Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Wilkins (1988)
The free‐standing company, 1870‐1914: an important type of British foreign direct investmentThe Economic History Review, 41
S. Masten (2009)
Public Utility Ownership in 19th-Century America: The 'Aberrant' Case of WaterIO: Regulation
(2005)
Water, Water, Everywhere: Municipal Finance and Water Supply in American Cities
J. Tarr, J. McCurley, F. McMichael, T. Yosie (1984)
Water and Wastes: A Retrospective Assessment of Wastewater Technology in the United States, 1800–1932Technology and Culture, 25
Werner Troesken (1999)
Typhoid Rates and the Public Acquisition of Private Waterwork, 1880–1920The Journal of Economic History, 59
M. Melosi (1994)
Sanitary Services and Decision Making in Houston, 1876-1945Journal of Urban History, 20
J. Tarr (1996)
The Search for the Ultimate Sink: Urban Pollution in Historical Perspective
C. Hamlin (1992)
Edwin Chadwick and the Engineers, 1842—1854: Systems and Antisystems in the Pipe-and-Brick Sewers WarTechnology and Culture, 33
Teresa Lopes, Mark Casson, Geoffrey Jones (2018)
Organizational innovation in the multinational enterprise: Internalization theory and business historyJournal of International Business Studies, 50
Álvaro Silva, M. Sousa (2009)
In search of the urban variable : Understanding the roots of urban planning in Portugal, 6
M. Falkus (1977)
The Development of Municipal Trading in the Nineteenth CenturyBusiness History, 19
J. Stine, J. Tarr (1998)
At the Intersection of Histories: Technology and the EnvironmentTechnology and Culture, 39
R. Coase (1937)
The Nature of the FirmEconomica, 4
D. Spar, K. Bebenek (2009)
To the Tap: Public versus Private Water Provision at the Turn of the Twentieth CenturyBusiness History Review, 83
R. Ekelund, R. Hébert (1975)
A history of economic theory and method
H. Demsetz (1968)
Why Regulate UtilitiesThe Journal of Law and Economics, 11
J. Tarr (1979)
The Separate vs. Combined Sewer ProblemJournal of Urban History, 5
J. Kellett (1978)
Municipal Socialism, Enterprise and Trading in the Victorian CityUrban History, 5
A. Chandler, D. Mccallum, J. Thomson, A. Fink, C. Perkins (1979)
The Railroads, pioneers in modern management
R. Millward (2005)
Private and public enterprise in Europe
R. Millward, R. Ward (1993)
From Private to Public Ownership of Gas Undertakings in England and Wales, 1851–1947: Chronology, Incidence and CausesBusiness History, 35
J. Hassan (1985)
The Growth and Impact of the British Water Industry in the Nineteenth CenturyThe Economic History Review, 38
G. Reid, W. Sharkey (1983)
The Theory of Natural Monopoly.The Economic Journal, 93
Tiago Saraiva, L. Schmidt, J. Pato (2014)
Lisbon Water regimes: Politics, Environment, Technology and Capital (1850-2010)Flux
Bob Millward (1991)
New perspectives on the late Victorian economy: Emergence of gas and water monopolies in nineteenth-century Britain: contested markets and public control
Álvaro Silva, Isabel Rodríguez (2019)
Global Value ChainsThe Routledge Companion to the Makers of Global Business
Á. Silva (1994)
Modos de Regulação da Cidade: a Mão Visível na Expansão Urbana.
Álvaro Silva (2014)
Organizational Innovation in Nineteenth-Century Railway Investment: Peripheral Countries in a Global EconomyBusiness History Review, 88
Werner Troesken (1997)
The Sources of Public Ownership: Historical Evidence from the Gas IndustryJournal of Law Economics & Organization, 13
J. Lemon, M. Melosi (1999)
The Sanitary City: Urban Infrastructure in America from Colonial Times to the PresentEnvironmental History, 105
W. Ouchi, O. Williamson (1977)
Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.Administrative Science Quarterly, 22
[This chapter advances two main explanations for the waterworks’ municipalisation trend after the late nineteenth century. On the one hand, the importance of abundant water in sustaining the technological innovation behind the new sewerage system. On the other hand, the difficulties in designing a proper regulatory framework for private firms in the water industry motivated by the high transaction costs in designing and enforcing contracts. Paradoxically, this argument is based on the study of a European city where private ownership and operation subsisted until the late twentieth century. Asking why Lisbon failed the municipalisation trend flips the conventional question on the reasons for increasing public ownership in water supplies. In a similar way to the deployment of counterfactual arguments for dealing with research questions, asking why municipalisation did not occur is similarly relevant, and perhaps even more illuminating in explaining the municipalisation movement.]
Published: Mar 19, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.