is worthwhile in its own right, but it is also offered with a view toward understanding how stylometric analysis and corpus linguistics can contribute to historical argumentation and debate. It reports its methods and conclusions with a transparency characteristic of only the most recent stylometric studies, with the threefold hope that (1) standardization and even replicability will characterize future efforts; (2) nonspecialists will be emboldened to undertake similar work; and (3) recommendations for best practices will prove useful.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

The Founding Fathers, Education, and “The Great Contest”“Raked from the Rubbish”: Stylometric Authorship Attribution and the 1795 American Philosophical Society Education Contest

Part of the Historical Studies in Education Book Series
Editors: Justice, Benjamin

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/the-founding-fathers-education-and-the-great-contest-raked-from-the-0q0gGzyyMB

References (18)

Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan US
Copyright
© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2013
ISBN
978-1-349-44453-3
Pages
45 –65
DOI
10.1057/9781137271020_3
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[This study attributes two pseudonymous entries to the American Philosophical Society’s 1795 education essay contest by employing conventional historical methods for the first, and a progression of stylometric measures and statistical techniques for the second. New knowledge of who participated in the educational conversation of the early republic is worthwhile in its own right, but it is also offered with a view toward understanding how stylometric analysis and corpus linguistics can contribute to historical argumentation and debate. It reports its methods and conclusions with a transparency characteristic of only the most recent stylometric studies, with the threefold hope that (1) standardization and even replicability will characterize future efforts; (2) nonspecialists will be emboldened to undertake similar work; and (3) recommendations for best practices will prove useful.]

Published: Nov 14, 2015

Keywords: Type Count; American Philosophical Society; Anonymous Author; Token Count; Authorial Signature

There are no references for this article.