Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[Prevention is a matter of limits, of gauging the difference between the acceptable (or, rather, the not unacceptable) and the unacceptable. Understanding the discrimination to be made here necessitates delving into a more or less distant past and this explains our approach in the preceding chapters. This analysis would be incomplete if it failed to question more precisely the dialectic between the military doctrines of the law and the responses made from outside the state. The horizon of this exercise is a depiction of a “context of justice,” a climate that anticipates and foreshadows the decisions of the present. It is part of the trajectory that leads toward the explanation of the justifications of the post-September 11 conflicts and of those doubtless looming on the horizon.]
Published: Nov 9, 2015
Keywords: Geneva Convention; Hague Convention; Unnecessary Suffering; Cluster Bomb; Military Necessity
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.