Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Politics of Regional Integration in Latin AmericaScope and Level of Integration: Explaining a Mismatch

The Politics of Regional Integration in Latin America: Scope and Level of Integration: Explaining... [One of the most visible contradictions of Latin American experiences with integration is the very modest level of integration achieved through the years, as compared to the inflated agenda of topics discussed by the presidents during their summits, or the great variety of norms adopted by the numerous organs. Level of integration most commonly refers to the institutions’ decisional authority, their enforcement capacities, and their ability to represent the regional common interest beyond and over private national ones. The threshold of supranationality is often considered a milestone in the evolution oward deeper integration. Although there is room for discussion on the importance of supranationality, without a doubt the balance between scope and level of integration deserves closer examination. Whatever we may think of neo-functionalism, Philippe Schmitter was right to point out the importance of this balance, considering that “whether member states will expand or contract the type of issues to be resolved jointly (scope), or whether they will increase or decrease the authority for regional institutions to allocate values (level), are the two basic dimensions for the dependent variable.” He correctly added that they were “by no means always covariant.”1 In another seminal piece on Central America, he described a dynamic of spill-around that Latin America still seems to perfectly embody.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

The Politics of Regional Integration in Latin AmericaScope and Level of Integration: Explaining a Mismatch

Download PDF
22 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/the-politics-of-regional-integration-in-latin-america-scope-and-level-VnIYi97LAR

References (3)

Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan US
Copyright
© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2009
ISBN
978-1-349-37545-5
Pages
107 –129
DOI
10.1057/9780230100749_5
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[One of the most visible contradictions of Latin American experiences with integration is the very modest level of integration achieved through the years, as compared to the inflated agenda of topics discussed by the presidents during their summits, or the great variety of norms adopted by the numerous organs. Level of integration most commonly refers to the institutions’ decisional authority, their enforcement capacities, and their ability to represent the regional common interest beyond and over private national ones. The threshold of supranationality is often considered a milestone in the evolution oward deeper integration. Although there is room for discussion on the importance of supranationality, without a doubt the balance between scope and level of integration deserves closer examination. Whatever we may think of neo-functionalism, Philippe Schmitter was right to point out the importance of this balance, considering that “whether member states will expand or contract the type of issues to be resolved jointly (scope), or whether they will increase or decrease the authority for regional institutions to allocate values (level), are the two basic dimensions for the dependent variable.” He correctly added that they were “by no means always covariant.”1 In another seminal piece on Central America, he described a dynamic of spill-around that Latin America still seems to perfectly embody.]

Published: Oct 8, 2015

Keywords: Integration Process; Regional Integration; Free Trade Agreement; Variable Geometry; Issue Area

There are no references for this article.