Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Sandra Mitchell (2002)
Integrative PluralismBiology and Philosophy, 17
James Brown (1984)
Scientific rationality : the sociological turn
P. Galison (1999)
Refections on Image and Logic: A Material Culture of MicrophysicsPerspectives on Science, 7
R. Frodeman, J. Klein, C. Mitcham (2012)
The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity
D. Penny (2015)
Epigenetics, Darwin, and LamarckGenome Biology and Evolution, 7
Patricia Kitcher (1992)
Freud's Dream: A Complete Interdisciplinary Science of Mind
T. Kuhn, David Hawkins (1963)
The Structure of Scientific RevolutionsAmerican Journal of Physics, 31
A. Koch (2015)
Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World (Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Science) by Michael WeisbergJ. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., 18
H. Andersen, Susann Wagenknecht (2013)
Epistemic dependence in interdisciplinary groupsSynthese, 190
Stephen Kellert, H. Longino, C. Waters (2006)
Theoretical Pluralism and the Scientific Study of Behavior
T. Pinch (1981)
Theoreticians and the Production of Experimental Anomaly: The Case of Solar Neutrinos
J. Holbrook (2013)
What is interdisciplinary communication? Reflections on the very idea of disciplinary integrationSynthese, 190
K. Knorr-Cetina (1982)
The Manufacture of Knowledge: an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science
P. Suppes (1969)
Models of DataStudies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, 44
H. Collins, R. Evans (2002)
The Third Wave of Science StudiesSocial Studies of Science, 32
L. Laudan (1984)
The Pseudo-Science of Science?
F. Copleston (1946)
History of Philosophy
M. Hoffmann, J. Schmidt, N. Nersessian (2013)
Philosophy of and as interdisciplinaritySynthese, 190
K. Knorr-Cetina (1999)
Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge
B. Latour, S. Woolgar (1979)
Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts
N. Cartwright (1999)
The dappled world : a study of the boundaries of science
R. Goodwin (1982)
A Growth Cycle
P. Suppes (1960)
A comparison of the meaning and uses of models in mathematics and the empirical sciencesSynthese, 12
[In this chapter, opinions for and against the relevance of philosophy of science to the study of interdisciplinarity are discussed. To some the relevance of philosophy may seem so obvious that it is hardly worth discussing. Others are of different opinion, though. Some arguments of the latter group are presented as well as some philosophical examples which speak strongly in favour of the former position.]
Published: Jun 26, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.